The Creepiness of the Barack Obama Campaign Cult Team Revealed Many Times Over.

First John McCain was ridiculed for not using email, then Sarah Palin's email was hacked. I find it creepy that Barack Obama's side first criticized John McCain for not using email and then shortly thereafter, Sarah Palin's emails are hacked. It's as if the Barack Obama side was saying "how dare John McCain not be hackable because he doesn't use email, we were all set to find something and then release it to the media".

Is it just coincidence that shortly after the Barack Obama camp ridiculed a war hero with a bad arm for not using email that his Vice President's email is hacked?

But wait, there's more.

Barack Obama just held a fundraiser in Hollywood. Price per ticket, 28,500 dollars, Price per pair of tickets, 57 thousand dollars, as in 57 states and Barack Obama's faux pas when he said there were 57 states....

But wait, there's more. When did Barack Obama announce his VP choice, it was at 3:00 am, a direct attack against the 3am ads that Hillary Clinton ran so effectively against Barack Obama in the 2008 democratic race. Yet Hillary Clinton better support Barack Obama or the media will gang up on her.

But wait, there's still more. Right after Hillary Clinton was FORCED into giving a suspension speech by the D.N.C. and the media, the VERY FIRST COMMERCIAL THAT MSNBC RAN after Hillary Clinton's suspenion speech was a commercial promoting the state of Michigan! You know, Michigan, the state that Barack Obama refused to either count or have a revote when it might have mattered.

In my opinion these inside jokes are the work of arrogant, snarky, "better than you", "smarter than you" henchmen and henchwomen that reside deep inside the bowels of the Barack Obama campaign team. They bubble over with a revenge mentality that cannot stand being one upped, ever! The Barack Obama campaign crew represents the perfect blend of Pit Bull and Yorkshire Terrier, the problem is they pretend to be the friendly, caring puppy dog campaign that just wants everybody to get along.

The Comedy of Sarah Palin and how she got Barack Obama's Goat.

If there was one thing John McCain could do to dig a burr into the Barack Obama camp's backside, it was to select Sarah Palin as his V.P.

What I find so comical is Sarah Palin is to Barack Obama exactly what Barack Obama was to Hillary Clinton during the 2008 democratic contest. Not only are the parallels a giggle to nowhere, witnessing Barack Obama's reaction to Sarah Palin enter the race has been very enlightening.

Several months back Pastor Michael Pfleger mockingly spoke of Hillary Clinton as feeling "entitled" to the Democratic nomination (click on link to see video) Pastor Pfegler Mocks Hillary Clinton. The Pfegler line many may never forget was... "there's a black man stealing my show.'' Did you ever imagine that that very video would boomerang against Barack Obama several months later?

If you watch this youtube video of Pfegler ridiculing Hillary Clinton, Pastor Pfegler Mocks Hillary Clinton, just imagine it's a new video that a Pfegler clone has released in which he ridicules Barack Obama's reaction to Sarah Palin. ..."There was Barack Obama, the chosen one, heading for the presidency, and suddenly there's this Hootchy Hockey Mama from Alaska, and she's stealing my show"....

(by the way, you youtube wannabe's, ahem, hint hint).

The arrogant and condescending reaction to Sarah Palin that Barack Obama and his side is demonstrating towards Palin is exactly how both Barack Obama and Pastor Pfegler treated Hillary Clinton earlier this year. While this ironic joke is now playing out against Barack Obama, the bigger joke is, Barack Obama and his followers still don't get it. The audacity of arrogance and lack of fair reflection that helped Barack Obama "win" against Hillary Clinton now blocks his path towards the White House.

How can I want a group in power that is so proud of themselves they don't get it when they receive the same condescending medicine that they normally are doling out?

Dare I even bring up the whole dying thing as well? Jack Cafferty of CNN stated several months ago that Hillary Clinton should get out of the race over the Kennedy Assassination comment she made, yet we constantly are now reminded that John McCain could pass on, even as we see his 96 year old mother cheering him on.

It's Ok to talk about McCain passing on, but not Barack Obama? According to the Barack Obama camp, yes.

All of this has me wondering just who started putting lipstick on a pig, first?

Donna Brazille embraces the role of Slave Master.

(Updated Nov. 3, 2017 to fix link and formatting.)

I found this article on the TaylorMarsh Archives.

Donna Brazile email posted on Taylor Marsh

Here are two Donna Brazile quotes that I find amazing.

DB: "I defended the Clintons and it was Black people who kept their asses in office."

and

DB: "Blacks have been deeply wounded by the duplicity of the Clintons. Now, you may not like it or agree. But as a black person who helped saved the Clinton presidency, please just respect what I am saying. [emphasis added] Again, you disagree. But, I honestly believe the wounds will not heal. It’s personal and the Clintons have shown their darker demons." [emphasis added]

Wow Oh Wow, does Donna Brazile live inside her head and her head only, or is she just insane? This type of attitude and hostility is EXACTLY WHY REPARATIONS are an INSULT to ALL AMERICANS. Donna Brazile believes she OWNS the Clintons because she "saved them".

The people that are the angriest about slavery now are probably the same people who would have been slave owners if the situation had been reversed, with one big difference, they would have advocated the destruction of anyone who would have been for reparations. I don't advocate Donna Brazile's destruction, but I do pity the fool.

Donna Brazile wants to be head of the D.N.C., can there be a bigger reason to not support the D.N.C. than Donna Brazile?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Donna Brazile is for Obama

guest post by Masslib

For the last several months it’s been pretty obvious to anyone who watches CNN, that "neutral" commentator Donna Brazile actually harbors anti-Hillary feelings, if not an outright preference for Obama. CNN decided to bench pundit James Carville because of his pro-Clinton bias. Maybe CNN doesn’t yet believe that Brazile has taken sides. Bothered by her obvious bias, last month I began an e-mail correspondence with Brazile to express my disappointment in her as a DNC leader. I share some of what she wrote back to me below. If CNN doesn’t pull the plug on her after they read this, then Saturday Night Live was right when they said CNN was in the tank for Obama.

I’m making these e-mails public not just because I don’t want to see her on CNN, but because with rumors afoot of her aspirations to be DNC Chair if Obama becomes the nominee, I think it’s important that Democrats see what they would be in for. While I appreciate her willingness to correspond with me, what you can see in these excerpts is an individual who doesn’t have the political savvy to communicate with the public (keep in mind I was an anonymous stranger when she wrote to me) in an appropriate and pro-Party fashion. You can see that she has no problem creating inferences that Hillary Clinton is a racist. You can see that she feels she has no responsibility to stand up against sexism. And you can see most shockingly that she resents Democrats for leaving her out in the cold since managing Al Gore’s losing 2000 campaign, finding the highest praise not for those in the Party she aspires to lead, but for Republicans. Without further ado, here are some choice excerpts from our exchange. (view emails in their entirety here). Draw your own conclusions.

Me: I am very disappointed in you. I saw you at the State of the Black Union, and not once did you speak out against a number of sexist and divisive comments about Hillary. I understand the desire to see an African American President. I share that desire. I just don't find Senator Obama, with his limited resume, and few public accomplishments (i.e. accomplishments for the people, not personal accomplishments like book writing) to have the resume for President, at this point. I think Hillary is correct to point to her strong resume, and that isn't racist.

Donna Brazile(DB): I am very sorry that you tuned into my life just three weeks ago and not the 40 years I have engaged politics on a very personal level. Just be up to date in your criticism and go back and read my columns, see my interviews and then walk a moment in the shoes of someone who calls it like it is.

ME: I'm young, but I have been watching you for eight years. You can not possibly think I just tuned in three weeks ago. That's why I expect more from you. You are one of the most prominent female voices of the Democratic Party. Emotions are running high, and the media is just loving to play up the fissures in the Party.

DB: Please don't lecture me about the isms in America . You cannot blame the media for Clinton being behind or running out of money. It's the strategy stupid... And I for one have gotten down right tired of the lame excuses. When many of us beat the heck out of Obama last year, we were not called racists.

ME: I don't expect you to watch the sexism. I was hoping for a more fair reading from you. I think it's loopy to think Hillary has run a racist campaign. Really loopy. Again, the 3am ad, winning NH??? These are not signs of racism. If you respect a candidate, you run against them on the merits, which Hillary has done.

DB: Just ask Hillary why is she apologizing to Black folks at every turn. And now Obama has to denounce his pastor.

ME: She doesn't have to. She just is because she doesn't want anyone to feel alienated or offended. I can not believe that's what you really see. How sad.

DB: I defended the Clintons and it was Black people who kept their asses in office. Now, show respect and not indifference or worse insularity and more insults. I am not checking my black or feminist credentials into the locker box for either candidate.

ME: Let's agree on some things. I have never walked a mile in your shoes. I am outraged by the continued institutional racism in our justice system, in our educational system, in our society. We are not at odds here. As far as McCain goes, I dislike him, and his extremist supporters. I do think that if you believe Hillary Clinton is a racist or has employed a racist campaign strategy, you are overreaching to the extreme.

DB: She’s the one apologizing to Black folks. Not me. Not You. She is the one saying I regret. Not me. Not you.

ME: Yes, because she doesn't want any one to be offended. She's a buck stops here person. I think that's an admirable quality.

DB: Blacks have been deeply wounded by the duplicity of the Clintons . Now, you may not like it or agree. But as a black person who helped saved the Clinton presidency, please just respect what I am saying. [emphasis added] Again, you disagree. But, I honestly believe the wounds will not heal. It’s personal and the Clintons have shown their darker demons. [emphasis added] Now, I will end it here. I was Al Gore’s Campaign Manager. Let the buck stop here. If I make a decision to go with Obama, people read it as Al Gore hates the Clintons. So, I stay above the bull and do not take bull from the Clintons or the Obamas or the McCains. I don’t owe anybody a dime. And if I counted who has helped me since 2000, it's Republican men and not Democrats.

Go figure and good night.

--------------------------end of quote.

The above email interview comes from a posting on Taylor Marsh's Website. It seems to me that what happened was, Donna Brazille ran a losing campaign for Al Gore and was somewhat shunned by her fellow democrats. Apparently some republicans were more supportive than the democrats.

What Brazille doesn't get is that Bill Clinton has been the only two term Democrat since World War II. It would seem to me that the winning democratic family of the 90's should have more influence than a presidential adviser / loser of the 2000 presidential race who shunned the Clinton's support.

MSNBC Afraid to Fire Keith Olbermann?

It just dawned on me that as annoying as Keith Olbermann has become, the idea of paying the guy to do nothing must really irk MSNBC moreso than firing him. It's too bad MSNBC didn't just remain neutral in this years democratic race.

If MSNBC had remained neutral in this years democratic race, Hillary Clinton would have won an incredibly close contest. Barack Obama would be a rising star within the democratic party with the potential of being a 2 term VP and then a 2 term President. The just completed Denver Convention could have been a combo love in of epic proportions and a tribute to the 90's as well, and an incredible ratings success.



I think MSNBC might be realizing all that they have lost by influencing the democratic nomination process. The ability of Olbermann to counteract the right has been lost amidst ridiculously amped up umbarging against the Clinton camp throughout the campaign. Even Olbermann's taunts against Bill O'Reilly fall flat as whenever I tune into O'Reilly (and I never used to until Keith started reminding me to), O'Reilly is calm, cool, and collected, something Olbermann hasn't been in months.

Olbermann Imploding

Just How Daft and Idiotic has the Democratic Party become?

Hillary and Bill Clinton were put on display at the democratic convention on Tuesday and Wednesday. Forced into faux smiles on by a democratic party that demanded "unity or impunity".

I had no idea how evil the higher ups of the D.N.C. have become. If any group ever needed an enema, it is the head of the D.N.C.

In the meantime, lets remember what this is about. It's about slapping a political family in the face that had the best democratic record in the past 50 years in terms of longevity and success. Rather than pursuing delegates hidden away like an easter egg hunt in caucus land, the Hillary Clinton candidacy is about reaching out to the MOST people in the country, but apparently the concept of reaching the most people has been "changed" into one of reaching the "most important" people, aka the caucus delegates.

The most successful democratic family of the past 50 years stood patiently by and let two other democratic candidates have their chance at winning the white house in 2000 and 2004. Only when Hillary Clinton had gained additional senatorial experience to go along with her two decades of being part of Bill Clinton's legacy did Hillary Clinton attempt her run for president.

The D.N.C. instead sent the message to 17 million loyal democrats that once a politician steps out of power, they become a footnote and meaningless, even when they played team politics before they attempted their run for the nomination. I'm not sure this type of change will fly with Clinton Democrats, nor should it.

My Response to Politico.com and their "Whiny Babies" Slam Headline against Hillary Clinton.

Quote from (Roger Simon) article...

"The Clinton campaign had nobody on the payroll to call superdelegates in March 2007. People didn't know about superdelegates, a high-ranking Clinton staff member said. Nobody figured it out. They thought it was all about winning states and not delegates."

If Barack Obama was doing such a better job at calling and getting super delegates, how come Hillary Clinton had over a one hundred super delegate lead at the beginning of the race? How can we trust your journalistic intelligence in deciding what quotes to use and therefore validate, and what quotes not to use, when you use questionable quotes in your articles?

Just because a "staffer" says it, doesn't make it an accurate statement, but you quote and cite statistically inaccurate comments about super delegates as fact. There is also no mention made of "donations" made to some of these super delegates (and pledged delegates) by the Barack Obama camp, especially the ones that changed their vote to Barack Obama even though Hillary Clinton won their congressional district or state.

Quote from the article...

We were the earliest to staff up and open offices there, and the first six states we staffed were caucus states. That was a strategic decision. The Obama campaign liked caucus states, which place a high value on organization."

This is another amazingly misleading quote. We can interpret the above quote to mean, "Why try and earn more votes from the masses when we can get a better overall deal from the caucuses and the much lower voter turnout? For you to complement this caucus strategy as being "superior" to Hillary Clinton's method of going for the most overall voters is why there is a disconnect between Barack Obama and 30% of the Clinton voters.

The Barack Obama camp placed high value on the caucus states because the risk reward was in their favor. Caucuses produce lower voter turnout percentages that are as much as 88% lower than the primaries. Translation, it is easier to win a disproportionate amount of delegates in the caucus states than it is in the primaries because of the volatility of lower numbers of voters.

Did you consider that some people aren't impressed by "Amazing Race" and "Survivor" style of politicking? Guess what, some of us actually like and respect a candidate that wants to win as many votes as possible while staying on message, aka Hillary Clinton.

Quote from the article...

"The Obama campaign, it should be pointed out, did not actually foresee the future; it merely prepared for it."

When Hillary Clinton was leading in the super delegate race by over a hundred delegates, Dan Abrams of MSNBC floated out the idea that super delegates shouldn't decide the race. So on the one hand, Barack Obama's camp did not forsee the future, yet the media still made the case that it would be unfair if Hillary Clinton won the race via the super delegate vote, she could not win via Florida and Michigan because she agreed not to count them, and you seem intent on saying Clinton blew it in the caucus states and that 1.1 million voters supercede the results of over 35 million voters. Hillary Clinton actually won MORE pledged delegates from all the primary states, even when Florida and Michigan are not counted! Claiming that Hillary Clinton ran a poor race is silly when she actually won more pledged delegates than Barack Obama did from the primary states (even when Florida and Michigan are not counted).

Someone at Politico.com chose to come up with the "Whiny Babies" headline. which camouflages what your article is about. Your article makes a case for winning the democratic battle even if it weakens the case for winning the Presidential war. It is YOUR OPINION that winning the democratic battle even if it weakens the chances of winning the presidential war is a superior campaign plan. 30% of Hillary Clinton supporters wholeheartedly disagree that winning the battle matters more than winning the war.

Ever heard of "Fair Reflection"?

Don't be surprised if Barack Obama wins the democratic battle but loses the presidential war...and don't blame Hillary Clinton supporters if Barack Obama loses this fall when all Hillary Clinton supporters wanted to win was the candidate that ran a more straight forward campaign, something that you seem to think of as being old school.

Barack Obama's side has been clever, and they may have even crossed the line legality in the caucus states. Being clever at the expense of 18 million voters makes me wonder just how clever Barack Obama really was.

Quote from the article...

"Some caucus states were outside of Hillary’s political orbit. They were in the West, the Great Plains, the Rocky Mountains. Hillary’s strength tended to be more East Coast and West Coast.”

I can't even fathom how to respond to such an absurd comment. Hillary Clinton won contiguous states that touch each other all the way across the country from the South Western coast (California) all the way to the North Eastern coast (New York) including virtually ALL the swing states, plus Florida, Michigan and South Dakota. Barack Obama did not win contiguous states that span across the entire country, lol, because Hillary Clinton DID! Look at the map below.


"Some caucus states were outside of Hillary’s political orbit. They were in the West, the Great Plains, the Rocky Mountains. Hillary’s strength tended to be more East Coast and West Coast.”

Notice how Mr. Simon changes the topic from the real issue, which is that older folks have more built in responsibilities and some physical limitation and as a result can't travel as far or at a specific time of day, especially in the MIDDLE OF WINTER.

As you can see from the map, Hillary's popularity spanned across the entire country, not just east and west, as Mr. Simon implies. All of those great plains and Rocky Mountain caucus "victories" for Barack Obama had polls taken just prior to their caucuses and Hillary Clinton was either tied or leading against Barack Obama. Fair Reflection, what is Fair Reflection?

-Alessandro Machi

Twenty FACTS that PROVE Hillary Clinton should be the Presumptive Democratic Nominee, not Barack Obama.

20 FACTS that support (PROVE) Hillary Clinton should be the presumptive nominee.

FACT: Hillary Clinton won 7 of the 8 biggest states, and 8 out the 10 biggest states. in the country.

FACT: Hillary Clinton won 40 more pledged delegates than Barack Obama among all the primary contests even when Florida and Michigan are not counted..

FACT: Hillary Clinton was leading or tied in MOST of the caucus contests polls just prior to the vote, but lost to Barack Obama by a 2-1 margin in most of these caucuses.

FACT: Three Caucus contests that Barack Obama won by at least a 2-1 margin also held primaries at a later date and ALL showed a GAIN for Hillary Clinton of over 33% versus Barack Obama, thereby making the case for caucus cheating, or at the very least, lack of "Fair Reflection" in the caucus contests.

FACT:Texas is another example in which Hillary Clinton WON the popular vote, and then ONCE AGAIN lost the "two step" and "three step" caucuses BY A TWO to ONE margin!

FACT: During Election Night coverage, MSNBC REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE on air that Hillary Clinton closed to within 2% in the Nebraska Primary after previously losing the Nebraska caucus by a laughably false margin of 37%. When the election night Nebraska Primary results graphic was temporarily up on the screen, Chris Matthews and company IGNORED IT EVERY TIME. The final time the Nebraska graphic was put on the screen, Matthews demanded the Nebraska graphic be taken down and replaced with the West Virginia result from that same night. Instead of talking about two momentum shifting Hillary Clinton successes in one night, MSNBC completely ignored talking about the Nebraska primary result and instead just focused on West Virginia and its "racist, lower income, uneducated base that favored Hillary Clinton".

FACT:Barack Obama picked up many of his super delegates during the time period when he was losing the popular vote and delegate count to Hillary Clinton 53% to 47%.

FACT:Hillary Clinton actually lost super delegates to Barack Obama even as she was winning the final 2 and 1/2 months of the contest both in popular vote and in pledged delegates.

FACT: Hillary Clinton won the Electoral College Map versus Barack Obama by over a hundred votes.

FACT: Hillary Clinton was routinely cheated out of Delegates, at one point beating Barack Obama in 11 out of 12 States but only gaining 5 more overall delegates than Barack Obama. (see image below)


FACT: Howard Dean and John Kerry were financed by Billionaire George Soros in 2004, Bob Richardson and John Edwards were supported by Billionaire George Soros in 2008, Soros has been working behind the scenes to ensure that Barack Obama be declared the democratic nominee irrespective of whether or not he actually won it fairly and squarely.

FACT: Nancy Pelosi was recently outed as giving five figure donations to delegates so they would switch their vote from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama, even in states where Hillary Clinton had won the popular vote.

FACT: George Soros funded Arianna Huffington and Huffington Post, whose pundits would appear on MSNBC and CNN, plus Time and Newsweek, and tear down Hillary Clinton on a daily basis during the campaign season.

FACT: Media headlines demanded that Hillary Clinton suspend her campaign as far back as February, 2008. These headlines continued on a weekly basis until Hillary Clinton finally realized her political career would be ruined if she allowed the media harrassment to continue. To end the political harrassment, Hillary Clinton suspended her campaign. The media immediately proclaimed that Hillary Clinton had voluntarily suspended her campaign.

FACT: Never before has the media demanded that a candidate suspend a presidential campaign prior to the convention, until Hillary Clinton was the candidate.

FACT: Never before has a presidential candidate been pressured to release her delegates prior to a vote at the convention, until Hillary Clinton was the candidate.

FACT:Never before has the media called a presumptive nominee, in a race to close to call, the official nominee before the convention. I believe the networks have left themselves open for a huge lawsuit in this matter.

FACT: Barack Obama has less senatorial, governing, or security experience than any president in the past 120 years.

FACT: hundreds of delegates and super delegates changed their vote to Barack Obama after being for Hillary Clinton because they assumed they were supposed to vote for who might win, not who they wanted to win, because of media pressure.

FACT: Over a hundred Super Delegates and pledged delegates have switched their vote to Barack Obama even thought they thought Hillary Clinton was the better candidate and more likely to win in November against John McCain. (go ahead, ask them who they think is the better candidate)

FACT: A significant number of delegates and super delegates changed their vote to Barack Obama after receiving a "donation" from Barack Obama, even when their congressional district had voted for Hillary Clinton.

FACT: The number one comment about Keith Olbermann that I hear is either, "I used to like that guy", or "I can't believe I used to like that guy". (before Olbermann singlehandily verbally assaulted Clinton on so many occasions we all lost count, and stopped watching). Keith Olbermann looked right into the camera and lied one night when talking about "never having clamored to have Hillary Clinton quit the race".

HILLARY CLINTON EARNED the 2008 Democratic NOMINATION, that is all I can go by.

PUMA is just stage one. Stage TWO is, HILLARY CLINTON EARNED THE 2008 DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION. Barack Obama's trip to Europe is and probably will remain the biggest embarrassment of the 2008 presidential campaign.

Barack Obama's European trip, in which he strolled out onto stage in Germany and actually believed he was already president of the United States and further believed he had somehow earned the privilege of standing in front of so many people, is a gaffe only surpassed by his rushing by and ignoring soldiers standing at attention without taking a moment to speak to them or acknowledge them, all this happened on the same trip!


Hillary Clinton won 40 more congressional districts than Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton HANDILY won all the swing states. Barack Obama received INFLATED delegate totals from the Caucus States. Hillary Clinton received DEFLATED delegate counts from her swing state wins, netting only five more delegates than Barack Obama 555 to 550, even though Hillary Clinton won 11 out of 12 swing state and Barack Obama LOST those same 11 out of 12 swing state contests!


Media Bias orchestrated by George Soros, Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, Time and Newsweek had a hand in Barack Obama having a false delegate lead. Internal Political Bias by Howard Dean, who was backed by George Soros in 2004, and John Kerry, also backed by George Soros in 2004, show a bought Democratic party that must either CHANGE and do the right thing, or this slap in the face against long time democrats cannot be forgotten.

FAIR WARNING to Republicans about the Whitey Tape, RELEASE it BEFORE the Denver Convention if it EXISTS, or LOSE HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTERS!

What I have heard is that the Whitey tape does exist and that the Republicans are waiting until October to release it.

If this is true, this is very disturbing to me. This would mean that the Republicans, rather than win the election by facing the strongest democratic candidate, chose to be sexist, ageist, AND racist by waiting until it was too late for Hillary Clinton to be reconsidered for the nomination before releasing the whitey tape.

I believe the Whitey Tape, assuming it exists and is released in October as planned, could backfire on the Republicans. I actually might reconsider and vote for Barack Obama if the Republicans wait to release a tape that would have helped Hillary Clinton if it had been released earlier.

Otherwise, I am rewarding the Republican party for helping to ruin Hillary Clinton's chance at this year's nomination by witholding important information until it could no longer help her this year.

FAIR WARNING TO REPUBLICANS, IF YOU HAVE A WHITEY TAPE, RELEASE IT BEFORE THE AUGUST DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION, or you may LOSE MY VOTE.

lol, Ralph Nader is looking better and better if Hillary does not get the nomination in Denver and the Republicans hold onto a whitey tape until October.

Irreparable Harm from the Germany Visit for Barack Obama, Lets Nominate Hillary Clinton.

I am having difficulty comprehending why it was important for Barack Obama to speak in front of a large audience in a foreign country. What was Barack thinking when he calmly walked up to the mike, looked out at the audience, and tried to wow them.

When one factors in that Barack Obama walked by soldiers in formation and ignored them, skipped meetings with wounded soldiers. and spent untold millions for this over the top photo shoot, there is no way I could ever bring myself to vote for him. I sincerely hope there is a Do Over in Denver and Hillary Clinton gets the nomination.

GEORGE SOROS vs HILLARY CLINTON, Lets not put links to George Soros Related Websites.

Media matters is actually an interesting think tank. However it is backed by George Soros, and that is a BIG Problem.

I think it is important to expose the evil George Soros on my various blogs because the majority of people backing Hillary Clinton know little about him. George Soros is the axis of evil that destroyed Hillary Clinton. George Soros, Move-ON.org, Media Matters, Arianna Huffington and Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, Newseek, and Time magazine.

It is very easy to connect the dots. Arianna Huffington oversaw George Soros Shadow government convention back in 2004. Huffington and Soros have appeared on the same Charlie Rose television show, each promoting their own book. Soros probably bought an hour episode of the Rose Show and gave half of the time to Arianna Huffington. I recall reading that Soros was an initital funder of the Huffington Post, and this is where it gets really really ugly.

Huffington Post supplies both CNN and MSNBC with media Pundits who have drank from the George Soros Kool Aid. CNN, MSNBC, Time and Newsweek all share each others hosts and pundits. They are all on the same team. I have documented in this very blog Jonathan Alter, a senior higher up at Newsweek, and Keith Olbermann conducting a 4 minute barrage against John McCain when all McCain had done was very eloquently point out how Hillary Clinton had been treated horribly by the media. Jonathan Alter link.

Lets Be Careful about linking to George Soros backed blogs or websites.

Hillary Clinton Blog Owners, Free Hillary Clinton Protest Postcards now available.

If you are a Hillary Clinton Blogger, you can receive 14 free Hillary Clinton Protest postcards. Once you receive your postcards just mention it on your blog, but you don't have to.

Just send me a link to your website and an address where you want your cards sent to, to info@shareamillion.com

Coming Soon, Making a case to Deny the US media outlets from intermingling, just the way gang members are treated.

I recall from time to time how injunctions are meted out against gang members so they cannot meet in public. In general, the ACLU is against such rulings, but then the crime drops in that area, and it probably is a good thing the judge mandated the gang members not meet up. It probably even gives the gang members a chance to develop their own identity without having to worry what other members in the gang may think.

I have been wondering if the same ruling could be applied to the insidiously gang like behavior of MSNBC, Huffington Post, CNN, Newsweek, Time, MoveOn.org and the mother ship, George Soros. These factions have aligned in such a way as to validate each other on a day to day basis.

MSNBC and CNN constantly have Huffington Post "pundits" on their shows. Newsweek and MSNBC not only share website links, they also share each others pundits, cross pollinating punditry. CNN and Time do the same thing with their guests. Huffington posts welcomes viewpoints from anyone who might help them reach their pre-ordained agenda of getting Barack Obama elected, and more importantly, Huffington Post is the feeder to many news channels. Huffington Post appears to be funded by George Soros.

I would suggest that these news organizations be barred from mingling with each other on television. Just as gang members hanging out on street corners can sometimes be bad for their neighborhood in general, the same ruling could be applied to media interests that hang out together while purporting to be reporting the news, rather than manipulating the news and reinforcing their version by using each other's pundits.

From the LA TImes Political Blog, "Crowd Erupts during Barack Obama Speech, but it's over the mention of Clinton."

Crowd Erupts during Barack Obama Speech, but it's over the mention of Hillary Clinton.



Apparently, while Barack Obama was speaking at a La Raza Rally in San Diego, he happened to mention Hillary Clinton. The crowd cheered loudest at the mention of Hillary Clinton's name.

From what I have heard, La Raza tends to be viewed as an extremist radical group bent on retaking California on behalf of Mexico. If I recall correctly, La Raza advocates Mexican citizens populating California by any means available. Eventually Mexican citizens become the largest ethnicity in California by a landslide and in essence, La Raza's mission of bringing California back to Mexico will be accomplished.

I guess "if you can't beat them, overpopulate them" is the new war cry.

Compared to Bush's war, probably a much smarter way to go, assuming one believes that war, either by military might or rapidly populating an area, is the best way to accomplish change.

Hillary Clinton Protest Postcards are now Online!

You can order Hillary Clinton Protest Postcards at AlexLOGIC on Amazon dot com



I believe if thousands upon thousands of these postcards end up at various locations such as the DNC, it can make a difference.



The postcards are professionally produced and come with tiered discount pricing.



Other places to mail the postcards to include delegates, superdelegates, politicians, radio, television, and newspaper pundits.



Hillary Clinton Protest Postcards can be ordered at AlexLOGIC on Amazon dot com



Please DO NOT order these postcards if you are John McCain or Barack Obama supporters or do not plan on resending out the postcards after you receive them.

Even Jay Leno Tries to Joke Away the MSNBC conspiracy Against Hillary Clinton.

Jay Leno tells a "joke" about how the Hillary Clinton side claims she was forced to suspend the race prematurely. Interestingly enough there was one or two men that seemed to laugh extraordinarily loud in the audience to help keep the laughter going.

Although I guess I can understand NBC's desire to pretend that MSNBC doesn't exist, the joke isn't funny.

"Men" who Enjoy Attacking Hillary Clinton and then Gloating About it, add Dick Morris to the List.

The concept of attacking those who helped boost your own career has been taken to a new extreme by Dick Morris, who seems to enjoy gloating about his attacks against the Clintons as well. When men publicly gloat over their public attacks against a woman, they seem to do it fearlessly.



It has always struck me as cowardly to attack someone more menacingly if you don't fear a physical confrontation from them. Dick Morris gleefully gloated over how Hillary Clinton was attacked by the Republicans at the 1992 Republican convention and therefore Bill Clinton was left unscathed.

The glee Morris showed on the Bill O'Reilly show just comes off as another man who needs to show his bravado against those who probably won't physically kick his butt. (notice I said probably). In my opinion, Dick Morris is a coward.

Huffington Post Continues to Mock the Clintons.

You guys at Huffington Post really should read my blog from time to time as your arrogance seems to have no limits. The fact that you don't just shows the level of arrogance and elitism you are capable of.

This is why we fight on. The blubbards who helped temporarilly topple Hillary Clinton MUST BE SPOTLIGHTED so normal, intelligent people can see how their power must be reduced.

The normal, non elitist people can refer to my "Huffington Post Attacks Hillary Clinton Expose" Huffington Post Exposed on Hillary-Wins Blog.

Even after exposing the condescending elitism Huffington Post spews against the Clintons on a regular basis you can see that Huffington Post STILL does the same thing (unflattering picture cropping of the Clintons).

There They Go Again, Vanity Fair Assuming the Unassumable about the Caucus State Results.

Vanity Fair Article on Hillary Clinton

I'm just going to point out how another "in depth" article once again fails to question the validity of the caucus state voting and instead just calls it a "stunning 11 victories in a row for Barack Obama". It's just nonsense. Why did Edwards get out just before all of these caucuses when he had a chance to get some decent delegate counts? Where did all of the Edwards caucus support go since he had dropped out of the race just before all of these races?

The answer my friend, is blowing in the wind. It's called collusion, sexism, and ageism, and Barack Obama, Bob Richardson, and Edwards should be ashamed for being a part of it.

Huffington Post Prints Another "Hillary Unfairly Attacked" Piece, HP's "Hypocrisy against Hillary Clinton is off the Charts".

Sigh. Huffington Post is at it again. Now that Hillary Clinton is supposed to support Barack Obama, Huffington Post runs a sympathetic piece about how Dick Morris has repeatedly attacked the Clintons.

Click on image to Enlarge.

The hypocrisy of Huffington Post printing "Hillary unfairly attacked" pieces when Huffington Post was the number one Hillary Clinton internet attacker over the past 6 months is galling, and something that needs to be pointed out.

Any news media outlet that would so freely and easily change from attack mode to empathy mode cannot be trusted as they have their own agenda in place that has very little to do with reporting the actual news.

It's as if George Soros, Huffington Post, and their allies think we are so stupid that we won't notice their attempts to first trash Hillary Clinton, and then simply "Move on" to a new chapter in which they all admit that it was "somebody else" unfairly trashing Hillary Clinton, "AND IT WAS WRONG!"

Huffington Post and friends now casting sympathy towards Hillary Clinton after relentlessly trashing Clinton's reputation reminds me of OJ Simpson vowing to find the people who murdered his wife.

Click on Image to Enlarge.

About six weeks ago it was Jill Iscol writing on Huffington Post about how Hillary Clinton had been unfairly attacked by....everybody else EXCEPT the Huffington Post!

The above are just two examples that try and cover the bloodshed Huffington Post had already inflicted on Hillary Clinton and her campaign. Additional articles bemoaning Hillary Clinton's unfair treatment have appeared on Huffington Post since Hillary Clinton suspended her campaign.

No matter how many articles Huffington Post writes about how unfairy Hillary Clinton was treated during the 2008 democratic campaign, Huffington Post CANNOT take away their own treacherous treatment of Hillary Clinton during that same time period.

Click on Image to Enlarge.

Alleged Hillary Clinton supporter Hilary Rosen is now an editor at Huffington Post and wrote the above article!

"Follow me all you sheep, follow me over to Obama," seems to be the unwritten message behind Hilary Rosen joining Huffington Post. From head to toe, the whole Barack Obama organization seems to rely on "changing" their point of view as new situations arise. Huffington Post falls into this pattern of behavior as well.

"Changing the type of change when necessary for victory," is how I describe Huffington Post's agenda.

It is my opinion that Huffington Post ran dozens upon dozens of anti Hillary Clinton news stories during the 2008 democratic race and below are several examples.

Click on Image to Enlarge

Notice the actual framing of the picture that is used for the image of Hillary Clinton. The intent is to show Hillary Clinton as being angry and unlikeable. The reality is politicians go through 30 facial expressions EVERY SECOND, so finding a frame to make the person look less likeable is rather easy to do AND is manipulation of the news by those who claim to be the messenger, not the creator of news.

The two narrow pictures below the main picture have been framed to show Clinton and Carville looking evil and menacing. Framing politicians just above the eyes and just below the lips is about the most uncomplementary frame one can choose, but on Huffington Post, it's a way of life.

When I select images for my blog articles, I NEVER intentionally pick a frame that makes somebody look bad. The picture needs to be either of the EXACT or near moment someone says something that is being quoted, or something from around that time period, if possible, without trying to imply that the picture proves the point of the article.

My own "Fair Reflection article" about the Florida delegates article did have images of a confused Robert Wexler, because Wexler was in fact clueless as to what Fair Reflection meant!

At Huffington Post, uncomplementary poses and framing of images of Hillary Clinton were frequently used to promote their anti Hillary Clinton agenda during the 2008 democratic presidential campaign.

Observe the way Huffington Post framed and cropped shots of Hillary Clinton below to make her look unpresidential.

I would probably have well over a hundred or more Huffington Post "anti Hillary Clinton" headlines to choose from if I had started from January of this year and gone through to the end of the democratic primary contests.

Notice the unfriendly cropping on the four headline photos above. Each picture of Hillary Clinton is cropped to make Hillary Clinton look subliminally "wrong" or "not like one of us". Documentaries and news interviews will frame or crop the image around the eyes, or cut off the top and bottom of the face when they want to make someone look unfriendly, untrustworthy, shifty eyed, or angry.

Below are several more photo examples of Huffington Post claiming that momentum is no longer on Hillary Clinton's side. Loss of momentum was actually a major, major part of the assault on Hillary Clinton by Huffington Post and MSNBC, and it started with charges of racism against the Clintons in both Nevada and South Carolina and continued onward with the fraudulent caucus contests back in early February 2008.

 

As you can see up above, for every Huffington Post anti Hillary Clinton headline, there was also a positive Barack Obama headline as well. Huffington Post always depicted Barack Obama as the more popular candidate.

Huffington Post always projected Barack Obama's popularity as always cresting and surging while Hillary Clinton's popularity was always sinking.

As you can see above, creating tomorrows news yesterday with slanted headlines that either supported Barack Obama or tore at Hillary Clinton's popularity was something Huffinton Post was willing to do on a very regular basis.

 

Just "accept it" is how the George Soros led media machine was able to put Barack Obama on top and keep him there.....for now.

The two headlines above imply that Hillary Clinton might be a bit unstable.

Above Hillary Clinton is called "the worst person in the world" in the above Huffington Post headline.

Below Huffington Post comes up with a "clever twist" to an expected blow out loss for Barack Obama In West Virginia.

Above (click on the image to see it bigger) Huffington Post actually predicts an OVER EXAGGERATED margin of victory in West Virgina for Hillary Clinton, calling it 80%-20% in favor of Hillary Clinton, then when the actual vote totals come in lower than 80% for Hillary Clinton, Huffington Post accuses Clinton of losing her "racist base" (see headline below).

According to Huffington Post, even when Hillary wins by a HUGE landslide in West Virginia, Hillary Clinton is actually accused of losing her "racist base".

Lets not forget the announcement of John Edwards supporting Barack Obama right after the huge West Virginia victory for Hillary Clinton. This non story was hyped by Huffington Post and immediately supplanted Hillary's blow out win in West Virginia as their headline news story.

Even when Hillary wins by a 41% margin, Barack Obama's introduction of John Edwards at a Barack Obama LOSING RALLY becomes the bigger news story on Huffington Post.

Then chatterbox Huffington Post "Pundits" such as Rachel Maddow and others appear on MSNBC and blather on and on how the Edwards coming out party for Barack Obama is somehow a bigger story than Hillary Clinton winning by a 40% margin in West Virginia.

The interjection of Reality TV excitement into actual news events is a disturbing trend. John Edward's endorsement CANNOT be bigger than the votes of hundreds of thousands of people in an election, especially when it is a landslide victory and is helping to propel Hillary Clinton to win more delegates than Barack Obama over the final two and a half months of the democratic primary contests.

I guess when Howard Dean said whomever does better over the final 2 and 1/2 months of the campaign would win the nomination only counts if it is Barack Obama who was doing better. Hillary Clinton actually did signifcantly better than Barack Obama over the final 10 weeks of the democratic contests yet delegates left her???

Does that make any sense to you?

This was the image on Huffington Post that blotted out Hillary Clinton's West Virginia win. John Edwards smiling at Barack Obama is somehow deemed more newsworthy than Hillary Clinton's crushing victory in West Virginia.

Hillary Clinton is heading towards a projected 54-55% of the popular vote total over the final 8-10 democratic contests and Huffington Post wants everybody to believe that John Edwards walking onto a stage to greet Barack Obama is a bigger story.

Can it get anymore insulting than that? Actually yes, as MSNBC and CNN went with the same theme as well.

The headline above was refuted by SEVERAL pundits as being an over exaggeration and in turn pundits condemned how several George Soros friendly media such as Huffington Post and MSNBC were trying to keep the quote alive and use it as a reason for Hillary Clinton to quit.

SEVERAL news outlets denounced the story as much ado about nothing.

The headline below is from 2006 and clearly shows that Huffington Post had already decided two years ago that Hillary Clinton could not be the nominee.

A purported internet news source such as Huffington Post pretending to be an unbiased news site when it has a predisposed agenda is a form of fraud, no? Shouldn't there be an investigation?

Is it really acceptable for Huffington Post to parade as an "internet newspaper" while all along Huffington Post has a built in agenda to hype one democratic candidate defeat another?

Newsweek comes to the aid of George Soros, Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, MOVE ON, Media Matters, and Daily Kos attack squad, with an article that claims it is impossible to cheat in an election.

Of course Newsweek never mentions the caucus cheating that went on in which one million voters were able to over ride the will of 35 million voters, and Newsweek never mentions what "Fair-Reflection" means to the democratic party. www.FAIR-REFLECTION.blogspot.com

Oh wait, maybe I was wrong. (sarcasm alert) Maybe Huffington Post did put a very nice picture of Hillary Clinton on their website.........

.......After Hillary Clinton was forced to drink the Obama Kool Aid or risk further wrath and damage from Huffington Post and MSNBC's ongoing assault for not quitting the race sooner.

Below is me getting banned from Huffington Post after my articles on the George Soros / Arianna Huffington hook up appeared on my blogs.

Don't be alarmed, you're not banned, that was me getting banned from Huffington Post. That was the message that popped up on my Huffington Post account after my George Soros / Arianna Huffington "have hooked up" articles appeared on my blogs.

The banning by Huffington Post just gives me more time for my own blogs.

Works for me.

(Edit update - Dec. 16, 2010 11:04 PM - It should be noted that is all just Huffington Post. While Huffington Post was doing their daily Hillary Clinton assault and Barack Obama is great fluff pieces, there was MSNBC assaulting Hillary Clinton almost by the hour, Time, Newsweek with their hit pieces, The Atlantic, lets not forget the FOUR HUNDRED COLUMNISTS WHO COVERTLY AGREED TO PROTECT BARACK OBAMA FROM ANY RACIST TIES while simultaneously either ignoring Hillary Clinton, or attacking her.)

I hope you in the mainstream media are all proud. Every day 10,000 Americans lose their home, and Barack Obama just keeps his poker face on, as if it has nothing to do with him.