Where is my HILLARY CLINTON COMMEMORATIVE COIN, just like the one MSNBC keeps hawking for Barack Obama.

Why is there no commercial for a Hillary Coin? I would buy it. Perhaps the coin could say, 18 million voices silenced by Caucus Cheating, Ageism, and Sexism. Commemoratively speaking, if this type of a coin is not made and sold, then all there will be is a Barack Obama coin out there, and revisionist history takes a step up on what really happened.

Why is Sarah Palin's Wardrobe STILL a BIGGER ISSUE than Barack Obama accepting over 200 million dollars in Undocumented Campaign Contributions?

I just don't understand the Sarah Palin Wardrobe Controversy. Well, maybe I do, and the reason is reminding me why the PUMA movement cannot end even if Hillary Clinton ends up in the Barack Obama cabinet. Under no circumstance can I ever believe that what was spent on Sarah Palin's Wardrobe matters anywhere near as much as the amount of money Barack Obama's camp laundered during this entire campaign process.

Over time, the mainstream media will keep banging the drum over Sarah Palin's wardrobe, while simultaneously virtually no attention will be spent on Barack Obama's camp collecting and spending over 200 million dollar's in undocumented funds. Just today, Rachel Maddow had the gall to giddily proclaim that John McCain's McCain Feingold act was being stomped upon by the Republican party.

Well, what do you expect Maddow. Barack Obama's camp spat on the very concept of campaign finance fairness and you choose to ridicule the good guys. Guess what Maddow, your people aren't always above reproach.

Was MSNBC's Africa Launch, Jan 20, 2008 another reason for MSNBC to back Barack Obama?

An additional motivating factor for MSNBC to back Barack Obama over HIllary Clinton, the MSNBC launch in Africa of Free Satellite TV back in January of this this year. Here is a link to the story, the timing of the MSNBC launch was very fascinating. MSNBC Free TV to Africa Launched Jan 20, 2008.

Rationalizing MSNBC's anti female politician stance...

Is MSNBC's year long assault against female presidential and vice presidential candidates some sort of a rite of passage, a hazing of sorts? Is it possible that MSNBC has raised the bar for female presidential candidates and vice presidential candidates since there has only been one prior female vice presidential candidate, who ironically enough was hazed earlier this year as well. (Geraldine Ferraro).

One could argue that Barack Obama, as an african american presidential candidate, should have been "hazed" just as much if this is the rationalization that MSNBC is using against female politicians. If this article has done anything, it's reminded me that ALL THREE FEMALE VICE PRESIDENT and PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES in this country's entire history were all hazed this year, by MSNBC.

Wow.

Keith Olbermann perfects the Opratorial, and "Spews" will never be the same.

Keith Olbermann of MSNBC's The Three Tenners (also featuring sidekicks Matthews and Maddow) has officially perfected the Opratorial. The Opratorial is the fusing of a viewpoint on a issue, with loud, bellicose, red faced, salvia spewing, calm discourse.

What can make an Olbermann Opratorial so shrillbinding is Olberman's ability, (or inability) to sporn an impacted range of "you've got to be kidding me" wrapped within a verbal onslaught of, "you've got to be kidding me", served on a platter of, "you've got to be kidding me".

Just when you thought Olbermann's whining, whimpering, whacked a mole verbosity has reached a crescendo and could not possibly be topped, Keitho the Klown calmly takes a quick deep breath, and continues; a little redder in the face perhaps, an oxygen mask just out of view, ready to drop down and provide aid upon the completion of his opratory. (I've often wondered why MSNBC doesn't provide it's poor poor viewers with their own oxygen masks as well).

No Olbermann Opratorial would be complete without a reference to an arch rival, and Olbermann keeps his arch rival, Billo the Clown, within spewing distance, a key to any successful Opratorial that can't stand on its own merit. It has been rumored that Keith Olbermann warms up for his Opratorials by stepping on lawn rakes that pop up and hit him unmercilessly in the face.

Olbermann's ability to pass the rake in the face sensation on to his viewers is becoming legendary.

It was the White People in Barack Obama's backround that were the Worst of All, Did the Media focus only on the Non Whites on Purpose?

I've never been comfortable with all the bashing of Barack Obama's non-white alliances. I guess it took me this long to figure out why. There are many white alliances in Barack Obama's background that have questionable character. George Soros would have to be number one on the list. Arianna Huffington would be number two. Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews tied for third, David Axelrod number four, perhaps Bill Ayers would be fifth, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid tied for sixth, the rest of the MSNBC gang at 7th.

It probably looked racist to Barack Obama supporters for the opposition to be more pre-occupied with the non-whites in Barack Obama's background. Perhaps white people should have just focused on the whites in Barack's background that were behaving in what can easily be seen as questionable behavior.

The sad part is Barack Obama has conocoted a rainbow coalition of people of all colors that have checkered pasts. I think the reason many of the opposition complaints didn't stick was because white detractors of Barack Obama pointed to the non-white people in Barack's past, while letting Barack Obama's shady supporters who were white, off the hook.

Besides the white people mentioned above who I think have behaved in an ethically challenged manner, I should also add all the political losers who were white, that got on the Barack Obama bandwagon to crush the Clintons. These white political losers include Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, John Kerry, Howard Dean, John Edwards and Bill Richardson, ALL of whom have RUN FOR PRESIDENT or the Democratic Presidential nomination, and LOST!

It is an obvious slap in the face to the Clintons and lifelong democratic voters for all of these democratic presidential losers to just throw the Clintons to the curb and support a one term inexperienced senator when Bill Clinton has been the only two term democratic president in the last 50 years.

Think about it, Democratic presidential losers from the past 20 years, all gang up on the ONE AND ONLY democratic presidential winner's family. It's kind of creepy, and speaks to a coup of the democratic party, funded by George Soros.

In a past article I have written fondly of Pastor Wright, I think he is much smarter than Barack Obama. Ironically, above and beyond the issue of the people in Barack Obama's background, there was the issue of very unethical occurrences in this years 15 caucus contests, and the Barack Obama camp accepting over 200 million dollars in undocumented donations, this after rejecting matching funds that prior presidential candidates had all agreed to abide by.

So the question I have is, why didn't whites opposed to Barack Obama's supporters go after Barack Obama's white supporters? lol, there were PLENTY of white backers of Barack Obama that acted highly unethically in this election cycle. I can only begin to guess at the back room deals made and money possibly offered to get several prominent white people to back Barack Obama at the expense of the much better known and respected Clinton family.

I wish I had connected these dots earlier. In a way I did, as I have always tried to focus on caucus cheating issues, the concept of fair reflection denied earlier this year, Obvious media bias led by MSNBC, and sexism. I feel I never was able to reach those that didn't like Barack Obama for his non-white affiliations to find a better reason even when those better reasons existed.

If you are white, and you don't like Barack Obama's rainbow coalition of provocative supporters with questionable backgrounds, you made a mistake by going after the non-white Barack Obama supporters. If you were white, you should have focused on the provocative people backing Barack Obama, who were also white, there were plenty to go around.

I am a Hillary Clinton Supporter, and I APPROVED this Message.

MSNBC is Manipulating Numbers to try and Deflate John McCain Voters, here is the Statistical Proof.

From what I have read, Barack Obama is absolutely positively going to win California, New York, and Illinois. These three states comprise 22.5 % of all voters. Assuming a current lead for Barack Obama of 8 percentage points, the bigger the current polling margin of victory for Barack Obama in California, New York, and Illinois, the better for John McCain in the remaining 47 states!

Yes, up is down, and down is up.

Lets say that Barack Obama has an overall 8 percentage point lead in national polling of all the states. Lets also say that Barack Obama is leading in California, New York and Illinois by 20%. That means that in the remaining 47 states Barack Obama is only leading by 2.5% of the vote.

But what If the lead in California, New York, and Illinois is even bigger but Barack Obama's overall lead is still 8 percentage points? What if the lead in these three states is actually 33%, then in the remaining 47 states, the two candidates are basically tied in the popular vote!

While it is possible that Barack Obama could win in a landslide, it is also possible that John McCain could win several key states by a very small amount each, and in the process actually win the nomination even while losing the popular vote by several million votes.

What MSNBC is desperately trying to do is demoralize the John McCain base so they don't even bother showing up to vote.

The race is close enough for John McCain to still win, it's just the liberal media trying to get you to give up and not vote that might make Barack Obama a landslide winner instead of a very, very close, loser who wins the popular vote by a few million while losing the electoral college vote to John McCain.

How the MSNBC led media continues to manipulate math to make it seem like Barack Obama is too far ahead of John McCain.

MSNBC keeps citing national polls that show Barack Obama up by 12 or 13 percentage points. There is a definite misleading nature to this type of polling. Barack Obama may be hugely ahead in a few big states, like Illinois, New York and California, but that is not necessary the best of news for Barack Obama.

If Barack Obama has a huge lead in Illinois, New York and California, that may just be inflating the national polling numbers while meaning nothing in all of the closer races in the remaining states. Sure I'd rather be the candidate that that leads in New York, California and Illinois, and is neck and neck in the total vote of the other 47 races, but this is an electoral race, and a bigger lead in California, Illnois, and New York does not net Barack Obama any additional electoral college votes versus barely winning in those same three states.

It would appear that the way for John McCain to win is to barely win in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. Barack Obama could poll 10 points higher among the six large states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, California, New York and Illinois, but still end up splitting those six states.

If you want to get a truer sense of the overall race, the top five vote getting states of each candidate should be thrown out entirely, then poll the remaining 40 states to get a better sense of each candidates overall popularity. However, even then, if John McCain keeps eeking out 50-49% victories while Barack Obama has a couple of 66-33% victories, John McCain will actually do MUCH MUCH better in an electoral college race than in the national polls that simply poll for overall popularity.

However, the problem is the media itself is trying to use huge leads for Barack Obama in three large states to imply that the presidential race is already over. I actually wouldn't feel sorry about now if the MSNBC news headquarters blew a few fuses so we wouldn't have to hear their pro Barack Obama rant spewed fortg as fact, and in the process actually continue to unfairly manipulate the race.

Sarah Palin's Wardrobe IS NOT an issue, just retribution after Michelle Obama's 400 dollar lunch snack was publicized.

The Sarah Palin wardrobe "controversy" is easily debunkable. What did Hillary Clinton spend on her wardrobe. If the answer is, "a lot", then Sarah Palin is entitled to the same. If the answer to what Hillary Clinton's wardrobe cost is "modest and reasonable", then the response is, "well, it didn't help Hillary Clinton win, did it?

Additionally, the MSNBC led media has been ridiculing Sarah Palin on several fronts, the one area they could not ridicule Sarah Palin on was her clothing, until now. If Sarah Palin had worn anything too frumpy or too blue collar, the media would have just weaved Palin's clothing choices into their ongoing evisceration of Sarah Plain.

Well guess what, the MSNBC led media was going to eventually ridicule Sarah Palin's clothing no matter what she wore. To my eyes, MSNBC is incorporating a "damned no matter what they do" attack against McCain and Palin. The other thing to realize is this is a retaliation to Michelle Obama and her 400 dollar lunch of lobster and shrimp.

Is Chris Matthews and MSNBC the Bi-Polar channel? You decide if MSNBC's Pre-Debate stance and their after Debate stance merits Bi-Polar Status.

The MSNBC channel has developed a really sleazy strategy in their effort to take John McCain down. First MSNBC identifies what they believe to be a questionably ethical position John McCain has taken, then no matter what McCain does in response, the MSNBC on air crew ridicules and mocks McCain anyways.

Example one. It is pretty much acknowledged that McCain won the first verbal joust in Southern California at Saddleback Church between Obama and McCain. The first of three official debates was going to be about international relations, so what did John McCain have to gain by postponing the first debate, nothing. John McCain wanted to postpone the first debate to work on the Bailout bill. MSNBC used this moment to accuse McCain of trying to postpone the first debate because McCain was afraid of debating Barack Obama.

Barack Obama lost the Saddleback meeting yet MSNBC comes out swinging like the Dark Knight from the Monty Python skit, claiming that John McCain is afraid to debate Barack Obama on international topics sounds just like the Dark Knight wanting to keep fighting even after losing all of his limbs.

After slamming McCain for wanting to postpone the debate, MSNBC then slammed McCain for allegedly interfering in the bailout bill and causing it to fail the first time it was voted on! Who is to say how quickly the bailout bill needed to be passed? According to MSNBC, the bailout bill needed to be passed right away and it was McCains fault that it did not pass right away. According to MSNBC, anything McCain did to either hasten or slow down the passage of the bill is simply McCain just interfering where he doesn't belong! Meanwhile, MSNBC reports that Barack Obama deftly handled the Bailout Bill via his Cell Phone. Once again, no matter how McCain had reacted to the bailout bill, MSNBC was there waiting to hammer McCain, MSNBC's disrespect tpwards John McCain is profound and inexcusable.

On to the second debate held a few hours ago. Prior to the debate, Chris Matthews on his own show basically threatened a McCain higher up by trying to expose the Obama / Ayers ties as dirty politics. Matthews pressed over and over asking if McCain would continue with these dirty politics during the debate that night.

After the debate was over and McCain had NOT mentioned the Obama / Ayers angle, Chris Matthews actually accused McCain of being too chicken to call Obama out on the Ayers issue! Matthews would now claim that John McCain was instead willing to leave it up to Sarah Palin and others to do his dirty work for him! Is this not the definition of a Bi-Polar mentality? To first demand a certain result, get that result, and then mercilessly criticize the other person anyways!

Matthews went on to call the Ayers affair "The dog that would not bite" claiming that McCain was too embarrassed to bring up Ayers during the debate and instead would leave the sleazy attacks to the "barracuda", Sarah Palin. Matthews actually stated he thought that was the story of the night!

Not to be outdone, Rachel Maddow actually said what may have been a whole night's idiocy jam packed into one sentence. Maddow claims Barack Obama won the debate by pretending that John McCain was not even there. This is so outrageously Bi-Polar as MSNBC criticized McCain over and over for never looking over to Barack Obama during the prior debate! Talk about a "Gotcha moment", Rachel Maddow wins the "Gotcha, see how bi-polar we are" award for the night.

But wait, there's more! Several months ago Keith Olbermann and guest Jonathan Alter of Newsweek mercilessly attacked and ridiculed John McCain over McCain's very honorable defense of Hillary Clinton's campaign! These two clowns, Olbermann and Alter, spent 4 and a half minutes accusing McCain of losing his mind over a 30 second wonderfully written and spoken tribute to Hillary Clinton by John McCain.

So while the gentle man John McCain is attacked at every turn by MSNBC no matter what the subject, MSNBC also trys to paint McCain as having a temper. Who wouldn't after the idiotic but non stop attacks that McCain has suffered at the hands of MSNBC and their Bi-Polar hosts. I'll never forget MSNBC and what has to go down as the most disgusting tactics by a news channel ever.

The Media can't help itself, first it was Sexism and Ageism, now it's Alaskism

Whenever I overhear Keith Olbermann and his protege Rachel Maddow speak, I am reminded of Snidely Whiplash from the Dudley Do Right Cartoon and Natasha from the Rocky and Squirrel cartoon. Unfortunately, Snidely Whiplash and Natasha were the bad guys. The same can be said about K.O. and R.M. as they calmly tell us how misguided we are if we believe that Sarah Palin is Vice Presidential material.

I've begun to notice a "pattern" among the liberal media this year. First it was sexism and ageism against the Hillary Clinton campaign, then it was ageism against John McCain, now it is Alaskism against Sarah Palin, all emanating from the LIBERAL MEDIA.

Alaskism means the ridiculing of people from another part of the world where it's cold and dark, a lot. Alaskism's come in many forms. Examples include ridiculing people from Alaska for having tanning beds. Superimposing a bikini clad body under the face of the vice presidential candidate is another way to for the liberal media to Alaskism their way merrily along.

Cuddling up with a loved one in cold, cold, Alaska is a no no according to the puritanical liberal media. If cuddling leads to more intimacy which results in a pregnancy, the liberal media will ridicule that. If the cuddlers have had a "secret" abortion, the liberal media will find out and throw it in their faces.

If the cuddlers have the child, the liberal media will throw that in their face as well for having premarital sex. If the cuddlers have a kid and it has downs syndrome, they'll first blame Sarah Palin for improper pre natal care, then when there is an uproar over that insinuation, the liberal media will claim they dropped the story because of the lack of civility from conservatives responding to the story. (Just ask Alan Colmes). It's as if the liberal media thinks they own the topic of sex and can use it at will to ridicule conservatives.

I just don't understand how liberal media types that live in the continental United States feel entitled to judge our Alaskan neighbors with such arrogance and mockery. Imagine what it must be like that whenever you go outside, you are probably bundled up in several extra layers of clothing. Every single time you go outside, you are wearing twice the clothing, go back inside, unbundle. Bundle, unbundle, all day long. The Great Plains states and surrounding areas have very cold winters as well, I just find it odd for the liberal media to so freely and easily ridicule anybody that lives through months upon months of cold weather.

Hey, lets make fun of moose meat, tanning beds, roads to nowhere, or being mayor of a less densely populated region of the planet. We'd better never inhabit the moon or surely the liberal media would ridicule a place that would be even less populated than Alaska. I could see the liberal media about now, "You were mayor on the moon, HA, you governed less than a hundred people, big whoop." That's about how ignorant Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow sound to me these days.

Here's an idea for the liberal media, don't use your pampered lifestyle in posh, comfortable surroundings to judge people who live in cold, dark, places and have more struggles in a single day than you do in a year.

Being liberal this year means throwing everything against a wall and hyping anything that will momentarily stick. Ironically, many Alaskans make their living using that same approach. The difference is Alaskans don't go around judging the rest of us, too bad the liberal media can't do the same as they smugly judge people who live in less densely populated, harsher conditions than themselves.

I can't stand the 2008 liberal media and the only hope we have is to defeat Barack Obama and cleanse the D.N.C. and MSNBC so I can go back to the party that I used to be a staunch support of, the democratic party.

The Creepiness of the Barack Obama Campaign Cult Team Revealed Many Times Over.

First John McCain was ridiculed for not using email, then Sarah Palin's email was hacked. I find it creepy that Barack Obama's side first criticized John McCain for not using email and then shortly thereafter, Sarah Palin's emails are hacked. It's as if the Barack Obama side was saying "how dare John McCain not be hackable because he doesn't use email, we were all set to find something and then release it to the media".

Is it just coincidence that shortly after the Barack Obama camp ridiculed a war hero with a bad arm for not using email that his Vice President's email is hacked?

But wait, there's more.

Barack Obama just held a fundraiser in Hollywood. Price per ticket, 28,500 dollars, Price per pair of tickets, 57 thousand dollars, as in 57 states and Barack Obama's faux pas when he said there were 57 states....

But wait, there's more. When did Barack Obama announce his VP choice, it was at 3:00 am, a direct attack against the 3am ads that Hillary Clinton ran so effectively against Barack Obama in the 2008 democratic race. Yet Hillary Clinton better support Barack Obama or the media will gang up on her.

But wait, there's still more. Right after Hillary Clinton was FORCED into giving a suspension speech by the D.N.C. and the media, the VERY FIRST COMMERCIAL THAT MSNBC RAN after Hillary Clinton's suspenion speech was a commercial promoting the state of Michigan! You know, Michigan, the state that Barack Obama refused to either count or have a revote when it might have mattered.

In my opinion these inside jokes are the work of arrogant, snarky, "better than you", "smarter than you" henchmen and henchwomen that reside deep inside the bowels of the Barack Obama campaign team. They bubble over with a revenge mentality that cannot stand being one upped, ever! The Barack Obama campaign crew represents the perfect blend of Pit Bull and Yorkshire Terrier, the problem is they pretend to be the friendly, caring puppy dog campaign that just wants everybody to get along.

MSNBC Afraid to Fire Keith Olbermann?

It just dawned on me that as annoying as Keith Olbermann has become, the idea of paying the guy to do nothing must really irk MSNBC moreso than firing him. It's too bad MSNBC didn't just remain neutral in this years democratic race.

If MSNBC had remained neutral in this years democratic race, Hillary Clinton would have won an incredibly close contest. Barack Obama would be a rising star within the democratic party with the potential of being a 2 term VP and then a 2 term President. The just completed Denver Convention could have been a combo love in of epic proportions and a tribute to the 90's as well, and an incredible ratings success.



I think MSNBC might be realizing all that they have lost by influencing the democratic nomination process. The ability of Olbermann to counteract the right has been lost amidst ridiculously amped up umbarging against the Clinton camp throughout the campaign. Even Olbermann's taunts against Bill O'Reilly fall flat as whenever I tune into O'Reilly (and I never used to until Keith started reminding me to), O'Reilly is calm, cool, and collected, something Olbermann hasn't been in months.

Olbermann Imploding

Twenty FACTS that PROVE Hillary Clinton should be the Presumptive Democratic Nominee, not Barack Obama.

20 FACTS that support (PROVE) Hillary Clinton should be the presumptive nominee.

FACT: Hillary Clinton won 7 of the 8 biggest states, and 8 out the 10 biggest states. in the country.

FACT: Hillary Clinton won 40 more pledged delegates than Barack Obama among all the primary contests even when Florida and Michigan are not counted..

FACT: Hillary Clinton was leading or tied in MOST of the caucus contests polls just prior to the vote, but lost to Barack Obama by a 2-1 margin in most of these caucuses.

FACT: Three Caucus contests that Barack Obama won by at least a 2-1 margin also held primaries at a later date and ALL showed a GAIN for Hillary Clinton of over 33% versus Barack Obama, thereby making the case for caucus cheating, or at the very least, lack of "Fair Reflection" in the caucus contests.

FACT:Texas is another example in which Hillary Clinton WON the popular vote, and then ONCE AGAIN lost the "two step" and "three step" caucuses BY A TWO to ONE margin!

FACT: During Election Night coverage, MSNBC REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE on air that Hillary Clinton closed to within 2% in the Nebraska Primary after previously losing the Nebraska caucus by a laughably false margin of 37%. When the election night Nebraska Primary results graphic was temporarily up on the screen, Chris Matthews and company IGNORED IT EVERY TIME. The final time the Nebraska graphic was put on the screen, Matthews demanded the Nebraska graphic be taken down and replaced with the West Virginia result from that same night. Instead of talking about two momentum shifting Hillary Clinton successes in one night, MSNBC completely ignored talking about the Nebraska primary result and instead just focused on West Virginia and its "racist, lower income, uneducated base that favored Hillary Clinton".

FACT:Barack Obama picked up many of his super delegates during the time period when he was losing the popular vote and delegate count to Hillary Clinton 53% to 47%.

FACT:Hillary Clinton actually lost super delegates to Barack Obama even as she was winning the final 2 and 1/2 months of the contest both in popular vote and in pledged delegates.

FACT: Hillary Clinton won the Electoral College Map versus Barack Obama by over a hundred votes.

FACT: Hillary Clinton was routinely cheated out of Delegates, at one point beating Barack Obama in 11 out of 12 States but only gaining 5 more overall delegates than Barack Obama. (see image below)


FACT: Howard Dean and John Kerry were financed by Billionaire George Soros in 2004, Bob Richardson and John Edwards were supported by Billionaire George Soros in 2008, Soros has been working behind the scenes to ensure that Barack Obama be declared the democratic nominee irrespective of whether or not he actually won it fairly and squarely.

FACT: Nancy Pelosi was recently outed as giving five figure donations to delegates so they would switch their vote from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama, even in states where Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote.

FACT: George Soros funded Arianna Huffington and Huffington Post, whose pundits would appear on MSNBC and CNN, plus Time and Newsweek, and tear down Hillary Clinton on a daily basis during the campaign season.

FACT: Media headlines demanded that Hillary Clinton suspend her campaign as far back as February, 2008. These headlines continued on a weekly basis until Hillary Clinton finally realized her political career would be ruined if she allowed the media harrassment to continue. To end the political harrassment, Hillary Clinton suspended her campaign. The media immediately proclaimed that Hillary Clinton had voluntarily suspended her campaign.

FACT: Never before has the media demanded that a candidate suspend a presidential campaign prior to the convention, until Hillary Clinton was the candidate.

FACT: Never before has a presidential candidate been pressured to release her delegates prior to a vote at the convention, until Hillary Clinton was the candidate.

FACT:Never before has the media called a presumptive nominee, in a race to close to call, the official nominee before the convention. I believe the networks have left themselves open for a huge lawsuit in this matter.

FACT: Barack Obama has less senatorial, governing, or security experience than any president in the past 120 years.

FACT: hundreds of delegates and super delegates changed their vote to Barack Obama after being for Hillary Clinton because they assumed they were supposed to vote for who might win, not who they wanted to win, because of media pressure.

FACT: Over a hundred Super Delegates and pledged delegates have switched their vote to Barack Obama even thought they thought Hillary Clinton was the better candidate and more likely to win in November against John McCain. (go ahead, ask them who they think is the better candidate)

FACT: A significant number of delegates and super delegates changed their vote to Barack Obama after receiving a "donation" from Barack Obama, even when their congressional district had voted for Hillary Clinton.

FACT: The number one comment about Keith Olbermann that I hear is either, "I used to like that guy", or "I can't believe I used to like that guy". (before Olbermann singlehandily verbally assaulted Clinton on so many occasions we all lost count, and stopped watching). Keith Olbermann looked right into the camera and lied one night when talking about "never having clamored to have Hillary Clinton quit the race".

GEORGE SOROS vs HILLARY CLINTON, Lets not put links to George Soros Related Websites.

Media matters is actually an interesting think tank. However it is backed by George Soros, and that is a BIG Problem.

I think it is important to expose the evil George Soros on my various blogs because the majority of people backing Hillary Clinton know little about him. George Soros is the axis of evil that destroyed Hillary Clinton. George Soros, Move-ON.org, Media Matters, Arianna Huffington and Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, Newseek, and Time magazine.

It is very easy to connect the dots. Arianna Huffington oversaw George Soros Shadow government convention back in 2004. Huffington and Soros have appeared on the same Charlie Rose television show, each promoting their own book. Soros probably bought an hour episode of the Rose Show and gave half of the time to Arianna Huffington. I recall reading that Soros was an initital funder of the Huffington Post, and this is where it gets really really ugly.

Huffington Post supplies both CNN and MSNBC with media Pundits who have drank from the George Soros Kool Aid. CNN, MSNBC, Time and Newsweek all share each others hosts and pundits. They are all on the same team. I have documented in this very blog Jonathan Alter, a senior higher up at Newsweek, and Keith Olbermann conducting a 4 minute barrage against John McCain when all McCain had done was very eloquently point out how Hillary Clinton had been treated horribly by the media. Jonathan Alter link.

Lets Be Careful about linking to George Soros backed blogs or websites.

Ralph Nader comments hit the mark.

Original story at Ralph Nader Partial Transcript from Rocky Mountain News

It was sad watching MSNBC trash Ralph Nader and his comments about Barack Obama's candidacy. MSNBC and its "pundits" called Ralph Nader "out of touch", "craving attention", "comments from an old guy" "out of it", and that the comments were racist.

What Ralph Nader said, in my opinion, was that Barack Obama has been bought by George Soros and Company. Barack will avoid confrontation with anybody that supports or is supported by Soros. Of course MSNBC will be all over Nader and trash him since they are part of the Soros led media takeover.

Rather than being a very popular, maverick candidate with a shining star future in the democratic party whose grass roots candidacy barely lost to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama chose to be owned by George Soros in exchange for the over the top help it gave him against Hillary Clinton. Ralph Nader saw exactly what has happened and how it has compromised Barack Obama and hit a bullseye with his comments.

I believe that the level of media collusion backing George Soros and subsequently supporting each other already exists. Ralph Nader's comments may have been attention getting, but they were right on the mark, Barack Obama is beholden to too many other interests.

George Soros, Huffington Post, MSNBC, MoveOn, Media Matters, Newsweek, and CNN have played favorites politically while claiming to be news oriented non biased media. This is the kind of fraud that needs to be investigated by the FBI.

Here is the transcript of what Nader said from the Rocky Mountain News.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: "Do you see Barack Obama as qualitatively different than Al Gore or any other Democrats. He talks about taking on lobbyists, not taking money directly from lobbyists ... People portray him as being different. Do you see him as being any better than Al Gore or any of the other Democrats that you've opposed over the years?"

Nader: "No. I mean, he's deceiving people. He takes, he takes ... In this very building he would take money from corporate lawyers who are not registered lobbyists but whose desks are across the aisle from corporate lawyers who are registered lobbyists in the same law firm. That has been reported more than once in the mainstream press ... Six out of seven industries, as of a month ago, have given more money to Obama than they have to McCain, only the transportation industry is more equal opportunity corruption.

"Look at the health care industry. It has poured money into his campaign. The securities industry, the defense industry. No.

"There's only one thing different about Barack Obama when it comes to being a Democratic presidential candidate. He's half African-American. Whether that will make any difference, I don't know. I haven't heard him have a strong crackdown on economic exploitation in the ghettos. Payday loans, predatory lending, asbestos, lead. What's keeping him from doing that? Is it because he wants to talk white? He doesn't want to appear like Jesse Jackson? We'll see all that play out in the next few months and if he gets elected afterwards."

"I think his main problem is that he censors himself. He knows exactly who has power, who has too much, who has too little, what needs to be done right down to the community level. But he has bought the advice that if you want to win the election, you better take it easy on the corporate abuses and do X, Y, Z. When I hear that I say, 'Oh, I see. So he's doing all this to win the election, and then he'll be different.

"Well let's see if it worked. Did it work for Mondale? Did it work for Dukakis? Did it work for Clinton? Yes, but only because of Perot? Did it work for Gore? Did it work for Kerry ... ?"

Q: "Do you think he's trying to, what was your term, 'talk white?'"

NADER: "Of course. I mean, first of all, the number one thing that a black American politician aspiring to the presidency should be is to candidly describe the plight of the poor, especially in the inner cities and the rural areas, and have a very detailed platform about how the poor is going to be defended by the law, is going to be protected by the law, and is going to be liberated by the law. Haven't heard a thing.

"I mean, the amount of economic exploitation in the ghettos is shocking. You'd think he'd propose a task force to at least study it. I mean, these people are eroded every day. The kids, bodies are asbestos and lead, municipal services discriminate against them because it's the poor area, including fire and police protection and building code enforcement. And then the lenders, the loan sharks get at them, and the dirty food ends up in the ghettos, like the contaminated meat. It's a dumping ground for shoddy merchandise. You don't see many credit unions there. You don't see many libraries there. You don't see many health clinics there. This is, we're talking 40-50 million Americans who are predominantly African-Americans and Latinos. Anybody see that kind of campaigning? Have you seen him campaign in real poor areas of the city very frequently? No, he doesn't campaign there."

Q: "What do you think the purpose of that is?"

NADER: "He wants to show that he is not a threatening, a political threatening, another politically-threatening African-American politician.

"He wants to appeal to white guilt. You appeal to white guilt not by coming on as a black is beautiful, black is powerful. Basically he's coming on as someone who is not going to threaten the white power structure, whether it's corporate or whether it's simply oligarchic. And they love it. Whites just eat it up."

Terrific Political Pundits can be Found on Cable News Shows, you just have to Look Hard.

It appears to me that the pundits that appear the most regularly on Cable News Shows tend to have an interaction with hosts who are familiar with them. Shtick happens, is one way to describe it. If the hosts are left smiling at the end of their interaction, the guest pundit may be asked back. But what if the pundit is honest, direct, intellectually solid, or just a solid individual not ready to advance the television shows agenda?

There are some really good political pundits who appear on the Cable News Shows. I found two recently that were refreshing.
Mary Frances Berry and Phil Bronstein are two pundits who came off to me as being honest first, and agenda driven last. I probably will start searching out these kind of pundits in the future as they are refreshing to watch.

I'd also like to recognize Pat Buchanan as being a breathe of valid air on MSNBC for being comfortable defending the defendable, even when those that have their own shows think differently. Pat Buchanan has become a valid bull pen guy that saves the game more often than is noticed.

MSNBC HardBall with Chris Matthews Joyfully Discusses whether the Clintons will be House Servants or Field Slaves.

My Heart isn't in to spending an hour or two transcribing Willie Brown's jovially condescending speech about how to "handle Bill Clinton" or the banter that Chris Matthews and Hilary Rosen added in between their laughter at Willie Brown's words.

This exchange happened on Hardball, June 10, 2008. Although the words House Servant and Field Slave were not expressly used, the content pretty much fell into those two categories.

Memo to MSNBC, just because your on air pundits laugh as they spew condescending comments, doesn't make it acceptable, or newsworthy.

Hillary Clinton Forced to Give Suspension Speech to Her Supporters.

The Media Attack spearheaded by George Soros, Huffington Post, and MSNBC against Hillary Clinton took the next step as Hillary Clinton was forced to give a suspension speech to her supporters in support of Barack Obama.

As has been the standard operating procedure for several months, Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann speak with an aire of inevitability, actually creating the news rather than reporting it. The news you see today is the story line Olberman, Matthews, Andrea Mitchell and company at MSNBC, plus Huffington Post, helped initiate several day ago.

Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews moderated the pomp and cirumcumstance as Tim Russert stood by on the sidelines, another victim of the Olbermann and Matthews arrogance that grows by the day.

Nowhere was the term Fair Reflection mentioned as the democratic party goes down the path of letting a billionaire and his proxy Arianna Huffington manipulate and control the democratic party nominating process to a degree never witnessed before.