Iowa Considers Raincoat Law for Politicians.

(Cat raincoat photo from) Cats.Picturesarehere.com

Iowa is considering a new law that would require all politicians appearing in their state to do so in a yellow raincoat with matching yellow hoodie. "We don't want to be known as the state of perpetual presidential politicking", noted one local official who requested anonymity.

The proposed Iowa yellow raincoat law would require any politician with presidential aspirations to wear the yellow raincoat, (with matching yellow hoodie), the entire time they are in Iowa if their appearance is earlier than 18 months before the next presidential election.

"The law serves a dual purpose," another local official who also requested anonymity, explained,"Iowan's are starting to get a bit embarrassed, and annoyed, by the constant flow of presidential wannabees who come into our state four years before the next election looking for a handout, er support for their presidential run. The Raincoat law identifies a political candidate to Iowans AND it protects the candidate from the elements, you know, thrown tomatoes, lemons, oranges"...

What the anonymous local Iowa officials declined to mention is the yellow raincoat law's best feature, any politician wearing the yellow raincoat (and matching hoodie), who claims to just be passing through the state, won't win very many votes.

Photo and caption from LA TIMES Political Blogger

Barack Obama's Team Takes my Advice about their YouTube White House Videos. You're Welcome.

....................................Before....................................

...................................After....................................... Directly above are two still video images, in my opinion the second video still is a definite improvement over the one above it (the one at the very top of this article). Many of the flaws I pointed out in a prior article have been corrected to my specifications (hehehe). I might have been the only one on the internet to critique and point out the flaws in Barack Obama's prior youtube videos. I would hope the news media, if they go with this story, credit both HILLARY-WINS.com and http://www.DailyPUMA.com blogs.

Notice the head space has been reduced and the brightness of the flag has been toned down. The wall color too closely matched Barack's own skin color in the prior video and now has been corrected. The background has been changed to blue, with a white center to outline Mr. Obama's head better. The distance to the background and the plant appears to have been increased. The red flat stripes are not as fiery red as before.

The chair is still iffy to me. If the highback of the chair did not grow out of the back of his head, it might make his ears look too big, so they probably can't go any lower with the high back. Anyways, big ears are probably a good thing as it may mean he listens to others moreso than the current president, who seemed to be too busy trying to flag God down for one on ones and appeared to ignore many other capable people's opinons.

Overall this is a huge improvement over the previous youtube videos. You can read my prior article at this link, or, it also reprinted below. Friendly Advice for Barack Obama's YouTube Videos...SIT ON A BOOK!

(Prior article reprinted below)

I don't understand how a president that staged an alleged 200,000 people gathering in Germany can't get his YouTube White House speeches to look, um, normal. The chair back is at precisely the wrong height. The result is I feel like I am looking at a gawky 10th grader.

Sit on a thick Yellow Pages book, Barack. This will instantly do two things, it will lower the chair back in relation to your neck and head to the proper height, and it will also slightly raise you in the frame to the right height. Plus, you get to keep the high back chair for when you want to take a snooze and don't want your neck flopping backwards. Add more space to the back wall from yourself as well.

I only made one change in the framing up above, yet doesn't Barack Obama already look more presidential than before? Keep in mind that in some of the original video, Barack Obama is actually looking up in the frame, I ignored those frames and chose one that benefits him by having his eye line look straight into the camera rather than up.

The american flag should not be at your side, bigger and brighter than you. The flag should be behind you, and not so bright. I'd put the flag where the plant is, and the plant where the flag is.

I'll be watching to see how long it takes for someone to point out these somewhat obviously flawed video design choices and for you to "change" them. Perhaps there is a master plan to start Barack Obama looking like a tenth grader early on, but then over time the framing changes will reveal a more strident, confident, Barack "Zeus" Obama ???

I have a suggestion. Why can't Barack Obama start with his back to us, and spin around like Captain Kirk from the original Star Trek series. To help stimulate the american economy, how about Barack Obama use a different made in america chair each week, and kindly announce where the chair came from. Maybe a pizza gets delivered in the middle of the presentation, name clearly visible on the pizza box.

Just trying to help out.

------------------------------------------------

Edit note, I FORGOT to add one more thing that I originally noticed, but they have now taken care of it. Barack's skin color is far to close to the background wall color, and now the background color has been fixed as well.

Where is my HILLARY CLINTON COMMEMORATIVE COIN, just like the one MSNBC keeps hawking for Barack Obama.

Why is there no commercial for a Hillary Coin? I would buy it. Perhaps the coin could say, 18 million voices silenced by Caucus Cheating, Ageism, and Sexism. Commemoratively speaking, if this type of a coin is not made and sold, then all there will be is a Barack Obama coin out there, and revisionist history takes a step up on what really happened.

Friendly Advice for Barack Obama's YouTube Videos...SIT ON A BOOK!

I don't understand how a president that staged an alleged 200,000 people gathering in Germany can't get his YouTube White House speeches to look, um, normal. The chair back is at precisely the wrong height. The result is I feel like I am looking at a gawky 10th grader.

Sit on a thick Yellow Pages book, Barack. This will instantly do two things, it will lower the chair back in relation to your neck and head to the proper height, and it will also slightly raise you in the frame to the right height. Plus, you get to keep the high back chair for when you want to take a snooze and don't want your neck flopping backwards. Add more space to the back wall from yourself as well.

I only made one change in the framing up above, yet doesn't Barack Obama already look more presidential than before? Keep in mind that in some of the original video, Barack Obama is actually looking up in the frame, I ignored those frames and chose one that benefits him by having his eye line look straight into the camera rather than up.

The american flag should not be at your side, bigger and brighter than you. The flag should be behind you, and not so bright. I'd put the flag where the plant is, and the plant where the flag is.

I'll be watching to see how long it takes for someone to point out these somewhat obviously flawed video design choices and for you to "change" them. Perhaps there is a master plan to start Barack Obama looking like a tenth grader early on, but then over time the framing changes will reveal a more strident, confident, Barack "Zeus" Obama ???

I have a suggestion. Why can't Barack Obama start with his back to us, and spin around like Captain Kirk from the original Star Trek series. To help stimulate the american economy, how about Barack Obama use a different made in america chair each week, and kindly announce where the chair came from. Maybe a pizza gets delivered in the middle of the presentation, name clearly visible on the pizza box.

Just trying to help out.

---------------------

Edit note, I FORGOT to add one more thing that I originally noticed, but they have now taken care of it. Barack's skin color is far to close to the background wall color, and now the background color has been fixed as well.

Why is Sarah Palin's Wardrobe STILL a BIGGER ISSUE than Barack Obama accepting over 200 million dollars in Undocumented Campaign Contributions?

I just don't understand the Sarah Palin Wardrobe Controversy. Well, maybe I do, and the reason is reminding me why the PUMA movement cannot end even if Hillary Clinton ends up in the Barack Obama cabinet. Under no circumstance can I ever believe that what was spent on Sarah Palin's Wardrobe matters anywhere near as much as the amount of money Barack Obama's camp laundered during this entire campaign process.

Over time, the mainstream media will keep banging the drum over Sarah Palin's wardrobe, while simultaneously virtually no attention will be spent on Barack Obama's camp collecting and spending over 200 million dollar's in undocumented funds. Just today, Rachel Maddow had the gall to giddily proclaim that John McCain's McCain Feingold act was being stomped upon by the Republican party.

Well, what do you expect Maddow. Barack Obama's camp spat on the very concept of campaign finance fairness and you choose to ridicule the good guys. Guess what Maddow, your people aren't always above reproach.

Was MSNBC's Africa Launch, Jan 20, 2008 another reason for MSNBC to back Barack Obama?

An additional motivating factor for MSNBC to back Barack Obama over HIllary Clinton, the MSNBC launch in Africa of Free Satellite TV back in January of this this year. Here is a link to the story, the timing of the MSNBC launch was very fascinating. MSNBC Free TV to Africa Launched Jan 20, 2008.

Rationalizing MSNBC's anti female politician stance...

Is MSNBC's year long assault against female presidential and vice presidential candidates some sort of a rite of passage, a hazing of sorts? Is it possible that MSNBC has raised the bar for female presidential candidates and vice presidential candidates since there has only been one prior female vice presidential candidate, who ironically enough was hazed earlier this year as well. (Geraldine Ferraro).

One could argue that Barack Obama, as an african american presidential candidate, should have been "hazed" just as much if this is the rationalization that MSNBC is using against female politicians. If this article has done anything, it's reminded me that ALL THREE FEMALE VICE PRESIDENT and PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES in this country's entire history were all hazed this year, by MSNBC.

Wow.

Keith Olbermann perfects the Opratorial, and "Spews" will never be the same.

Keith Olbermann of MSNBC's The Three Tenners (also featuring sidekicks Matthews and Maddow) has officially perfected the Opratorial. The Opratorial is the fusing of a viewpoint on a issue, with loud, bellicose, red faced, salvia spewing, calm discourse.

What can make an Olbermann Opratorial so shrillbinding is Olberman's ability, (or inability) to sporn an impacted range of "you've got to be kidding me" wrapped within a verbal onslaught of, "you've got to be kidding me", served on a platter of, "you've got to be kidding me".

Just when you thought Olbermann's whining, whimpering, whacked a mole verbosity has reached a crescendo and could not possibly be topped, Keitho the Klown calmly takes a quick deep breath, and continues; a little redder in the face perhaps, an oxygen mask just out of view, ready to drop down and provide aid upon the completion of his opratory. (I've often wondered why MSNBC doesn't provide it's poor poor viewers with their own oxygen masks as well).

No Olbermann Opratorial would be complete without a reference to an arch rival, and Olbermann keeps his arch rival, Billo the Clown, within spewing distance, a key to any successful Opratorial that can't stand on its own merit. It has been rumored that Keith Olbermann warms up for his Opratorials by stepping on lawn rakes that pop up and hit him unmercilessly in the face.

Olbermann's ability to pass the rake in the face sensation on to his viewers is becoming legendary.

Jesse Jackson, Please Free the White People.

The night Barack Obama finished stealing, er winning the 2008 election, (he did both) video was broadcast from all over the country of people joyously crying over Barack Obama's win.

They were crying in a way that kind of disturbed me. It was as if I, as a non-African American, had kept AA's oppressed all these years. Only now that a black president had been elected, would their lives be fulfilled. Only now could all people of all races believe that they too could live the american dream, their white oppressors had finally been vanquished by the election of a black president!

These tears actually disgusted me, and only Jesse Jackson can allay my disgust. You see, Jesse Jackson, at one time, a long long time ago, was an African American democratic presidential candidate. White Iowa Farmers voted for Jesse Jackson during Jesse's quest to become the first black democratic presidential candidate over 30 years ago.

But then a funny thing happened during Jesse Jackson's very long political career. Jesse Jackson, it appears, never passed the African American presidential torch on to the next African American candidate. If I am wrong, please name the name of the African American that Jesse Jackson groomed to become the next AA democratic or republican candidate. (I'll anxiously await the response in the comments section).

My question is, how can white America be "blamed" for it taking this "long" for an AA president when the most prominent African American presidential candidate refused to pass the torch on?

If you watched the news and saw people of all colors crying over the election win of Barack Obama, as if you were somehow responsible that it took this long, you have my blessing to feel disgusted, you should feel disgusted.

Perhaps if these same people had been crying on election night because they knew Barack Obama cheated in the caucus contests, had unparalleled media bias behind him, and collected over 200 million dollars in unmarked bills for his his presidential run, then I could have cried along with them. I too could then share in the pain that the first African American presidential candidate ever to win, would do so under a dark dark cloud of ethical controversy willfully covered up by the mainstream media.

Jessie Jackson, I am asking you, as a healer of people, to take the stigma off of white america by mentioning that maybe, just maybe, your grip on the torch of AA rights issues might have been just a little too snug to pass on.

DailyPUMA is now ONLINE!

DailyPUMA fills an important internet niche in PUMA LAND and those who desire a different interpretation from the day to day news than what the mainstream media offers.

NewsMax Reports about the Polling Inaccuracies that favored the Democrats, 10 DAYS after I WARNED about it on this HILLARY-WINS Blog.

Just as I predicted 10 days ago, MSNBC is Manipulating Numbers to try and Deflate John McCain Voters, here is the Statistical Proof. and NEWSMAX confirmed today, 10 days later, NewsMax Report on Polling Inflation, the polling institutions were inaccurate in their polling of this years presidential race between Barack Obama and John McCain.

I have never implied that John McCain was going to win the popular vote, but I knew there was a chance he could win the electoral college vote. I had predicted 10 days ago that polling states such as New York, Pennsylvania and California, would overinflate Barack Obama's overall lead in the rest of the states, and in the process demoralize Republican voters, Hillary Clinton supporters, and undecided independents.

This trend against John McCain re-accelerated (after the stock market crash) with the 'BIG TEN" polling a couple of weeks back that predicted incredibly large leads for Barack Obama. A law needs to be passed in regards to polls that are taken. I want to KNOW THE AVERAGE AGE of the pollsters who are actually conducting the interviews.

I bet if we could go back and review the age of the pollsters, we would find a skew that is age related. I'm pretty sure the Big Ten polling used college aged pollsters, who no doubt connected with other college aged kids in their polling.

The end result was all of these polls gave Barack Obama almost a 3 percentage point boost, and that no doubt made a pscyhological difference to millions of voters as to whether or not they would vote.

Once again, you heard it here 10 days ago, NewsMax confirmed it today.

It was the White People in Barack Obama's backround that were the Worst of All, Did the Media focus only on the Non Whites on Purpose?

I've never been comfortable with all the bashing of Barack Obama's non-white alliances. I guess it took me this long to figure out why. There are many white alliances in Barack Obama's background that have questionable character. George Soros would have to be number one on the list. Arianna Huffington would be number two. Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews tied for third, David Axelrod number four, perhaps Bill Ayers would be fifth, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid tied for sixth, the rest of the MSNBC gang at 7th.

It probably looked racist to Barack Obama supporters for the opposition to be more pre-occupied with the non-whites in Barack Obama's background. Perhaps white people should have just focused on the whites in Barack's background that were behaving in what can easily be seen as questionable behavior.

The sad part is Barack Obama has conocoted a rainbow coalition of people of all colors that have checkered pasts. I think the reason many of the opposition complaints didn't stick was because white detractors of Barack Obama pointed to the non-white people in Barack's past, while letting Barack Obama's shady supporters who were white, off the hook.

Besides the white people mentioned above who I think have behaved in an ethically challenged manner, I should also add all the political losers who were white, that got on the Barack Obama bandwagon to crush the Clintons. These white political losers include Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, John Kerry, Howard Dean, John Edwards and Bill Richardson, ALL of whom have RUN FOR PRESIDENT or the Democratic Presidential nomination, and LOST!

It is an obvious slap in the face to the Clintons and lifelong democratic voters for all of these democratic presidential losers to just throw the Clintons to the curb and support a one term inexperienced senator when Bill Clinton has been the only two term democratic president in the last 50 years.

Think about it, Democratic presidential losers from the past 20 years, all gang up on the ONE AND ONLY democratic presidential winner's family. It's kind of creepy, and speaks to a coup of the democratic party, funded by George Soros.

In a past article I have written fondly of Pastor Wright, I think he is much smarter than Barack Obama. Ironically, above and beyond the issue of the people in Barack Obama's background, there was the issue of very unethical occurrences in this years 15 caucus contests, and the Barack Obama camp accepting over 200 million dollars in undocumented donations, this after rejecting matching funds that prior presidential candidates had all agreed to abide by.

So the question I have is, why didn't whites opposed to Barack Obama's supporters go after Barack Obama's white supporters? lol, there were PLENTY of white backers of Barack Obama that acted highly unethically in this election cycle. I can only begin to guess at the back room deals made and money possibly offered to get several prominent white people to back Barack Obama at the expense of the much better known and respected Clinton family.

I wish I had connected these dots earlier. In a way I did, as I have always tried to focus on caucus cheating issues, the concept of fair reflection denied earlier this year, Obvious media bias led by MSNBC, and sexism. I feel I never was able to reach those that didn't like Barack Obama for his non-white affiliations to find a better reason even when those better reasons existed.

If you are white, and you don't like Barack Obama's rainbow coalition of provocative supporters with questionable backgrounds, you made a mistake by going after the non-white Barack Obama supporters. If you were white, you should have focused on the provocative people backing Barack Obama, who were also white, there were plenty to go around.

Sarah Palin Exonerated in Trooper Gate case! Just like this blog told you two weeks ago!

LA TIMES link

I called this three weeks ago.

Trooper Gate Blog Article

And the spokesperson for Palin basically gave the same reasons I gave back then, Palin is allowed to keep the best people in the best place, that is what she does as governor.

Barack Obama receives 200 million dollars in Unmarked Bills, is that the way to run a campaign?

If Barack Obama wins the presidential election, shouldn't he be impeached for the illegal use of undocumented presidential funds in the act of winning the presidential election? Not if Congress is all democratic, then he probably won't have to worry.

Between the way Barack Obama has treated his extended family, and his inability to compete in a fair arena, I don't think Barack Obama is ready to lead. Has Barack Obama ever won anything without ever getting twice the funding or removing his competitor's name from the ballot? Has he?