There They Go Again, Vanity Fair Assuming the Unassumable about the Caucus State Results.

Vanity Fair Article on Hillary Clinton

I'm just going to point out how another "in depth" article once again fails to question the validity of the caucus state voting and instead just calls it a "stunning 11 victories in a row for Barack Obama". It's just nonsense. Why did Edwards get out just before all of these caucuses when he had a chance to get some decent delegate counts? Where did all of the Edwards caucus support go since he had dropped out of the race just before all of these races?

The answer my friend, is blowing in the wind. It's called collusion, sexism, and ageism, and Barack Obama, Bob Richardson, and Edwards should be ashamed for being a part of it.

Barack Obama's Sleazy Deal, the Real Reason Barack Obama Took his Name off of the Michigan Ballot!

I don't mind that Barack Obama is a slick backroom deal negotiator. I do mind that Barack Obama has lured millions of younger voters with his message of "change" when in fact Barack Obama is the ultimate backroom deal flim flam man negotiator.

Barack Obama took his name off of the Michigan Ballot to please Iowa caucus voters.

Iowa and New Hampshire are feeling pressure from many other states that want to usurp their place as the first two places that presidential candidates campaign in when the party nominations begin.

Barack Obama made a decision to take his name off of the Michigan ballot to please the Iowa voters. The plan worked to perfection as Hillary Clinton spent double what she originally intended to spend in Iowa, and still finished third.

It appears to me that Barack Obama made a decision to remove his name from the Michigan ballot specifically to gain an early edge over Hillary Clinton in Iowa, and the plan worked to perfection.

Barack Obama formed a secret alliance with John Edwards and Bill Richardson to share and exchange caucus votes. If Obama, Richardson or Edwards had "extra" caucus voters showing up at a specific caucus voting precinct, the extra voters would be exchanged among these three to ensure that they all finished in the top four in voting, So if Edwards runs strong in a specific precinct, he could give away some of his extra voters to either Obama or Richardson. By exchanging surplus voters the three could ensure they always finished among the top four (Hillary being the odd man, er, woman, out), making all three eligible for government funds.

In exchange for what I call "The Michigan Shenanigan", Barack SHOULD LOSE ALL OF HIS DELEGATES IN MICHIGAN and get NO delegates other than the ones he would get from among the uncommitted, which actually would have amounted to a significant amount, just not as many as Barack ended up getting. How the democratic party took pity on Barack for his deviousness is something only they can answer.

Barack Obama has Already Sunk his own Cause.

As I analyze the month by month goings on in this years democratic election, I find Barack Obama has never failed to choose mathematically elevatng his chances of becoming president, even if the mathematical tactics alienate tens of millions of voters. All along, at every bend where Barack Obama could manipulate a result in his favor, he and his handlers have taken the opportunity and run with it.

Knowing that he would lose in both Michigan and Florida, Barack agreed to "not let those states count". Somehow the media actually gives Barrack Obama kudos for nobly agreeing not to let two huge states votes count, states that he was going to lose in. Pundits actually think that Barack did some kind of amazing gesture by taking his name off the ballot in Michigan. If Hillary Clinton had done that, the pundits would be laughing at her and her lack of judgement. But Barack Obama does it and it is lauded as a pro party act. Why didn't Hillary take her name off of the ballot back in January? Why did Barack? Barack did because any state that he won't get a majority vote in is a state that shall be called "denial".

Never mind that Barack Obama ran cable televison ads a week or two leading up to the elections in Florida. This tactic by the Obama camp has become known as the "Hedge your bet" maneuver. The Obama camp is constantly hedging their bets. Anything that favors Hillary MUST BE DENIED or called racist, and anything that favors Barack Obama is due to hard work and planning, and never to his outspending Hiillary in every state they compete in, or to cheating of the kind that went on in the caucus states.

After Barack Obama decided to let the votes of Michigan and Florida only count when they can no longer have an affect on the outcome of the race, came the caucuses of February. In as many as four or five caucuses, Barack Obama received a 30% margin of victory in states that were virtually tied in the polls that preceded the votes. Once again, the math matters more to Barack Obama then the disenfranchisement of millions of democratic voters who simply want their vote fairly represented in the caucus states.

Then came Ohio and Texas, in which Barack Obama was able to lose the popular vote in Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island, but gleefully chortle that Hillary barely made a dent in the delegate race because of the caucus shenanigans of Texas.

Next was a solid Pennsylvania win for Hillary Clinton, with the Obama people claiming that since Barack drove down a 20-25 point lead to 10 points, it could hardly be called a victory. Never mind that Obama outspent Hillary 3-1 in Pennsylvania. Then the exact opposite situation happened in North Carolina.

North Carolina ended up being a virtual identical rehash of the Pennsylvania race, but in reverse. But once again the media and Barack uses math to somehow claim that his victory in North Carolina was a back breaker, even though Hillary won Indiana, which had been deemed the tiebreaker several weeks earlier but suddenly it was as if that had never been said by Barack.

Then came a shockingly huge win in West Virginia for Hillary Clinton, in which once again, Barack Obama tried to overshadow the results by playing the John Edwards card. Time and time again the media and Barack Obama have played the numbers card, this time equating John Edwards and his 18 delegates as more meaningful than Hillary's win in West Virginia.

The perpetual use of numbers in an attempt to obfuscate the reality that Barack does not have a true democratic majority will probably just alienate many middle aged and older democrats. Don't be surprised if many of the young, thuggish internet egg heads that helped steal the caucus state vote for Barack Obama while also rationalizing not counting Florida and Michigan actually alienate many, many long time democrats in this years fall election.

If there was still time, Hillary Clinton could probably run as an independent this fall, and gain the most votes of any of the three candidates.

Same Sex Marriage Approved By California Supreme Court.

Same Sex Marriage Approved By California Supreme Court.

Congratulations guys for coming out of the closet (not that there's anything wrong with that). However, it's too little too late.

In case anyone feels I am mocking the California Supreme Court's ruling today over same sex marriage, I am not.

I am actually mocking the attempt by the Barack Obama camp to try and overshadow Hillary Clinton's 41 point margin of victory in West Virginia, and the Nebraska primary vote, by introducing John Edwards the day after Hillary's huge victories.

The Edwards announcement was not a momentum changer, it was just touted as one by the media as an excuse to stop talking about West Virginia. The media never even got around to mentioning that in Nebraska Hillary Clinton only lost by two points in the Nebraska primary, a stark difference to the 35% point loss Hillary suffered at the hands of a cheating Barack Obama in the Nebraska caucus vote.

Let us not also forget the Washington State primary, which showed a 30 point margin of victory REDUCTION from their previous caucus vote. Barack Obama's caucus state wins are ALL TAINTED, and the mathematical proof is becoming more and more self evident with each passing day.