A message to all the Clinton Haters.

For all you Clinton Haters out there....did you notice that during Bill Clintons two terms in office the YEARLY FEDERAL BUDGET DEFICIT SHRUNK EACH AND EVERY YEAR until it became a surplus.

For all of you Clinton haters, Bill Clinton left office with the highest approval rating of any president since at least 1946, and probably well before that as well.

For all of you Clinton haters, Bill Clinton left office as the only president to have a higher approval rating at the end of his term than the beginning.

See the graphs here.

For all of you Clinton haters, who were pleased at seeing Hillary Clinton defeated by caucus cheating and suspicious donations and the democratic elite plotting against her in 2008, you are now suffering as a result of being a Clinton hater.

Remember that the next time you say you hate a Clinton.

Can you be a ground zero PUMA if you don't still support Hillary Clinton? Part II.

So why did the Democratic Party Higher ups secretly plot against Hillary Clinton during the 2008 presidential election? They believed their chances of retaining their own position in Congress would be strengthened if Barack Obama was elected instead of Hillary Clinton.

The problem with this type of me first, the country second position is two fold. First, it is really selfish to care about one's own political career to the point where you only support a presidential candidate based on a mythical belief that one presidential candidate's speech making ability will help keep you in your office.

Just because a politician may like one candidate's "charisma" more than another, is that enough? "I like this candidate, therefore he will help me keep my seat in Congress?" The answer is a resounding, of course not.

Reason number two on why it is an unknown as to which candidate can help keep any politician in their position. There will usually be an inevitable "push back" two years after a new political party gains control of the white house. In recent times, 2 years into the new presidents term the side that lost seats during the presidential election actually will gain some back.

Ironically, what Pelosi and Reid did may actually backfire on them because they may not have supported the best candidate and are more likely to lose their seat, not less likely as a result.

I'm all for that, that's for sure.

As for the PUMA movement, I would love to see PUMA's who don't necessarily agree with each other to at least consider supporting the idea that anyone who deceived Hillary Clinton in 2008 SHOULD NOT be re-elected, even if it means voting republican in those particular instances.

Linking back to one of this Blogs most intense Articles about the Media Bias and Sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure in 2008.

This article took over a day to put together, plus work over a couple of months collecting various headlines not knowing they would one day be used to create this article.

This one is from Hillary Clinton Forum.net

Linking back to one of this Blogs most intense Articles about the the Media Bias and Sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure in 2008.

This article took over a day to put together, plus work over a couple of months collecting various headlines not knowing they would one day be used to create this article.

This one is from Hillary Clinton Forum.net

Recycling Rev Pfleger's "She's White & Entitled" Speech for Caroline Kennedy. I guess if the "Black Man" says it's Ok to be Entitled, then it's OK.

Since Barack Obama and myself and many others believe in recycling, I thought it might be wise to recycle the Rev Michael Pfleger Entitlement Speech and see how accurately it describes Caroline Kennedy. It sure seems a like more accurate now in describing Caroline Kennedy then it did the first time around describing Hillary Clinton.

Lets end this farce and let Hillary Clinton choose her own successor.

Barack Obama's Latest YouTube Video Still Needs a Bit of Tweaking...

The Lamp is TOO BRIGHT. You need to add a dimmer and dim the light down a tad. This will both give the lampshade some color AND allow the overall image to be brightened a bit more. Right now the image is too dark because the lamp's brightness is either fooling the camera's autoexposure into darkening the image a bit, or the lamp's brightness is not being properly clipped which results in an overall video image that is too dark.

Just trying to be helpful. (Ok it was a regional emmy I won, but that still counts).

Barack Obama's Team Takes my Advice about their YouTube White House Videos. You're Welcome.

....................................Before....................................

...................................After....................................... Directly above are two still video images, in my opinion the second video still is a definite improvement over the one above it (the one at the very top of this article). Many of the flaws I pointed out in a prior article have been corrected to my specifications (hehehe). I might have been the only one on the internet to critique and point out the flaws in Barack Obama's prior youtube videos. I would hope the news media, if they go with this story, credit both HILLARY-WINS.com and http://www.DailyPUMA.com blogs.

Notice the head space has been reduced and the brightness of the flag has been toned down. The wall color too closely matched Barack's own skin color in the prior video and now has been corrected. The background has been changed to blue, with a white center to outline Mr. Obama's head better. The distance to the background and the plant appears to have been increased. The red flat stripes are not as fiery red as before.

The chair is still iffy to me. If the highback of the chair did not grow out of the back of his head, it might make his ears look too big, so they probably can't go any lower with the high back. Anyways, big ears are probably a good thing as it may mean he listens to others moreso than the current president, who seemed to be too busy trying to flag God down for one on ones and appeared to ignore many other capable people's opinons.

Overall this is a huge improvement over the previous youtube videos. You can read my prior article at this link, or, it also reprinted below. Friendly Advice for Barack Obama's YouTube Videos...SIT ON A BOOK!

(Prior article reprinted below)

I don't understand how a president that staged an alleged 200,000 people gathering in Germany can't get his YouTube White House speeches to look, um, normal. The chair back is at precisely the wrong height. The result is I feel like I am looking at a gawky 10th grader.

Sit on a thick Yellow Pages book, Barack. This will instantly do two things, it will lower the chair back in relation to your neck and head to the proper height, and it will also slightly raise you in the frame to the right height. Plus, you get to keep the high back chair for when you want to take a snooze and don't want your neck flopping backwards. Add more space to the back wall from yourself as well.

I only made one change in the framing up above, yet doesn't Barack Obama already look more presidential than before? Keep in mind that in some of the original video, Barack Obama is actually looking up in the frame, I ignored those frames and chose one that benefits him by having his eye line look straight into the camera rather than up.

The american flag should not be at your side, bigger and brighter than you. The flag should be behind you, and not so bright. I'd put the flag where the plant is, and the plant where the flag is.

I'll be watching to see how long it takes for someone to point out these somewhat obviously flawed video design choices and for you to "change" them. Perhaps there is a master plan to start Barack Obama looking like a tenth grader early on, but then over time the framing changes will reveal a more strident, confident, Barack "Zeus" Obama ???

I have a suggestion. Why can't Barack Obama start with his back to us, and spin around like Captain Kirk from the original Star Trek series. To help stimulate the american economy, how about Barack Obama use a different made in america chair each week, and kindly announce where the chair came from. Maybe a pizza gets delivered in the middle of the presentation, name clearly visible on the pizza box.

Just trying to help out.

------------------------------------------------

Edit note, I FORGOT to add one more thing that I originally noticed, but they have now taken care of it. Barack's skin color is far to close to the background wall color, and now the background color has been fixed as well.

Where is my HILLARY CLINTON COMMEMORATIVE COIN, just like the one MSNBC keeps hawking for Barack Obama.

Why is there no commercial for a Hillary Coin? I would buy it. Perhaps the coin could say, 18 million voices silenced by Caucus Cheating, Ageism, and Sexism. Commemoratively speaking, if this type of a coin is not made and sold, then all there will be is a Barack Obama coin out there, and revisionist history takes a step up on what really happened.

Friendly Advice for Barack Obama's YouTube Videos...SIT ON A BOOK!

I don't understand how a president that staged an alleged 200,000 people gathering in Germany can't get his YouTube White House speeches to look, um, normal. The chair back is at precisely the wrong height. The result is I feel like I am looking at a gawky 10th grader.

Sit on a thick Yellow Pages book, Barack. This will instantly do two things, it will lower the chair back in relation to your neck and head to the proper height, and it will also slightly raise you in the frame to the right height. Plus, you get to keep the high back chair for when you want to take a snooze and don't want your neck flopping backwards. Add more space to the back wall from yourself as well.

I only made one change in the framing up above, yet doesn't Barack Obama already look more presidential than before? Keep in mind that in some of the original video, Barack Obama is actually looking up in the frame, I ignored those frames and chose one that benefits him by having his eye line look straight into the camera rather than up.

The american flag should not be at your side, bigger and brighter than you. The flag should be behind you, and not so bright. I'd put the flag where the plant is, and the plant where the flag is.

I'll be watching to see how long it takes for someone to point out these somewhat obviously flawed video design choices and for you to "change" them. Perhaps there is a master plan to start Barack Obama looking like a tenth grader early on, but then over time the framing changes will reveal a more strident, confident, Barack "Zeus" Obama ???

I have a suggestion. Why can't Barack Obama start with his back to us, and spin around like Captain Kirk from the original Star Trek series. To help stimulate the american economy, how about Barack Obama use a different made in america chair each week, and kindly announce where the chair came from. Maybe a pizza gets delivered in the middle of the presentation, name clearly visible on the pizza box.

Just trying to help out.

---------------------

Edit note, I FORGOT to add one more thing that I originally noticed, but they have now taken care of it. Barack's skin color is far to close to the background wall color, and now the background color has been fixed as well.

Rationalizing MSNBC's anti female politician stance...

Is MSNBC's year long assault against female presidential and vice presidential candidates some sort of a rite of passage, a hazing of sorts? Is it possible that MSNBC has raised the bar for female presidential candidates and vice presidential candidates since there has only been one prior female vice presidential candidate, who ironically enough was hazed earlier this year as well. (Geraldine Ferraro).

One could argue that Barack Obama, as an african american presidential candidate, should have been "hazed" just as much if this is the rationalization that MSNBC is using against female politicians. If this article has done anything, it's reminded me that ALL THREE FEMALE VICE PRESIDENT and PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES in this country's entire history were all hazed this year, by MSNBC.

Wow.

Jesse Jackson, Please Free the White People.

The night Barack Obama finished stealing, er winning the 2008 election, (he did both) video was broadcast from all over the country of people joyously crying over Barack Obama's win.

They were crying in a way that kind of disturbed me. It was as if I, as a non-African American, had kept AA's oppressed all these years. Only now that a black president had been elected, would their lives be fulfilled. Only now could all people of all races believe that they too could live the american dream, their white oppressors had finally been vanquished by the election of a black president!

These tears actually disgusted me, and only Jesse Jackson can allay my disgust. You see, Jesse Jackson, at one time, a long long time ago, was an African American democratic presidential candidate. White Iowa Farmers voted for Jesse Jackson during Jesse's quest to become the first black democratic presidential candidate over 30 years ago.

But then a funny thing happened during Jesse Jackson's very long political career. Jesse Jackson, it appears, never passed the African American presidential torch on to the next African American candidate. If I am wrong, please name the name of the African American that Jesse Jackson groomed to become the next AA democratic or republican candidate. (I'll anxiously await the response in the comments section).

My question is, how can white America be "blamed" for it taking this "long" for an AA president when the most prominent African American presidential candidate refused to pass the torch on?

If you watched the news and saw people of all colors crying over the election win of Barack Obama, as if you were somehow responsible that it took this long, you have my blessing to feel disgusted, you should feel disgusted.

Perhaps if these same people had been crying on election night because they knew Barack Obama cheated in the caucus contests, had unparalleled media bias behind him, and collected over 200 million dollars in unmarked bills for his his presidential run, then I could have cried along with them. I too could then share in the pain that the first African American presidential candidate ever to win, would do so under a dark dark cloud of ethical controversy willfully covered up by the mainstream media.

Jessie Jackson, I am asking you, as a healer of people, to take the stigma off of white america by mentioning that maybe, just maybe, your grip on the torch of AA rights issues might have been just a little too snug to pass on.

It was the White People in Barack Obama's backround that were the Worst of All, Did the Media focus only on the Non Whites on Purpose?

I've never been comfortable with all the bashing of Barack Obama's non-white alliances. I guess it took me this long to figure out why. There are many white alliances in Barack Obama's background that have questionable character. George Soros would have to be number one on the list. Arianna Huffington would be number two. Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews tied for third, David Axelrod number four, perhaps Bill Ayers would be fifth, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid tied for sixth, the rest of the MSNBC gang at 7th.

It probably looked racist to Barack Obama supporters for the opposition to be more pre-occupied with the non-whites in Barack Obama's background. Perhaps white people should have just focused on the whites in Barack's background that were behaving in what can easily be seen as questionable behavior.

The sad part is Barack Obama has conocoted a rainbow coalition of people of all colors that have checkered pasts. I think the reason many of the opposition complaints didn't stick was because white detractors of Barack Obama pointed to the non-white people in Barack's past, while letting Barack Obama's shady supporters who were white, off the hook.

Besides the white people mentioned above who I think have behaved in an ethically challenged manner, I should also add all the political losers who were white, that got on the Barack Obama bandwagon to crush the Clintons. These white political losers include Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, John Kerry, Howard Dean, John Edwards and Bill Richardson, ALL of whom have RUN FOR PRESIDENT or the Democratic Presidential nomination, and LOST!

It is an obvious slap in the face to the Clintons and lifelong democratic voters for all of these democratic presidential losers to just throw the Clintons to the curb and support a one term inexperienced senator when Bill Clinton has been the only two term democratic president in the last 50 years.

Think about it, Democratic presidential losers from the past 20 years, all gang up on the ONE AND ONLY democratic presidential winner's family. It's kind of creepy, and speaks to a coup of the democratic party, funded by George Soros.

In a past article I have written fondly of Pastor Wright, I think he is much smarter than Barack Obama. Ironically, above and beyond the issue of the people in Barack Obama's background, there was the issue of very unethical occurrences in this years 15 caucus contests, and the Barack Obama camp accepting over 200 million dollars in undocumented donations, this after rejecting matching funds that prior presidential candidates had all agreed to abide by.

So the question I have is, why didn't whites opposed to Barack Obama's supporters go after Barack Obama's white supporters? lol, there were PLENTY of white backers of Barack Obama that acted highly unethically in this election cycle. I can only begin to guess at the back room deals made and money possibly offered to get several prominent white people to back Barack Obama at the expense of the much better known and respected Clinton family.

I wish I had connected these dots earlier. In a way I did, as I have always tried to focus on caucus cheating issues, the concept of fair reflection denied earlier this year, Obvious media bias led by MSNBC, and sexism. I feel I never was able to reach those that didn't like Barack Obama for his non-white affiliations to find a better reason even when those better reasons existed.

If you are white, and you don't like Barack Obama's rainbow coalition of provocative supporters with questionable backgrounds, you made a mistake by going after the non-white Barack Obama supporters. If you were white, you should have focused on the provocative people backing Barack Obama, who were also white, there were plenty to go around.

Barack Obama receives 200 million dollars in Unmarked Bills, is that the way to run a campaign?

If Barack Obama wins the presidential election, shouldn't he be impeached for the illegal use of undocumented presidential funds in the act of winning the presidential election? Not if Congress is all democratic, then he probably won't have to worry.

Between the way Barack Obama has treated his extended family, and his inability to compete in a fair arena, I don't think Barack Obama is ready to lead. Has Barack Obama ever won anything without ever getting twice the funding or removing his competitor's name from the ballot? Has he?

MSNBC is Manipulating Numbers to try and Deflate John McCain Voters, here is the Statistical Proof.

From what I have read, Barack Obama is absolutely positively going to win California, New York, and Illinois. These three states comprise 22.5 % of all voters. Assuming a current lead for Barack Obama of 8 percentage points, the bigger the current polling margin of victory for Barack Obama in California, New York, and Illinois, the better for John McCain in the remaining 47 states!

Yes, up is down, and down is up.

Lets say that Barack Obama has an overall 8 percentage point lead in national polling of all the states. Lets also say that Barack Obama is leading in California, New York and Illinois by 20%. That means that in the remaining 47 states Barack Obama is only leading by 2.5% of the vote.

But what If the lead in California, New York, and Illinois is even bigger but Barack Obama's overall lead is still 8 percentage points? What if the lead in these three states is actually 33%, then in the remaining 47 states, the two candidates are basically tied in the popular vote!

While it is possible that Barack Obama could win in a landslide, it is also possible that John McCain could win several key states by a very small amount each, and in the process actually win the nomination even while losing the popular vote by several million votes.

What MSNBC is desperately trying to do is demoralize the John McCain base so they don't even bother showing up to vote.

The race is close enough for John McCain to still win, it's just the liberal media trying to get you to give up and not vote that might make Barack Obama a landslide winner instead of a very, very close, loser who wins the popular vote by a few million while losing the electoral college vote to John McCain.

Show us John McCain, Find the mutilator of your own volunteer, if you can't find one stupid Mutilator in Pittsburgh, how can you find Osama Bin Laden?

I'm serious, John McCain, find the mutilator of your own campaign volunteer. If you can't find one mutilator in the city of Pittsburgh, you have no legitimacy, or authority, to lead the search for Osama Bin Laden. Time for the Straight Talk Express to get untracked.



Let's be clear here. The McCain volunteer victim was victimized twice. First they were robbed of 60 dollars at an ATM. The robbery finished, and the victim left, and went to their car. When the thief saw that there was a McCain Palin sticker on the car, the thief came BACK to the victim and carved a B on their face.

This IS AN ACT OF TERRORISM. Both Barack Obama's and John McCain's camp need to be involved on some level and have it solved before they continue campaigning.

At the very least, I would like to see both campaigns actually divert FINANCIAL resources to find the mutilator within 24 hours.

Here is a link to a dissenting viewpoint, looks like a Pro-Obama site but I find their take on it quite the opposite from what was first reported. Dissenting Viewpoint

The Audacity of Pretentiousness, how the Media Worships Barack Obama and the Atrocious Ways he uses the Women who Raised him, for Political Gain.

The media is painting Barack Obama as a saint even as he continues to screw up big time. First Barack Obama did not accept John McCain's proposed suspension of McCain's campaign for a couple of days to deal with the economic bailout proposal. Instead, Barack Obama actually painted John McCain as being afraid to debate him, and that that was the real reason for McCain wanting to suspend his own campaign.

Barack Obama refused to accept John McCain's campaign suspension, and this just shows how inexperienced and inadequate Barack Obama is at negotiating. Barack Obama negotiated with only the present in mind, not even an inkling of what may lay ahead in as short of a time span as two weeks!

Fast Forward two weeks and now Barack Obama is suspending his own campaign to go to Hawaii for a few days, to be with his ill grandmother! This is a big time diplomatic gaffe that the media will refuse to address. You don't ridicule the opposition for wanting a campaign suspension to deal with the economic bail out plan, then take a campaign suspension yourself two weeks later. This just proves that Barack Obama does not know how to negotiate.

To make matters even worse, you don't schedule family illnesses to fit into your own comfort zone, as Barack Obama has done in the past, and now has done again!

Barack Obama, if he was the gentleman and diplomat he is purported to being, would have agreed to the proposed "McCain suspension time out" and taken that same suspension time to go Hawaii to be with his ailing grandmother. Instead Barack Obama timed his visit to his grandmother to when it best suited his own needs. This is a sociopathic pattern of behavior that Barack Obama has practiced before.

In 1995, Barack Obama actually flew over Hawaii, and his dying mother, to go to Bali to finish writing a book about his sperm donor father, even as his mother was in her final months of life battling the insurance companies over health care coverage, and apparently battling them on her own.

During the second debate Barack Obama told the story about his mother dying in a hospital bed alone as she battled the insurance companies over her insurance coverage. Barack never mentions his own role in helping or not helping his mother out during that critical time in her life. So Barack Obama had time to finish writing a book about his sperm donor father, but not enough time to be by his mother's bedside. Barack Obama HAS PROFITED from this story about his mother, respinning it as both a television commercial first during the primaries, and then retelling it during the second debate. Rachel Maddow called it "the moment" from that second debate.

Barack Obama could have written the book about his already passed father at any time, but he only had those precious final months to be with his mother. Yet Barack Obama chose finishing the book about his sperm donor father OVER being with his mother. Between writing his book and and making the political rounds in Chicago, it was as if Barack Obama could not have kept further distance from his dying mother even if he had tried.

Now Barack Obama is CHOOSING WHEN to be with his Grandmother, not when his Grandmother might have needed Barack Obama most. In Barack Obama's world, it's about when others can help him that matters most to him, when it should be the other way around.

Coming Soon, the failed Diplomacy of Barack Obama.

Coming soon, after I take care of my ailing dad. The Audacity of Pretentiousness, how the Media Worships Barack Obama and the Atrocious Ways he uses the Women who Raised him, for Political Gain.

Media falling in line with Barack Obama, could Barack having 3 times more millions to spend have something to do with it?

Barack Obama has over 600 million dollars to spend, that is the kind of money that can smooth over budget problems for a whole lot of media that is tight on money. When John McCain stated he wanted to focus on the bailout mess and cancel the debate, the media backed Barack Obama and accused John McCain afraid to debate Barack Obama.

Then the spin was John McCain was weak on the bailout issue. Now it is just a stream of nonsense coming out of the media because Barack Obama can outspend John McCain 3-1 in all kinds of media buys. Will anybody question Barack Obama on the timing of his trip to see his Grandmother? Why not go to see her when John McCain wanted to suspend his campaingn and deal with the bailout? Why not both candidates at that time, suspend their campaigns for a couple of days and deal with these issues?

Why was it ok for Barack Obama and the mainstream media to ridicule John McCain for wanting to suspend his campaign to go back to Washington, and profit from it in the polls, but ignore his ailing grandmother at that time? Surely the gentlemanly thing, the diplomatic thing to do, would have been to go to Hawaii at the same time that John McCain wanted to go to Washington.

Barack Obama continues to use family illnesses, of both his mother and grandmother, for profit and gain, and the media lets him get away with it. To top it off, the media goes on for days about John McCain dying even as Hillary Clinton was villified for bringing the same possibility regarding Barack Obama just a scant few months ago.

Don't YELL SOCIALIST in a crowded restaurant, it's now illegal if Barack Obama happens to be there.

LA Times Blog Article

Evidently, if Barack Obama comes into a public restaurant for a photo op, and you yell "Socialist, Socialist", you are out of line. Not every place a candidate goes to should be an automatic photo op, unless apparently it is Barack Obama.

But when Lennox Bramble told Diane Fanning, to "be civil, be courteous" after Ms. Fanning yelled that Barack Obama was a Socialist, Mr. Bramble was basically saying "shut up" to Ms. Fanning, and at that point he crossed the line of sexism.

What is so awful about a man telling a woman to be "civil, be courteous"? It's awful because Diane Fanning was making a point, a political point, and that point was belittled by a man. Haven't we had enough sexism in this election year, especially when the man telling the women what is what, is wrong? I admire Ms. Fanning for being able to assess a situation she had no idea she was going to be in, and let her voice be heard.

Bless Diane Fanning for being brave enough to say how she felt. This may be hard for the Obamabots to comprehend, but everywhere that Barack Obama glides above is not necessarily going to be "healed" by his out stretched wingspan, even as the media falsely reports it as another Barack Obama conversion story.

Barack Obama DonorGate Fundraising Mystery, Is Barack Obama electronically set up to get monthly donations from non-existent donors?

Open Secrets.org is a website that tracks political donor funding. One page that I found interesting is this one. Barack Obama Monthly Donation Charts. Anyone can track day by day donations for both Barack Obama and John McCain.

The first thing I noticed when I randomly checked a couple of months was that Barack Obama always had his best donation day on the final day of the month, each and every month. I decided to check out a theory of mine, and I was intrigued when it proved true.

My theory has to do with the sham donations that Barack Obama gets. Nobody knows how many dollars Barack Obama has illegally received, but it has been shown that there are sham names and addresses that actually do give donations to Barack Obama's campaign on a repeating basis.

My hunch is that some entity has set up monthly autopay donations to Barack Obama that kick in on the final day of each calendar month.

I will acknowledge that the Barack Obama team tries to prod its contributors at the end of each month for additional donations, but for some reason, in the month of February, there was no donation "surge" for Barack Obama. February is a curious month to have gotten no end of the month surge as Barack Obama was still battling Hillary Clinton. There was a surge around February 6th, & 7th, and perhaps that minimized the surge later that month. But I doubt that because I would surmise that surge on the 6th and 7th of February was because Barack Obama did well on February 5th, also known as the first Super Tuesday of the election. Now you know the real significance of not counting Michigan in the win column, it helped result in a bigger funding boost for Barack Obama because Michigan's numbers were not counted at that time.

My theory is that there is a network of autopay donations going to Barack Obama that were/are set up for either the 30th or 31st of each month. This results in a huge push going into the next month. However, because February only has 28 days, something went wrong. Maybe Barack Obama's camp messed up in February because February has only 28 days. Or maybe those involved messed up February because Barack Obama moved his headquarters and branched out because of all the caucus contests in February. However, if all it takes is sending out an email to create an end of the month surge in donations, how come the end of February shows no such surge for Barack Obama?

The Open Secrets.org data shows that for every month in 2008, from January through the end of July, Barack Obama's best donation day was always the final day of the month, EXCEPT FOR FEBRUARY. And we're not talking by a little bit, we're talking a MASSIVE increase in political donations on the very last day of every month except for February.

Assuming that the Barack Obama fundraising machine sends out emails at the end of each month asking for another donation, why would the end of February not surge for Barack Obama the way each other month surged?

To those who are trying to track all of the fraudulent donations made to the Barack Obama campaign, I am suggesting to focus on donations that are made on the last day of each month. It sure may be easier trying to look for made up names and addresses if one can focus to one day out of the month instead of every day of the month.

And in case you may be wondering how not counting Michigan affected the race. If Michigan had been in play, Hillary Clinton would not only have won Super Tuesday, but Barack Obama could not have put so many "ground troops" in all the caucus states, some of those people would have had to have been put in Michigan, and the net result would have been that Hillary Clinton would have more decisively won on February 5th and slowed down Barack Obama's influx of money that arrived on the 6th, 7th, and 8th of February, not to mention all the media hoopla Barack Obama got from MSNBC.