Hillary Clinton Rally in Los Angeles, May 31, 2008

Another Rally for Hillary Clinton included hundreds of enthusiastic car horns honking in response. One person actually got out of his car to join, and another happily received a Hillary Clinton Sign and immediately held it up high through the sun roof of her car as she drove off.

Channeling Sam Kinison to Tell Barack Obama how Stupid he was for Taking his Name off of the Michigan Ballot.

If you don't know who Sam Kinnison is/was, just type his name into You Tube and check him out. Most memorable was his ability to "YELL IN CAPS" to make what was usually a humorous, and salient point Blare across the room in screamvision. Sam had the misfortune of being killed in a head on collision. Really a stunning end to a comedic career that was still on the rise.

If Sam were alive today he'd have a field day with all three presidential candidates. However, I think Sam would have held a special spot in his heart for Barack Obama. Barack Obama took his name off of the Michigan ballot and once Sam got a whiff of that, I think he would have had a field day with it.

I could just see Sam SCREAMING something like. ARE YOU STUUUPPPIDDDD, ARE YOU NEWWWWWWW!!!! WHAT WERE YOU THINKING!

"HEY, I'M BARACK OBAMA AND I'LL TAKE MY NAME OFF THE MICHIGAN BALLOT EVEN THOUGH MY MAIN COMPETITOR IS LEAVING HER NAME ON THE BALLOT, THAT'LL SHOW EM......!!!

AND YOU WANT TO BE PRE----SI-----DENTTTTTTTTT! I DON'T THINK SOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Sorry Barack, just because the American Media has chosen to not exist this year does not mean that what you did, or didn't do in Michigan, wasn't about the dumbest, most idiotic and arrogant move a presidential candidate could make. The only reason you pulled off such a stupid maneuver without it harming you was because of the media's love affair with you.

If that had been Hillary Clinton's name not on the Michigan ballot, and Barack Obama's name had stayed on the ballot, I think it's pretty obvious that 10 Sam Kinnison's would have come out of the woodwork to scream out clearly and loudly about Hillary's lack of judgement. NOBODY in the mainstream media has questioned Barack Obama's judgement in removing his own name from a ballot even when his wiser opponent had not.

The Media is Addicted to Hating Hillary Clinton, WE WILL NOT FORGET!

Agenda Driven Andrea Mitchell uses the power of the written word to defile her own role of a news reporter reporting news, to one attempting to shape and mold the news.


Hillary Clinton bound and gagged and on the railroad tracks. Would we ever see an action hero such as Sylvestor Stallone or a political hero such as John Edwards in a similar "pose".

"I would be a liar if I said that there hasn't been a certain amount of glee in the press corps about Hillary Clinton not doing that well. To use a very fancy word, there's some schadenfreude among the press." -- Time magazine's Richard Stengel



This one needs no explanation, does it? The comments appear to be frozen at three. Maybe ABC realized the stupidity of their Headline, probably after people started complaining. The Obamalots can't hold it together long enough to officially win, that is how demented they really are. The Democratic Party has been taken over progressive aggressive zealots.

Why I WON'T support Barack Obama and WILL Support a Republican if Hillary is not the Nominee.

Too many Obama supporters think like the person below... This Barack Obama supporter actually blames Hillary Clinton and calls her "Sleazy" after Clinton has just been racially roasted by Pastor Micheal Pflegler to a standing ovation from the congregation, can it get any more demonic than that?Pelosi, Dean, and Reid are accommodating a coup they are too afraid to stand up to.

Rally for Hillary - Studio City - May 31, 2008, Saturday - Support Florida & Michigan Votes Counting, Puerto Rico Celebration.

RALLY FOR HILLARY - STUDIO CITY, CALIFORNIA

When:
Saturday, May 31, 2008 at 1:30 PM - 3:30 PM

Where:
Studio City, California
12051 Ventura Blvd.
Studio City, CA 91604

General Area: Ventura and Laurel Canyon Blvd.

Description:
May 31, 2008 - Saturday at 1:30 p.m. Rally for HILLARY - Studio City (Corner of Laurel Canyon and Ventura Blvd at 12051 Ventura Blvd., 91604). We'll be meeting on the corner of Ventura Blvd and Laurel Canyon. WEAR YOUR T-SHIRTS AND HATS. BRING YOUR SIGNS, FAMILIES AND FRIENDS. We were on the local news in April (see YouTube "Studio City for Hillary") but, we need EVERYONE to show up to make the national news!!! Please RSVP at www.hillaryclinton.com at 'Find Events'. SEE YOU THERE!

Host:
Hillary Supporters

Guest Reverend Michael Pfleger's Hillary Clinton Racist Bashing a Smashing Standing Ovation Success.

After listening to Michael Pfleger ridicule Hillary Clinton to the delight of Barack Obama's church members, I am beginning to wonder if I have lived my life at a disadvantage by not belonging to a racist group. Mr. Pfleger's performance, to the riotous joy of members of the church Barack Obama calls his own, has demonstrated to me that most people find comfort belonging to a tribe, no matter how racist that tribe may be.

I belong to the tribe of creativity. I've always tried to be supportive of creative people trying to make their legitmate projects a reality. But that is creative work, and church is church... Mr. Pfleger has shown me that the best a tribe can do is tolerate those who are deemed different while ridiculing those same outsiders when they are not present.

In my opinion Mr. Pfleger's performance was far far worse than anything Pastor Wright has been accused of doing. I have lost quite a bit of the respect that I previously had for the democratic party. Tolerate whitey when in their presence if possible, then laugh out loud about "anything whitey" when in church, that is the message that Mr. Pfleger delivered loudly and clearly to a standing church ovation, and that is the message the democratic party is in bed with at the moment.

Barack Obama might be the best thing about the area he grew up in, but when I factor in the white bashing environment he experienced in church and his cheating in the caucus states, I have lost interest in belonging to Barack Obama's tribe.

Barack Obama refuses to admit he made a mistake by taking his name off the ballot in Michigan, refuses to admit not wanting to count the votes in Florida is a mistake, and is the same man who eliminated his competition when running for the senate through every and all legal technicalities he could find. Barack Obama also cheated in the Caucus States as well. When I roll it all up I see a man who needs a few more years of ethics seasoning before he is ready for the presidency.

Maybe Hillary Clinton will let him be Vice President in the meantime.

CNN Barack Obama Documentary Special Thursday, May 29th, Tonight, on Anderson Cooper 360!

Update to this topic... For a really terrific article on Barack Obama's past campaign shenanigans, check out Barack Obama's election history hoisted by his own petard.

You can also check out the documentary video We Will Not Be Silenced. Preview portions of the video at We Will Not Be Silenced Preview Video

---------------------------------

When Anderson Cooper didn't bother to mention the Barack Obama segment at the beginning of his own show, I figured the Barack Obama expose wasn't that big of a deal.

While Anderson Cooper didn't appear very impressed with his own television staffs work on the piece, it does set up the possibility for an update. Should the caucus state cheating ever be investigated, it would make for an interesting follow up showing Barack Obama crossing a line that he dared tip toe up to when his senate career was just starting.
Above are stills from a promo on CNN for the Barack Obama Anderson Cooper 360 documentary about Barack's early political career which premieres tonight, Thursday, May 29, 2008 on CNN Anderson Cooper 360. CNN made the claim that the Barack Obama camp does not want this special to air.

We'll see.

Apparently the documentary will cover Barack's ability to take out his opponents such as Alice Palmer by using legal tactics, before they ever make it to the ballot. It looks to me like some things stay the same, now Barack has progressed to taking out opponents in caucus state voting, bending the law to the point of breaking, and perhaps beyond.

Upcoming Los Angeles Hillary Clinton Rallies, Are you Going?

Friday and Saturday, May 30 and 31. Will you be there supporting Hillary Clinton? Information to follow shortly.

Important Information about Caucus Cheating on CaucusCheating Blog.

The most stunning article on Caucus Cheating to date.

Caucus vs Primary vote tallies in the states of Idaho, Nebraska, and Washington.

Google Tries to Talk me out of using Hillary Clinton as a Key Word!

I'm just giving Google a fun hard time, but stating that Hillary Clinton is not a popular keyword, yeesh!

Gotta love the Google for Blogger, however.

Could you imagine what would happen if you were walking down the street in the early 90's and said "Gotta love the Google for Blogger," to a stranger.

What if you went back in time and said "Gotta Love the Google for Blogger" at the dinner table, or in the company of friends, to your political science professor, or at work. Ah yes, to go back in time and use present day nomenclature, what a trip that would be.

Hillary's Logical Message

The problem I have with the statement above is it reminds me of Al Gore in Florida in 2000. Al Gore logically asked that all the votes be recounted. The other side accused Gore of "changing the goalposts". In this years democratic nominating process, Hillary Clinton has already been accused of changing the goalposts by wanting all the votes, including those of Florida and Michigan, to count.

Just imagine the hornets nest that will be raised if Barack Obama has to look into the camera and say, "I did not cheat in the caucus state votes".

Huffington Post Slobbers over Clinton Supporter/Fundraiser Jill Iscol.

In what is probably either a back room deal to make nice with members of the Clinton fundraising side, or a quid pro quo deal with a back end return for Huffington Post at a later date, Huffington Post has had the audacity to print a complaint by Clinton supporter and fundraiser Jill Iscol on how the media has unfairly treated Hillary Clinton, without ever mentioning Huffington Post as the ringleader of the media bias and abuse!

This is such a laughably arrogant and malisciously condescending move by Huffington Post it just amazes me nobody goes after Arianna Huffington and her past. You know, the one with a FAILED attempt at being the WIFE of a GOVERNOR. The former wife of a man worth a gazillion dollars still could not help her own husband get elected governor in California is also the same person attacking a women who DID help her own husband SUCCEED as GOVERNOR AND PRESIDENT several times over.

After LOSING at becoming first lady in California, Arianna Huffington then LOST in her only attempt to become governor of California. Now Arianna Huffington has LOST what it means to be a responsible member of the media.

Arianna Huffington chooses to attack Hillary Clinton, a women who has SUCCEEDED every where that Arianna Huffington has failed, and then some. Hillary Clinton has TWICE SUCCEEDED at becoming first lady in Arkansas, TWICE SUCEEDED at becoming first lady of the United States. TWICE WON in the Senate. Hillary Clinton would most assuredly be winning the 2008 democratic race right now if Huffington Post were actually a legitimate news source reporting on the Barack Obama Caucus Cheating that has already occurred.

If it had been Hillary Clinton trying to hold back counting the vote in Florida and Michigan, Hillary would be out of the contest by now for trying to subvert the vote of the american people, courtesy of Huffington Post blasting her on an hourly basis. If it had been Hillary Clinton cheating in the caucus state campaigns instead of Barack Obama, it would be HIllary out of the race by now after being outed Huffington Post.

The question I have is, can we afford to validate an internet rag like the Huffington Post when they become the deciders of news rather than the messenger of news?

Have any delegates, friends of delegates, or superdelegates been swayed by the noxious fumes of a several times political loser bent on destroying a superior foe? If you have, change your mind now that you know the truth. Please don't use the Huffington Post, it's demonic, slanted headlines, nor follow the bitter banter of someone in need of counseling for her own failed political attempts.

We are not all here to validate Arianna Huffington, and I hope the super delegates and delegates realize that before it is too late.

Keith Olbermann MSNBC Boycott Petition, Please spread the link Far and Wide.

Please sign the Boycott Keith Olbermann petition, it's fast and easy!

In place of company name you can put the URL of this website if you want them to read about how annoying Keith has become. However if you want to put your business name instead that is fine to.

Sexism in 2008, yet Hillary Clinton Still Fights On.

Around a year ago I saw a television news story about a women who had saved somebody's life. The "woman saves a life" story was not the lead story of the television news show. The news anchors, one of whom was a women, sort of slipped the story of the women saving someone's life halfway through the newscast, in a sort of subdued, casual manner. So subdue was it I don't recall it other than it happened.

I began think of news stories involving men and heroism. Most of the stories involving heroic men would usually be on page one of the newspaper with a large headline and a picture. Or, the "heroic man" television news stories would be promo'd prior to the 11:00 news, and would then also be one of the leading news stories as well.

The belief that a man helping save someone else from tragedy is somehow more "newsworthy", braver, more heroic, than a woman saving somebody from a tragedy, is sexism. One could argue that if we accept the premise that women are genetically less muscular than men, and possibly limited by the wearing of heels or a flowing dress, then that would mean a heroic act by a women is either MORE heroic, or equally heroic, but certainly not less heroic, than the same act performed by a man.

I bring this up because just today (May 25, 2008) I was reading in the Los Angeles Daily News story about a helicopter crash in the Catalina Islands. A women literally ran towards the plummeting Helicopter before it had actually hit the ground. Would most people who saw a helicopter falling from the sky actually run up to it before it had even crashed?

I believe that most people would have either stayed exactly where they were, watching with their mouths agape, or they would have hid behind something to avoid possible wreckage projectiles. Instead our "heroine" ran towards the helicopter even before it had crashed into the ground. After the helicopter did crash our heroine helped pull a man with two broken legs out of the burning helicopter wreckage..

If it had been the women's husband who had run up to the helicopter and pulled the man out, the story would have run on page one, with a picture. The man would have become either a celebrity, or if not a celebrity, an appearance on Jay Leno or David Letterman might have been in their future. (that is a slight dig at these two late show hosts for ridiculing Hillary Clinton on an almost nightly basis).

Sexism is still alive and terrible in this day and age. Hillary Clinton has had to battle sexism during her democratic presidential campaign in the form of media bias and harrassment. The biggest manifestation of sexism has been the media attacks that Hillary Clinton has had to endure on an almost daily basis. Keith Olbermann's "we have forgiven you time and time again" speech was the apocalypse of sexism and set the women's movement back a good 10 or 20 years. Unless Olbermann is suspended until after this years elections are done, the bar has moved back for women in their fight against sexism.

Having taken every shot and bounced back, Hillary Clinton has yet to receive the real prize, the acknowledgement that she is the more popular democratic candidate. Hillary's primary foe has been the pseudo college educated internet mudslinging college educated male, who feels under appreciated and threatened by Hillary Clinton's popularity.

It's harder to be the more popular candidate when sexism is still alive and gaining on you by males who oppose you and call your supporters racists.

Barack Obama Fanatics.

Get Educated BEFORE you get Dedicated.

33 countries have Visited www.Hillary-wins.com

Thanks!

Politico.com calls Keith Olbermann the Dumbest Man Alive.

You have to connect a couple of dots to get there (sadly, that is something Keith won't be able to do by himself), but it appears that Keith Olbermann is the dumbest man alive. Politico.com has stated that when they first heard Hillary Clinton had made a serious gaffe, they were besides themselves with excitement at possibly having a campaign changing scoop.

After Politico.com saw the text of what Hillary Clinton actually said, they were quickly disappointed as there was no "off with their heads" type of comment to headline. Holding out hope that the video would make the story sizzle anew, Politico.com watched in disappointment as a deposition style of interview video did little to justify a ground breaking headline in the making.

But wait, the media picked up on the non story and went with it anyways! Huffington Post, CNN, MSNBC, dozens of blogs that purport to being intelligent all led the charge that Hillary had made the biggest all time bungle ever. Jack "Hack" Cafferty and Keith "blabber on and on" Olbermann treated the Hillary Clinton commets as if it was more important than the severe weather storms that have resulted in well over 50,000 deaths worldwide in just the past couple of weeks. Keith Olbermann's blabberings on non-issues are becoming legendary and perhaps the only reason he is still on the air, people just can't wait to see Olbermann top his last stupid outburst.

Politico.com Article Proves Keith Olbermann is the Dumbest Man Alive and that the Media Hates Hillary Clinton since they ran with this story even after reading and seeing the video.

Hopefully the present political media is purged in the not too distant future at both MSNBC and CNN (except for Lou Dobbs), but for now I am certain they will not admit just how stupid they look after leading with this non-story all day Friday. Instead the political media will just play along as if it was yesterday's news. Nor will the political media apologize, that's something that only Hillary Clinton is supposed to do (saracasm alert). I believe it won't be too long before many of the CNN and MSNBC political "pundits" will be yesterday's news as well.

From Sea to Shining Sea, Hillary Wins!

My instincts tell me that never has a democratic presidential candidate won states that touch each other from one coast to the other, and not been the democratic presidential candidate.

Factor in the theft of the caucus state votes by Barack Obama's side, factor in the not counting of Michigan and Florida and clearly Hillary Clinton IS the democratic nominee. Now the question becomes, do we allow the media and the internet rag websites to steal the democratic nomination from Hillary Clinton?

Jack Cafferty condemns Story of Eleven Year Old Boy who Sold his Bicycle so he could Donate the Proceeds to Hillary Clinton's Campaign.

Some may argue that Jack Cafferty was actually condemning Hillary Clinton for accepting a donation from an eleven year old youth. However, since Jack Cafferty regulary attacks Hillary Clinton, it is actually more accurate to say that Jack Cafferty condemns 11 year olds who want to make a difference in this world.

Watching Jack Cafferty reminds me of the Star Trek episode in which James T. Kirk, Spock, and McCoy visit a planet that has mimicked the roaring 20's. To hear Jack Cafferty speak and whine in his gravely voiced, one upmanship demeanor makes one wonder if maybe he didn't fall out of that Star Trek episode and accidentally land inside the CNN studios. Either that or the CNN stage hands accidentally found him waiting to be discovered between two forgotten dust laden set pieces.

Perhaps Jack is jealous that he wasn't as savvy at the age of 11 as the young man intelligent enough to want Hillary Clinton for President. By the way, this is a recycled topic from a week or two ago that appeared on Huffington Posture, er Post that Cafferty chose to dissect.

I have heard of underage kids selling family possessions to buy drugs, but how dare an eleven year old kid show he has a genuine interest in the world around him. If that interest is not for Barack Obama, it just can't be a valid, can it? (sarcasm alert, sarcasm alert).

Cafferty, find some background extras work from a prohibition era movie or television show, you would blend right in, no acting required. No offense to extras who already work on such movies or shows is intended or implied, it's just that Jack would be a natural, and more in touch with his surroundings than his takes on Hillary Clinton.

Please Keith Olbermann, Just Shut Up.

Hey Keith, remember the 90's? You know, that special time when the United States actually reduced it's own budget deficit, was actually liked around the world, and YOU saw your own career flourish, in part because of good economic times. Good economic times brought on in part by two Bill Clinton terms in office.

I am trying not to curse, out of respect to

nocussing.com,

but Keith Olbermann is so out of line in his most recent anti Hillary Clinton "commentary" that it will take a village to honor the no cussing pledge. Keith Olbermann, when you bellow your views to the "shocked they ever liked you" television audience, don't say "we", as if you speak for me, because you don't.

Your attempt to use the word "we" several times in your anti Hillary editorial just reminds us all of what an unloved nerd you probably were in your teens. Keith arrogantly and condescendingly explains how "we", have "tolerated", and "forgiven" Hillary Clinton for a list of wrongs so long that they could circle the globe at least once. Yet Keith never brings up how condescending and pre-meditated he and his elitist groups of "super friends in search of a purpose" at MSNBC have become in their ongoing snide commentaries of Hillary Clinton the women, the person, the wife, the politician, the mother, the human being.

If I hear Keith Olbermann quote the Huffington Post one more time as if that somehow makes Huffington post a legitimate source of news, I may barf.

Keith, give it a very, very long, long rest. Your previous diatribe against Geraldine Ferraro, which I easily debunked in a prior editorial,

Geraldine Ferraro's Comments Explained,

was your dumbest and most embarrassingly melodramatic nerd rant I had ever witnessed, until now. Your attempt to successfully overshadow that herculeanly lame Ferraro editorial with your kooky attack on Hillary Clinton proves you can go lower than low. Slink away my good man, take a vacation, get a massage, do something to remove the sharp metal object that seems to be jabbing you every time you pontificate. Keith Olbermann, every time you speak about the democratic presidential race, diarrhea oozing from your mouth is sure to follow.

Keith, over 17 million voters have voted for Hillary Clinton this year, or about 100 times a larger audience than your average viewing audience is after "we" subtract all the Clinton supporters who no longer can stand your sorry butt.

CNN Headlines Attempt to Change History of the Florida Vote.

I can't keep up with the barrage of Pro Obama "news" stories that falsify history while trying to make Obama look like the supportive candidate in Florida. It is just mind boggling that our news channels think they can get away with headlines such as "Obama's Fight for Florida" when it is Barack Obama who has refused to allow Florida's votes to count.

It's Barack Obama, all the time, fighting for Florida. CNN, are you kidding me????

I had forgotten how obnoxious, arrogant, and smug Mr. Cafferty can be. Yeesh.

Is it time to beg the United Nations to intervene in U.S. news reporting? Has anyone seen Keith Olbermann's latest insane tirade against Hillary Clinton? Keith Olbermann, you need help. Pretending to report the news when you already have a completely fixed and made up agenda is every bit as low as other news correspondents that you regularly rail against.

Pathetic.

Exploring Barack Obama's Religious Convictions with His Own Behavior in this Year's Democratic Race.

Coming Soon, An analysis of Barack Obama's religious convictions and beliefs and how they may not match with his own behavior in this years democratic election process.

Jay Leno Joke seems to Insinuate that Barack Obama has Cheated.

Here is the Jay Leno Joke that seems to imply that Barack Obama has cheated in the 2008 elections.

"Ya know there's an article in the Wall Street Journal this week about Olympic athletes who come in second. Eventually getting the gold medal like years after a doping scandal. Like the women who lost to Marion Jones, ya know the story. She was now awarded the gold medal after Jones steroid scandal, seven years after the fact she was declared the winner. Lets just hope Hillary Clinton doesn't read this story."

Shouldn't the punch line have used "Al Gore" instead of Hillary Clinton? But whether Jay Leno uses Al Gore or Hillary Clinton as the punch line, the joke still implies that the perceived second place finisher will be Hillary Clinton and that the winner, Barack Obama, is the equivalent to Marion Jones. Since we now know that Marion Jones has been disqualified for cheating, it appears that Jay Leno is insinuating Barack Obama cheated in this years elections and that Hillary should actually be declared the winner, seven years from now.

I have a suggestion to add to Jays joke, lets not wait seven years, lets not wait seven months, lets ask Barack Obama if he thinks he is living up to his own religious and ethical manifests by keeping excessive caucus delegate counts he did not honestly deserve.

Is it religiously and personally ethical for Barack Obama to stop Florida delegates votes from counting before the nomination has been secured? It may be good political gamesmanship, but certainly not on an ethical and religious basis, that's for sure.

If Barack Obama is serious about "change", than valuing strong religious concepts such as not stealing or cheating, and valuing ethical responsibility as much as political gamesmanship would seem to me to be a cornerstone tenet to his "Change" doctrine.

Is Barack Obama expecting his followers to follow his credo of change, and of doing more with less, even as he, Barack Obama does not back up his own beliefs?

Maybe Barack Obama's "Change" slogan, is "just words", full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

CaucusCheating Blog Heating up.

Don't forget to check out the Caucus Cheating blog (link on the right), also known as

CaucusRebellion.com

Andrea Mitchell Faux Pas

Just a couple of minutes ago (Thursday around 10:AM pacific, May 22, 2008) Andrea Mitchell was discussing the results of a new Quinnipiac poll that reveals Hillary is stronger in the three swing states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida. Andrea Mitchell then asks Chuck Todd, (the numbers guy for MSNBC), "Tell us why these numbers are wrong", and Chuck Todd replies, "Well, I don't know if the numbers are wrong".

lol, can we ask anymore of a leading, anti Hillary question, Andrea? Media bias against Hillary has been inbred into virtually all of the MSNBC Show Host Anchors. The starting premise always seems to be that Hillary is somehow wrong, now we'll show you why....

You Are Not Alone!

This Blog exploded yesterday for a variety of reasons. This little old blog received a one day rating in the top 150 yesterday out of thousands upon thousands of blogs that get rated daily. No advertising has been done for this site, however the existing Hillary Clinton internet network has taken notice of this blog.

There is a movement out there to see Hillary Clinton as the democratic nominee and it is growing and revitalizing by the day.

My blog/website mission is slightly different from those who want to see Hillary elected President, but if I succeed in my mission it could ironically result in Hillary Clinton as the nominee anyways. I want to see the caucus state votes and delegate distribution to each candidate re-evaluated so they reasonably represent the popularity of both democratic candidates.

Again, I am saying REASONABLY represents each candidate. If one candidate had a better grass roots effort in a caucus state, that should be rewarded, up to a certain point. However, when caucus state results start coming in that are just ridiculously one-sided, the democratic processes for electing a president have been thrown aside for an agenda of greed and avarice.

Many caucus state elections did not reflect a reasonable level of accuracy for both democratic candidates, and I won't support any democratic process that allows obvious cheating to affect the outcome. (the unobvious cheating is harder to find).

I also want to publicize how the Barack Obama camp will only seat Florida and Michigan when those two states can no longer affect the outcome of the presidential race. I find both of the issue of the Caucus elections along with Florida and Michigan to speak to the lack of character from Barack Obama. Barack Obama continues to use math to dictate his next course of action even when it truly disenfranchises ALL voters by making some votes count for too much (caucus state votes) and other votes count for nothing (Florida and Michigan).

Barack Obama's FAKE huge crowd in Oregon.

What is it about the media? Somebody tells them something, and they just report it. lol, I can do that myself, so can anyone. I thought the Idea was to verify and probe for hidden agendas and separate the hidden agenda, from the truth.

Here is the truth. Barack Obama had 72,000 people come hear him speak BECAUSE THERE WAS A 45 MINUTE ROCK CONCERT BEFORE HE SPOKE, and because it was a beautiful weekend day to be at the park! In other words, they weren't all Barack Obama supporters and those that were had two other great reasons to be there besides Obama.

I had surmised that there was some other event going on before Barack Obama spoke, or after he spoke. lol, I didn't have time to do any further research but suddenly on

hillaryclintonforum.net

there was a topic that outs the Oregon event as a fraud.

HRC Forum Topic On Obama Rock Concert

My Disgust grows at golden boy Obama. This type of media fakery may be brilliant, but it shows just how desperate the Obama people are behind the scenes that they have to resort to this type of fraud. So, Keith Olberman, Chris Matthews, MSNBC, and CNN, and ALL THE OTHER NEWS MEDIA THAT REPORTED THIS EVENT AS IF IT WAS ALL ABOUT OBAMA and how amazing he is, aren't you even just a little bit embarrassed that you perpetuated an outright lie?

The sad fact is, the arrogant (nocussing.com) you know what U.S. media, doesn't give a dang.

New Blog Devoted to Caucus Cheating Now Online!

I think it's time to focus on Caucus Cheating that I KNOW went on that has unfairly influenced this election. I just put up the

CaucusCheating Blog

and will expand it to ALL CAUCUS VOTES from all the caucus states over the next day or two. YOU will be the star as you tell us what you saw during the caucus state voting.

How Obama and Richardson Cheated in the Iowa Caucuses, by Robert Vinciguerra

More Media Bias Against Hillary Clinton Courtesy of Yahoo.

After Demolishing Barack Obama in Kentucky by 35 percentage points, Yahoo goes with the headline "Clinton not ready to concede", and then Yahoo starts their story with... "Despite being trounced in the Oregon primary, Hillary won't throw in the towel yet....

Kentucky and Oregon have very similar population totals, but somehow Hillary was trounced in Oregon by 18 points, but no such language is used to describe Hillary's 35 point winning margin in Kentucky. This type of internet "news" reporting has been going on for several months now.

The lack of quality reporting about the cheating that went on by the Barack Obama camp in the caucus states and the assault on Hillary Clinton by the media and the internet has been a disgrace to freedom loving people around the world.

Hillary Clinton Supporters Celebrate Kentucky Win and Protest at NBC, Burbank.

HIllary Supporters Gathered in Burbank to celebrate Hillary Clinton's 35 point victory in Kentucky AND to PROTEST MSNBC's absolutely one sided and completely slanted coverage of this years Democratic Presidential campaign.

Chris Matthews, Andrea Mitchell, Keith Olbermann, Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post, Daily Kos, Cafferty of CNN were just the tip of the Obama love in and Hillary hate out over the past several months. Quotes such as "Tear her head off" by Chris Matthews, Keith Olberman suggesting Hillary Clinton be put in a room with enforcers, and on and on it went with the negativity have put fear in my heart at how easily the democratic party was invaded by progressive/aggressives posing as democrats, both in the media and on the internet.

These are not your Obama Internet Trolls, that's for sure, and I'm glad they're on Hillary's side.

Florida and Michigan Don't Exist in Barack Obama's World. Can Pluto be far behind. (yes, I know).

Barack Obama cheated in the Caucus State elections yet nobody will investigate and bring the caucus cheating reality out into the light.



The above video was put on Youtube by glozell1

Barack Obama has Already Sunk his own Cause.

As I analyze the month by month goings on in this years democratic election, I find Barack Obama has never failed to choose mathematically elevatng his chances of becoming president, even if the mathematical tactics alienate tens of millions of voters. All along, at every bend where Barack Obama could manipulate a result in his favor, he and his handlers have taken the opportunity and run with it.

Knowing that he would lose in both Michigan and Florida, Barack agreed to "not let those states count". Somehow the media actually gives Barrack Obama kudos for nobly agreeing not to let two huge states votes count, states that he was going to lose in. Pundits actually think that Barack did some kind of amazing gesture by taking his name off the ballot in Michigan. If Hillary Clinton had done that, the pundits would be laughing at her and her lack of judgement. But Barack Obama does it and it is lauded as a pro party act. Why didn't Hillary take her name off of the ballot back in January? Why did Barack? Barack did because any state that he won't get a majority vote in is a state that shall be called "denial".

Never mind that Barack Obama ran cable televison ads a week or two leading up to the elections in Florida. This tactic by the Obama camp has become known as the "Hedge your bet" maneuver. The Obama camp is constantly hedging their bets. Anything that favors Hillary MUST BE DENIED or called racist, and anything that favors Barack Obama is due to hard work and planning, and never to his outspending Hiillary in every state they compete in, or to cheating of the kind that went on in the caucus states.

After Barack Obama decided to let the votes of Michigan and Florida only count when they can no longer have an affect on the outcome of the race, came the caucuses of February. In as many as four or five caucuses, Barack Obama received a 30% margin of victory in states that were virtually tied in the polls that preceded the votes. Once again, the math matters more to Barack Obama then the disenfranchisement of millions of democratic voters who simply want their vote fairly represented in the caucus states.

Then came Ohio and Texas, in which Barack Obama was able to lose the popular vote in Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island, but gleefully chortle that Hillary barely made a dent in the delegate race because of the caucus shenanigans of Texas.

Next was a solid Pennsylvania win for Hillary Clinton, with the Obama people claiming that since Barack drove down a 20-25 point lead to 10 points, it could hardly be called a victory. Never mind that Obama outspent Hillary 3-1 in Pennsylvania. Then the exact opposite situation happened in North Carolina.

North Carolina ended up being a virtual identical rehash of the Pennsylvania race, but in reverse. But once again the media and Barack uses math to somehow claim that his victory in North Carolina was a back breaker, even though Hillary won Indiana, which had been deemed the tiebreaker several weeks earlier but suddenly it was as if that had never been said by Barack.

Then came a shockingly huge win in West Virginia for Hillary Clinton, in which once again, Barack Obama tried to overshadow the results by playing the John Edwards card. Time and time again the media and Barack Obama have played the numbers card, this time equating John Edwards and his 18 delegates as more meaningful than Hillary's win in West Virginia.

The perpetual use of numbers in an attempt to obfuscate the reality that Barack does not have a true democratic majority will probably just alienate many middle aged and older democrats. Don't be surprised if many of the young, thuggish internet egg heads that helped steal the caucus state vote for Barack Obama while also rationalizing not counting Florida and Michigan actually alienate many, many long time democrats in this years fall election.

If there was still time, Hillary Clinton could probably run as an independent this fall, and gain the most votes of any of the three candidates.

I Need Your Help for my Next Article.

Back in 1991-92, somebody on the republican side smirked that George Bush and his post Iraq, "3 Day War 90% popularity rating", would be running against "The seven dwarves" (7 democrats were running for president against Bush). In case you have forgotten, Bill Clinton won that year, with a bit of a boost from a certain lady who put up a sign at one of the debates that said "It's the economy, stupid" for husband Bill to read. That moment may have been the turning point in the campaign for Husband Bill who would pull away from the field from that night on.

I believe an update to the George Bush and the seven dwarves comment is appropriate since Hillary Clinton has been running against her own set of Dwarves. However, I first want to apologize to dwarves, midgets, small people and "midga's"

Roger Eberts Dwarf Dilemma

as I absolutely don't know what word to use that is both respectful and allows me to write this article since it's ultimate references is Snow White and the Seven dwarves, the 1992 Presidential Race, and how both relate to this year's campaign.


Hillary Clinton has been running against a nasty group of dwarves. I seem to recall in the original Snow White and the Seven Dwarves that the Dwarves protected the Princess from the Evil Witch. In this years version, the Dwarves are devil spawn and as a result have toughened up Snow White until she became the Iron Princess.

So while I wait to be educated as to how best to write about "midga's", I would like to see who you think the 17 dwarves (7 is not enough) are in this years election. Rather than protect their Iron Princess, they kicked, punched, screamed and whined every which way she turned. There was sniper fire, Hillary just got the year wrong. The sniper fire was this year, courtesy of the 17 Dwarves. Help me come up with a list of the top 17 Dwarves that opened fire on their own Iron Princess this year so we can properly award them their crowns.

Hillary Clinton, Still in it to Win It.

Hillary Clinton, Still in it, to Win it.

Media REFUSES TO UPDATE NORTH CAROLINA MIS-Vote!

Apparently there were votes that were counted twice in North Carolina that may have incorrectly swelled the final margin of victory by anywhere from 1-4% from what it actually was. However, NOBODY in the media will update their election totals from that night nor offer a retraction to their erroneous vote totals that were used to try and create the lie that Hillary had failed hard in North Carolina.

Apparently North Carolina is finalizing their results on May 22,23. Meanwhile Barack Obama trys to force Hillary to quit so that he can stop campaigning and then downplay the caucus cheating his side engaged in as meaningless since he would have won anyway. If in fact Hillary lost by 11% instead of 14%, it will also mean that the walk up vote from the actual election day will be even closer than that margin because Barack had a 100,000 mail in lead. In other words, it is possible that Hillary only lost the walk up vote by a 6-8% margin.

Hillary Clinton not only was trailing in the polls by 22-25% just two weeks before the democratic primary in North Carolina, but Hillary had actually closed the deficit to as little as 11%. How can that be seen as a huge Barack Obama victory when the same media attempted to downplay the Pennsylvania victory by saying that Barack Obama came back from a 22-25% deficit, and had closed it down to 10%!

I implore any foreign media with an objective eye to start reporting the truth and quit taking feeds from the United States news establishment and instead start reporting what is really going on, a coup of the democratic party by progressive/aggressives posing as democrats.

Hillary Rocks in Century City!

Hillary Clinton vowed to fight on in Century City last night in front of an enthusiastic and eager crowd that paid 150 to 1,500 dollars each for the chance to be with their hero and future president, Hillary Clinton. It is clear from the capacity filled venue that those attending are "not your Obama's angry internet trolls" but nice people that are actually perplexed at how the media keeps portraying Obama as the winner and that Hillary MUST quit before the convention.

Never before in the history of democratic nomination races has a candidate been menaced into quitting like Hillary Clinton has by the media, and the media only.

The reasons the progressive/aggressives want Hillary to quit are obvious. Hillary Clinton will garner more popular votes and more delegates than Barack Obama from February 19th until the end of the democratic races in June. Howard Dean has already stated that that whomever has the stronger momentum over the final 10 campaigns could have an edge in convincing delegates and superdelegates to vote for them.

The Obamamites know Hillary will out gain Obama in the both the popular vote and the delegate count from Feb. 19 and on and are freaking out amidst the exterior calm they portend to portray. Their latest attempt to defuse their false lead was to announce John Edwards at a rally in an effort to pretend that Hillary Clinton did not win West Virginia by 41 percent.

Additionally, the Obama camp knows it is only a matter of time before their caucus cheating controversy is exposed. It can be mathematically proved that not only was Barack Obama's delegate lead built on cheating in the caucus states, but Barack's refusal to acknowledge Michigan and Florida will just show him for the mathematical manipulator that he has been all along.

If you are news media from another country, please use news material found on this blog to begin your own investigation into the caucus cheating that Barack Obama orchestrated. Hillary Clinton has a larger share of the democratic party than Barack Obama, but the media and US internet websites continue to lie about this in an effort to Boost the weaker candidate, Barack Obama.

Coming Soon, Hillary and the Seventeen Dwarves

Same Sex Marriage Approved By California Supreme Court.

Same Sex Marriage Approved By California Supreme Court.

Congratulations guys for coming out of the closet (not that there's anything wrong with that). However, it's too little too late.

In case anyone feels I am mocking the California Supreme Court's ruling today over same sex marriage, I am not.

I am actually mocking the attempt by the Barack Obama camp to try and overshadow Hillary Clinton's 41 point margin of victory in West Virginia, and the Nebraska primary vote, by introducing John Edwards the day after Hillary's huge victories.

The Edwards announcement was not a momentum changer, it was just touted as one by the media as an excuse to stop talking about West Virginia. The media never even got around to mentioning that in Nebraska Hillary Clinton only lost by two points in the Nebraska primary, a stark difference to the 35% point loss Hillary suffered at the hands of a cheating Barack Obama in the Nebraska caucus vote.

Let us not also forget the Washington State primary, which showed a 30 point margin of victory REDUCTION from their previous caucus vote. Barack Obama's caucus state wins are ALL TAINTED, and the mathematical proof is becoming more and more self evident with each passing day.

The More "They" Change, the More "They" Stay the Same.

The More "They" Change, the More "They" Stay the Same.

With every twist and turn of the democratic race, it becomes clear to me that, "The More "they" Change, the More "they" Stay the Same". Andrews, Lewis, McGovern, Richardson, Kerry, Reich, Kennedy, Oprah, etc, had no bearing on the West Virginia Results. lol, maybe they did. Maybe it would have been a 50% margin without their involvement.

Now enters Edwards. Cue the pomp and circumstance please.

Hillary has GAINED popularity over the final stretch of the democratic race, having actually received more popular votes after February 19th than Barack Obama and his merry band of misfits. The Huffington Post, NY Times, MSNBC and many many others have stomped on Hillary Clinton and still Hillary Clinton gains in popular vote over Barack Obama. It would be for Barack Obama to just give up and accept that Hillary is the more solid to the core democratic candidate, and the democratic presidential nominee.

Overheard on ABC nightline, Barack Obama's coalition is made up of eggheads and african americans. Truer words were never spoken. As word and statistical proof spreads that Barack Obama's camp cheated in the caucus state races and will only seat Michigan and Florida if their delegates don't matter, it's time to end this charade of charlatans cascading to Barack Obama's side as if they just won first place on Survivor. All the charaders are doing is making Barack's boat list to one side before it quickly sinks into the Ariannas Trenches.

The more they change, the more they stay the same.

The Second Nail in the Caucus Coffin against Obama, NEBRASKA's Primary results show a Virtual Tie.

The Second Nail in the Caucus Coffin, NEBRASKA's Primary results show a Virtual Tie.

First it was Washington State revealing a swing from 68%-31% in favor of Obama in the Caucus vote to 50% to 47% in the non-binding primary. Now Nebraska reveals a 68%-32% Barack Obama lead SHRINKING to a 49%-47% margin in their primary vote.

Isn't it pretty obvious that Barack Obama CHEATED in the caucus state votes? Isn't it pretty obvious that without Barack Obama taking his defeats like a man in both Florida and Michigan, and then cheating in the caucus state votes, he would NOT be ahead of Hillary Clinton right now?

Time to look yourself in the mirror and realize the lies that have been made on your behalf, Barack Obama, and do the right thing.

Proof of HUFFINGTON POST HARASSMENT against Hillary Clinton.

Proof of HUFFINGTON POST HARASSMENT against Hillary Clinton.

Just below is a graphic of the Prediction I made on www.HillaryClintonforum.net the day of the West Virginia Primary. I predicted that The Huffington Post would view the West Virginia democratic election results in racist terms no matter what the result.

Please let this sink in for a moment. One day BEFORE Huffington Post ran their headline (shown at the bottom of this editorial), I was able to predict what their headline would be! The Huffington Post is a sham. Predictable and hostile venom being spewed towards Hillary Clinton on an HOURLY basis, just because they can.

THE DAY AFTER I HAD MADE MY PREDICTION about what the Huffington Post Headline would be, you can see for yourself that I was 100% correct.

As I predicted a day before it happened, If Hillary wins by a big amount, The Huffington Post will state that the racists came out in droves to lead Hillary to victory, and if the victory falls short, the Huffington Post will run a headline that states Hillary Clinton's racist base is eroding. JUST ONE DAY AFTER HILLARY CLINTON WON BY 41 POINTS IN WEST VIRGINIA OVER BARACK OBAMA they ran the above headline. I wouldn't expect this type of "news reporting" in the most repressive regime on the planet, but in the United States, we simply call it free speech. Pathetic.

The Huffington Post is a biased electronic rag of a website that has a pre set agenda to get Barack Obama the nomination at any cost! They are not a legitimate news organization, yet MSNBC constantly quotes them. The fix is in, and it is AGAINST Hillary Clinton and has been going on for several months. Please pass this on to everybody you know, enough is enough.

In what is probably an additional twist to this story, the Huffington Post has LIED. The honest, hardworking Hillary Clinton supporters are NOT eroding, not after a 41% victory over Barack Obama in West Virginia. The Huffington Post not only calls Clinton's voting base racist, but then tries to claim the racist voting base is shrinking as well. These are the actions of an ill tempered juvenile, not what I would expect from an internet news website that MSNBC quotes on a sometimes hourly basis.

The Final Insult was the Huffington Post FAILING TO MENTION that in Nebraska, Barack Obama only won by TWO PERCENTAGE POINTS after winning a Nebraska caucus BY 36% earlier this year! Further proof that Barack Obama cheated in the caucus state votes and has stolen as many as 150 delegates even without counting Florida. In Washington State, the EXACT SAME THING HAPPENED! Obama won the caucus by a 68-31% margin, then won a non-binding primary by a 50-47 percent margin!

Any superdelegate or delegate that has been influenced by the Huffington Post has been had, please reconsider your vote. This example I am providing is just the tip of the iceberg.

The Goal Posts Keep Getting Moved by the Barack Obama Camp.

Those Goal Posts Keep Getting Moved Forward by the Barack Obama Camp.

If you listen to the progressive/aggressive media and internet news coverage, the claim is being made that Hillary keeps moving the goal posts back. The reality that is not discussed by the pundits is that it has been Barack Obama that continually moves the goal posts back and forth based on how the math affects his delegate count.

When Barack Obama was still gaining momentum and planning a secret coup in the caucus states, Obama moved the goal posts way far back by not allowing Florida's votes to count AND by taking his name off of the Michigan ballot. Neither of these moves had anything to do with following the will of the democratic party and everything to do with mathematical strategy. Why allow two states with large delegate totals to count when neither state would help Barack as much as they would would help Hillary Clinton in the delegate race?

After moving the goal posts back and not allowing Florida and Michigan to count, Barack Obama achieved a miraculous reception by winning a dozen caucus state votes in February. What made the wins "miraculous" was they outdistanced Barack Obama's primary wins by 10%, a 20% overall swing. In fact, Barack Obama's 11th largest winning percentage wins are ALL in caucus states, none in primary states. The odds of this being a statistical coincidence are in the millions. As soon as these miraculous caucus wins had been achieved, suddenly, Barack Obama moved the goalposts WAY FORWARD by saying there was no way that Hillary could catch her. Goal posts out, then goal posts in, courtesy of Barack Obama.

There's something about stealing an election in the caucus states and then proclaiming to the other candidate that they get out, that bugs me. First the goal posts were moved way way farther away when Barack saw an opportunity to nullify both Florida and Michigan, and then Barack moved the goalposts way in just a scant 4 weeks later after stealing close to 142 delegate votes from the caucus states and his top three primary wins.

This delegate advantage has then been used on a daily basis by the media, the internet progressive/aggressive internet news sites such as Huffington Post and others, and the Barack Obama camp to destroy Hillary Clinton in the popularity poll and used to intimidate other delegates into going for Barack Obama.

George Bush Says "I Gave Up Golf For The Troops"

George Bush Says "I Gave Up Golf For The Troops"

George Bush Says "I Gave Up Golf For The Troops". I am shocked by this statement by George Bush, I probably am in awe of it as well. However, George Bush's statement is "rife" with the further ironies it brings up. Dick "Duck" Cheney went around his ranch shooting shotgun pellets at defenseless birds. What does that say about Dick Cheney and his lack of respect for the troops since the troops are not facing a defenseless opposition.

The Hijacking of the Democratic Party.

The Hijacking of the Democratic Party.

The Hijacking of the Democratic Party by Progressive/Aggressives probably has it's roots in Howard Dean's tumultuous and instant crashing and burning during the 2004 democratic race, and the appointment of Nancy Pelosi as House Speaker and her failure to get american troops home as promised. Both Pelosi and Dean failed in their first attempt at acquiring power in too fast of a fashion so now they want to be known for something they successfully DID, not something they tried to do but failed at.

Dean was unceremoniously dumped in the 2004 democratic race after the "microphone gate" incident. "Microphone gate" consisted of somebody nefariously, or accidentally, muting out all the background sounds at a Dean afterprimary rally, except for the microphone Dean was yelling into. It instantly made Dean unfairly look like he was having a mental breakdown and pretty much ruined any momentum he had left. As I recall, Keith Olbermann gleefully played the clip of "microphone gate" over and over on his show, giggling and cackling anew with each and every replay.

Nancy Pelosi is trying to earn her own credo, a credo that originally was to be earned by getting our troops out of Iraq. That has not happened yet so something else, something big, needs to happen for her to justify her own position as speaker of the house.

The Clintons have their own people who they want to see do well, people who have been loyal to the Clintons over the past 20 years. An additional problem may be a perception that the Clintons will do it "their way" and exclude people like Dean, Pelosi, and Obama should Hillary become president.

It has taken a progressive/aggressive coup to try and topple the Clintons, and I believe this coup has to be called a failure for several reasons. The Progressive/Aggressive coup of the democratic party has been rushed along at too fast of a pace. In an effort to deny Hillary Clinton a possible popular vote victory, the progressive/aggressives have now resorted to calling whites who vote for Hillary Clinton "n West Virginia as "racists". Are these real democrats saying these things? Not real democrats, they are progressive/aggressives, perhaps launched by Arianna Huffington in her several year long quest to try and mold a third party.

Barack Obama has had to link the Bill Clinton presidency to the George Bush regime. Two more polar opposite presidencies could not be found. It is an insult to the extreme most definitely for the Clinton administration. lol, perhaps for the Bush administration as well.

Additionally, it has taken the sullying of the Clinton by Obamamite aggressives to give Barack Obama his "edge". Wait a minute, Barack Obama actually has no edge. If not for undervote caucus votes resulting in bloated delegate counts going to Barack Obama along with a couple of states giving Barack Obama way too many delegates compared to the overall popular vote in those specific states, there would be a swing of at least 142 delegates right now, perhaps even a few more. This without even counting Florida and Michigan. Yes, Hillary would actually be leading right now in the delegate race if Florida were counted.

Another tried and true Obama tactic, never allow your opponents traction, even if the will of the people demands it as is the case with Florida. Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi once again find themselves in the unenviable task of attempting a change faster than it reasonably should occur, and they have had to throw the Clintons and at least half of the democratic popular vote, to do it.

Why Hillary MUST NOT be forced to quit by the Democratic Party.

Why Hillary MUST NOT be forced to quit by the Democratic Party.

Even though I believe the caucus state results have been unfairly and unwisely tainted against Hillary Clinton for the past couple of months, I believe there is a very logical path to take until the convention. Let the convention be where the democratic nominee is decided. The advantage to this approach is if in fact the republicans can do a swift boat style of damage to Barack and they begin their attack early enough, Barack may agree that for the good of the party he should step down and let Hillary be the candidate.

Or is this just a one way street? Only Hillary should give up, and give up now, and under no circumstances should Barack give up? That does seem the way the Obmamamites want it, and I find it very suspicious.

It's All About Math for Obama, and it Always has been.

Its All about the Math for Obama and it Always has been

The real reason Obama took his name off of the Michigan ballot had less to do with following democratic rules and procedures and more to do with math. Back in January it made sense to not support any action that would accelerate the number of delegates that Hillary could get. Knowing that February would have a lot of caucus delegates up for grabs, it made no sense to allow Hillary Clinton to gain a sizeable delegate advantage before the February caucuses.

There was no nobility in Obama's decision to remove his name from the Michigan ballot. Even if the state had ended up in a tie, at the time that Obama decided to take his name off the ballot, a tie still favored Hillary because Hillary was leading early on. Further proof of this mathematical chicanery can be found in Barack Obama's most recent "peace offering". Once the Florida and Michigan delegates can no longer change the outcome of the race, then they can be seated.

The mathematical pathology of the Barack Obama campaign is chilling to say the least.