UnFair Rejection. How the Democratic Party Ignored the Reality of "Fair Reflection" and Hillary Clinton's Advantage over Barack Obama.

These are the Great Plain Caucus States that Barack Obama used to build his insurmountable lead back in February of 2008. But did the margin of victory in these 9 caucus state victories offer a "fair reflection" of the voters in those states?

The final two races in the Great Plains region were not caucus races, but primary races instead. Suddenly, Barack Obama's 2-1 margin of victory in the Caucus States was reduced to an almost identical 50-50 popular vote split for both Montana and South Dakota.

This is clear evidence that the caucus states did not provide "Fair Reflection" of the voters of their states. Fair Reflection is a tenet that the Democratic party has chosen to ignore this year, and may alienate some of their own democratic voter base because of it.

Meanwhile the american media REFUSES to even mention the word Fair Reflection nor delve head on into this issue.

It's NOT over! Hillary Clinton Comes from Behind to Cruise Past Barack Obama in South Dakota.

Hillary Clinton was supposed to lose South Dakota by 8-10 points... ...instead Hillary Clinton can add another RESOUNDING victory to her ever growing list of primary victories.

The Presumptive Nominee, Barack Obama, for the next several months must deflect attention from the cheating that went on in the Caucus State voting on his behalf before he can wrongfully steal that which he did not truthfully earn.

Please notice that this win was smack dab in the middle of where Obama won a bunch of caucus state elections. One more piece of evidence that the caucus state votes were so out of alignment that cheating went on, and that is what has cost Hillary Clinton the Nomination.

Let us hope the truth sets Barack Obama free to do the right thing before Denver.