Oprah Winfrey first helps remove Hillary Clinton from the democratic race, then tries to lead the way forward for all women on her television show.

I consider Oprah Winfrey to be a thug. First Oprah helped disable Hillary Clinton's campaign by exerting all of her influence to help Barack Obama win the democratic nomination. After that mission was accomplished, Oprah has now taken the mantle of progressing women's rights!

This past week Oprah had a show featuring women leaders such as Billie Jean King, Maria Shriver, Gloria Steinem, the Williams sisters, Serena and Venus. The purpose of this particular show was to inspire a new generation of young females to greatness.

Where was Hillary Clinton, Oprah?

I guess having the number one female achiever on your show after you directly assisted in taking her out of the democratic presidential race by you only supporting Barack Obama, wouldn't look too good, would it?

I just find Oprah Winfrey to be a thug who just wants it all to go her way. Oprah's recent show about women leaders could not feature Hillary Clinton, which just shows the political blood that is on Oprah Winfrey's hands. Try and wash it off Oprah by doing the show without Hillary Clinton, I'm here to say, you are busted.

Oprah Winfrey's thuggish act of narcissism reveals her desire to be remembered long after her show goes off the air.

How Oprah Winfrey and George Soros have influence peddled this year while conservatives such as Dr. Laura stay on the sidelines.

What I have found most offensive about this years presidential race has been the interfering by rich or powerful celebrities during the democratic nominating process. George Soros and Oprah Winfrey have added their influence to this year's democratic race and in the process may have harmed the sovereignty of future presidential races.

I believe up until this year there has been an unstated "gentleman's agreement" that the real influential power would hold back some of their power until after our two main political parties had their millions of voters vote for their favorite candidate. An example of this type of situation would be John McCain only having 1% of the vote less than one year ago, yet coming back to win the Republican nomination.

However, on the democratic side, the democrats seemed to have ripped up the playbook and did everything in their power to help Barack Obama win at all costs. This Barack must win strategy has created a new problem. Why should either political side wait for 30 million voters to help decide who is the nominee when overzealous help early on by the rich and powerful can pretty much lock up the nomination before the voters get to vote?

I believe the evidence in the 2008 presidential race shows that the conservative side basically allowed the existing candidates to legitimately battle each other, and once John McCain was elected, they rallied around him. On the democratic side, interveners like Oprah Winfrey and George Soros, rather than wait until 35 million democrats decided who would be the nominee, decided to manipulate who would actually get the democratic nomination before 35 million democratic voters voted.

This is actually a serious issue.

If Oprah Winfrey and George Soros are successful in their quest to dictate who is the democratic nominee prior to 35 million democrats voting, it will only get worse in future elections. Although I don't know how much Dr. Laura could have influenced this year's election, it is sad to see democrats such as George Soros and Oprah Winfrey lowering the bar to the point where it will no doubt contaminate the electoral process from now on, meanwhile Dr. Laura remains rather quiet and does not use her show or celebrity to manipulate voters the way Oprah Winfrey has shamelessly been doing for over a year now.

I wish for Barack Obama to lose so that the rich and powerful don't believe they are above all others when it comes to influence peddling who will be each political parties nominee.