There They Go Again, Vanity Fair Assuming the Unassumable about the Caucus State Results.

Vanity Fair Article on Hillary Clinton

I'm just going to point out how another "in depth" article once again fails to question the validity of the caucus state voting and instead just calls it a "stunning 11 victories in a row for Barack Obama". It's just nonsense. Why did Edwards get out just before all of these caucuses when he had a chance to get some decent delegate counts? Where did all of the Edwards caucus support go since he had dropped out of the race just before all of these races?

The answer my friend, is blowing in the wind. It's called collusion, sexism, and ageism, and Barack Obama, Bob Richardson, and Edwards should be ashamed for being a part of it.

UnFair Rejection. How the Democratic Party Ignored the Reality of "Fair Reflection" and Hillary Clinton's Advantage over Barack Obama.

These are the Great Plain Caucus States that Barack Obama used to build his insurmountable lead back in February of 2008. But did the margin of victory in these 9 caucus state victories offer a "fair reflection" of the voters in those states?

The final two races in the Great Plains region were not caucus races, but primary races instead. Suddenly, Barack Obama's 2-1 margin of victory in the Caucus States was reduced to an almost identical 50-50 popular vote split for both Montana and South Dakota.

This is clear evidence that the caucus states did not provide "Fair Reflection" of the voters of their states. Fair Reflection is a tenet that the Democratic party has chosen to ignore this year, and may alienate some of their own democratic voter base because of it.

Meanwhile the american media REFUSES to even mention the word Fair Reflection nor delve head on into this issue.