Linking back to one of this Blogs most intense Articles about the Media Bias and Sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure in 2008.

This article took over a day to put together, plus work over a couple of months collecting various headlines not knowing they would one day be used to create this article.

This one is from Hillary Clinton Forum.net

Linking back to one of this Blogs most intense Articles about the the Media Bias and Sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure in 2008.

This article took over a day to put together, plus work over a couple of months collecting various headlines not knowing they would one day be used to create this article.

This one is from Hillary Clinton Forum.net

How Oprah Winfrey and George Soros have influence peddled this year while conservatives such as Dr. Laura stay on the sidelines.

What I have found most offensive about this years presidential race has been the interfering by rich or powerful celebrities during the democratic nominating process. George Soros and Oprah Winfrey have added their influence to this year's democratic race and in the process may have harmed the sovereignty of future presidential races.

I believe up until this year there has been an unstated "gentleman's agreement" that the real influential power would hold back some of their power until after our two main political parties had their millions of voters vote for their favorite candidate. An example of this type of situation would be John McCain only having 1% of the vote less than one year ago, yet coming back to win the Republican nomination.

However, on the democratic side, the democrats seemed to have ripped up the playbook and did everything in their power to help Barack Obama win at all costs. This Barack must win strategy has created a new problem. Why should either political side wait for 30 million voters to help decide who is the nominee when overzealous help early on by the rich and powerful can pretty much lock up the nomination before the voters get to vote?

I believe the evidence in the 2008 presidential race shows that the conservative side basically allowed the existing candidates to legitimately battle each other, and once John McCain was elected, they rallied around him. On the democratic side, interveners like Oprah Winfrey and George Soros, rather than wait until 35 million democrats decided who would be the nominee, decided to manipulate who would actually get the democratic nomination before 35 million democratic voters voted.

This is actually a serious issue.

If Oprah Winfrey and George Soros are successful in their quest to dictate who is the democratic nominee prior to 35 million democrats voting, it will only get worse in future elections. Although I don't know how much Dr. Laura could have influenced this year's election, it is sad to see democrats such as George Soros and Oprah Winfrey lowering the bar to the point where it will no doubt contaminate the electoral process from now on, meanwhile Dr. Laura remains rather quiet and does not use her show or celebrity to manipulate voters the way Oprah Winfrey has shamelessly been doing for over a year now.

I wish for Barack Obama to lose so that the rich and powerful don't believe they are above all others when it comes to influence peddling who will be each political parties nominee.

NBC does the right thing and reposts the Saturday Night Live CSPAN Bailout with George Soros, Pelosi, Frank, Bush & Sandler Lookalikes.

(Edit update - Feb. 03, 2010 Read the Transcript of the Saturday Night Live George Soros skit by clicking here. I transcribed it myself so please link to it rather than just copying it as it took a while to do.)

I just briefly glanced the new version of the Saturday Night Live CSPAN Bailout Spoof. It appears to be slightly shorter than the prior version, about 10 seconds shorter. As I had suggested in a prior article, removing the Sandler graphic suggesting they be punished (actually it was much stronger language than that and I don't want to repeat it) was really all that needed to be done, and it appears that is what was done! I think some edits may have been tightened up to make the pacing go faster.

I just read elsewhere that one short exchange between the Sandlers and "Barney Frank" was taken out. I'm ok with that as well. The whole piece still works.

The Soros piece seems to have been left intact. I don't consider it censorship since the Sandler section simply had a somewhat dangerous graphic overlay removed. In the Soros section the superimposed graphics were very powerful and possibly true and it appears they have been left intact.

NBC does the right thing and reposts the Saturday Night Live CSPAN Bailout with George Soros, Pelosi, Frank, Bush & Sandler Lookalikes.

(Edit update - Feb. 03, 2010 Read the Transcript of the Saturday Night Live George Soros skit by clicking here. I transcribed it myself so please link to it rather than just copying it as it took a while to do.)

I just briefly glanced the new version of the Saturday Night Live CSPAN Bailout Spoof. It appears to be slightly shorter than the prior version, about 10 seconds shorter. As I had suggested in a prior article, removing the Sandler graphic suggesting they be punished (actually it was much stronger language than that and I don't want to repeat it) was really all that needed to be done, and it appears that is what was done! I think some edits may have been tightened up to make the pacing go faster.

I just read elsewhere that one short exchange between the Sandlers and "Barney Frank" was taken out. I'm ok with that as well. The whole piece still works.



The Soros piece seems to have been left intact. I don't consider it censorship since the Sandler section simply had a somewhat dangerous graphic overlay removed. In the Soros section the superimposed graphics were very powerful and possibly true and it appears they have been left intact.

NBC BANS Saturday Night Live CSPAN Spoof featuring George Soros lookalike and friends, Link to video can be found here.

(Edit update - Feb. 03, 2010 Read the Transcript of the Saturday Night Live George Soros skit by clicking here. I transcribed it myself so please link to it rather than just copying it as it took a while to do.)

Saturday Night Live Spoof starring George Soros lookalike.

The link above automatically downloads a wav file to your computer so don't click on it if you don't want it on your computer. I downloaded it with no problems.

The Saturday Night Live CSPAN Bailout spoof video clip has been removed by NBC. I consider this bait and switch. Garner great ratings from political material, then pretend it never happened. I stumbled upon a gracious entity who understands the importance of preserving political art and that is why you can download it at the link provided above. If you download the video the George Soros piece is in the final 90 seconds, however I don't think you can fast forward the video to the final 90 seconds.

This is just a video still image from the Saturday Night live CSPAN Spoof so clicking on it will not turn it into a video, NBC made sure of that.

Check out the caption in this image from the Saturday Night live CSPAN of the Bailout and George Soros. If you download the video the George Soros piece is in the final 90 seconds, however I don't think you can fast forward the video to the final 90 seconds.

George Soros outed on Saturday Night Live, too bad it's 6 months too late.

(Edit update - Feb. 03, 2010 - You can read the transcript of the video below at Wall Street Change. Please provide a link to Wall Street Change if you need to reference the transcript, it was a lot of work to transcribe.)

The image above is authentic, no additional words have been added. It's what this blog has been warning everybody about back since May, George Soros owns the democratic party and it makes me want to puke.

George Soros was outed on Saturday Night Live Last Night, even being accused of sabotaging the US dollar and owning the Democratic party, just like this blog has been reporting for the past 6 months. Saturday night live predicted a de-valuation of the American dollar this coming week, all courtesy of George Soros.

Please note the position of the video cursor in the still image that I have provided above. You can save six minutes if you move the video cursor on the Embedded video BELOW to match where the cursor is above. In other words, you are fast forwarding past the first six minutes of the skit to get to the part about George Soros.

To go directly to the Soros part of the skit, hit the play arrow and then slide the cursor over to the right until there is only about 1:36 remaining. Video has been removed by NBC after about a day, it's as if it never happened.

You can search this blog and my other blogs for back stories about George Soros, just use the search box in the top left hand corner of this blog.

GEORGE SOROS vs HILLARY CLINTON, Lets not put links to George Soros Related Websites.

Media matters is actually an interesting think tank. However it is backed by George Soros, and that is a BIG Problem.

I think it is important to expose the evil George Soros on my various blogs because the majority of people backing Hillary Clinton know little about him. George Soros is the axis of evil that destroyed Hillary Clinton. George Soros, Move-ON.org, Media Matters, Arianna Huffington and Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, Newseek, and Time magazine.

It is very easy to connect the dots. Arianna Huffington oversaw George Soros Shadow government convention back in 2004. Huffington and Soros have appeared on the same Charlie Rose television show, each promoting their own book. Soros probably bought an hour episode of the Rose Show and gave half of the time to Arianna Huffington. I recall reading that Soros was an initital funder of the Huffington Post, and this is where it gets really really ugly.

Huffington Post supplies both CNN and MSNBC with media Pundits who have drank from the George Soros Kool Aid. CNN, MSNBC, Time and Newsweek all share each others hosts and pundits. They are all on the same team. I have documented in this very blog Jonathan Alter, a senior higher up at Newsweek, and Keith Olbermann conducting a 4 minute barrage against John McCain when all McCain had done was very eloquently point out how Hillary Clinton had been treated horribly by the media. Jonathan Alter link.

Lets Be Careful about linking to George Soros backed blogs or websites.

Huffington Post Prints Another "Hillary Unfairly Attacked" Piece, HP's "Hypocrisy against Hillary Clinton is off the Charts".

Sigh. Huffington Post is at it again. Now that Hillary Clinton is supposed to support Barack Obama, Huffington Post runs a sympathetic piece about how Dick Morris has repeatedly attacked the Clintons.

Click on image to Enlarge.

The hypocrisy of Huffington Post printing "Hillary unfairly attacked" pieces when Huffington Post was the number one Hillary Clinton internet attacker over the past 6 months is galling, and something that needs to be pointed out.

Any news media outlet that would so freely and easily change from attack mode to empathy mode cannot be trusted as they have their own agenda in place that has very little to do with reporting the actual news.

It's as if George Soros, Huffington Post, and their allies think we are so stupid that we won't notice their attempts to first trash Hillary Clinton, and then simply "Move on" to a new chapter in which they all admit that it was "somebody else" unfairly trashing Hillary Clinton, "AND IT WAS WRONG!"

Huffington Post and friends now casting sympathy towards Hillary Clinton after relentlessly trashing Clinton's reputation reminds me of OJ Simpson vowing to find the people who murdered his wife.

Click on Image to Enlarge.

About six weeks ago it was Jill Iscol writing on Huffington Post about how Hillary Clinton had been unfairly attacked by....everybody else EXCEPT the Huffington Post!

The above are just two examples that try and cover the bloodshed Huffington Post had already inflicted on Hillary Clinton and her campaign. Additional articles bemoaning Hillary Clinton's unfair treatment have appeared on Huffington Post since Hillary Clinton suspended her campaign.

No matter how many articles Huffington Post writes about how unfairy Hillary Clinton was treated during the 2008 democratic campaign, Huffington Post CANNOT take away their own treacherous treatment of Hillary Clinton during that same time period.

Click on Image to Enlarge.

Alleged Hillary Clinton supporter Hilary Rosen is now an editor at Huffington Post and wrote the above article!

"Follow me all you sheep, follow me over to Obama," seems to be the unwritten message behind Hilary Rosen joining Huffington Post. From head to toe, the whole Barack Obama organization seems to rely on "changing" their point of view as new situations arise. Huffington Post falls into this pattern of behavior as well.

"Changing the type of change when necessary for victory," is how I describe Huffington Post's agenda.

It is my opinion that Huffington Post ran dozens upon dozens of anti Hillary Clinton news stories during the 2008 democratic race and below are several examples.

Click on Image to Enlarge

Notice the actual framing of the picture that is used for the image of Hillary Clinton. The intent is to show Hillary Clinton as being angry and unlikeable. The reality is politicians go through 30 facial expressions EVERY SECOND, so finding a frame to make the person look less likeable is rather easy to do AND is manipulation of the news by those who claim to be the messenger, not the creator of news.

The two narrow pictures below the main picture have been framed to show Clinton and Carville looking evil and menacing. Framing politicians just above the eyes and just below the lips is about the most uncomplementary frame one can choose, but on Huffington Post, it's a way of life.

When I select images for my blog articles, I NEVER intentionally pick a frame that makes somebody look bad. The picture needs to be either of the EXACT or near moment someone says something that is being quoted, or something from around that time period, if possible, without trying to imply that the picture proves the point of the article.

My own "Fair Reflection article" about the Florida delegates article did have images of a confused Robert Wexler, because Wexler was in fact clueless as to what Fair Reflection meant!

At Huffington Post, uncomplementary poses and framing of images of Hillary Clinton were frequently used to promote their anti Hillary Clinton agenda during the 2008 democratic presidential campaign.

Observe the way Huffington Post framed and cropped shots of Hillary Clinton below to make her look unpresidential.

I would probably have well over a hundred or more Huffington Post "anti Hillary Clinton" headlines to choose from if I had started from January of this year and gone through to the end of the democratic primary contests.

Notice the unfriendly cropping on the four headline photos above. Each picture of Hillary Clinton is cropped to make Hillary Clinton look subliminally "wrong" or "not like one of us". Documentaries and news interviews will frame or crop the image around the eyes, or cut off the top and bottom of the face when they want to make someone look unfriendly, untrustworthy, shifty eyed, or angry.

Below are several more photo examples of Huffington Post claiming that momentum is no longer on Hillary Clinton's side. Loss of momentum was actually a major, major part of the assault on Hillary Clinton by Huffington Post and MSNBC, and it started with charges of racism against the Clintons in both Nevada and South Carolina and continued onward with the fraudulent caucus contests back in early February 2008.

 

As you can see up above, for every Huffington Post anti Hillary Clinton headline, there was also a positive Barack Obama headline as well. Huffington Post always depicted Barack Obama as the more popular candidate.

Huffington Post always projected Barack Obama's popularity as always cresting and surging while Hillary Clinton's popularity was always sinking.

As you can see above, creating tomorrows news yesterday with slanted headlines that either supported Barack Obama or tore at Hillary Clinton's popularity was something Huffinton Post was willing to do on a very regular basis.

 

Just "accept it" is how the George Soros led media machine was able to put Barack Obama on top and keep him there.....for now.

The two headlines above imply that Hillary Clinton might be a bit unstable.

Above Hillary Clinton is called "the worst person in the world" in the above Huffington Post headline.

Below Huffington Post comes up with a "clever twist" to an expected blow out loss for Barack Obama In West Virginia.

Above (click on the image to see it bigger) Huffington Post actually predicts an OVER EXAGGERATED margin of victory in West Virgina for Hillary Clinton, calling it 80%-20% in favor of Hillary Clinton, then when the actual vote totals come in lower than 80% for Hillary Clinton, Huffington Post accuses Clinton of losing her "racist base" (see headline below).

According to Huffington Post, even when Hillary wins by a HUGE landslide in West Virginia, Hillary Clinton is actually accused of losing her "racist base".

Lets not forget the announcement of John Edwards supporting Barack Obama right after the huge West Virginia victory for Hillary Clinton. This non story was hyped by Huffington Post and immediately supplanted Hillary's blow out win in West Virginia as their headline news story.

Even when Hillary wins by a 41% margin, Barack Obama's introduction of John Edwards at a Barack Obama LOSING RALLY becomes the bigger news story on Huffington Post.

Then chatterbox Huffington Post "Pundits" such as Rachel Maddow and others appear on MSNBC and blather on and on how the Edwards coming out party for Barack Obama is somehow a bigger story than Hillary Clinton winning by a 40% margin in West Virginia.

The interjection of Reality TV excitement into actual news events is a disturbing trend. John Edward's endorsement CANNOT be bigger than the votes of hundreds of thousands of people in an election, especially when it is a landslide victory and is helping to propel Hillary Clinton to win more delegates than Barack Obama over the final two and a half months of the democratic primary contests.

I guess when Howard Dean said whomever does better over the final 2 and 1/2 months of the campaign would win the nomination only counts if it is Barack Obama who was doing better. Hillary Clinton actually did signifcantly better than Barack Obama over the final 10 weeks of the democratic contests yet delegates left her???

Does that make any sense to you?

This was the image on Huffington Post that blotted out Hillary Clinton's West Virginia win. John Edwards smiling at Barack Obama is somehow deemed more newsworthy than Hillary Clinton's crushing victory in West Virginia.

Hillary Clinton is heading towards a projected 54-55% of the popular vote total over the final 8-10 democratic contests and Huffington Post wants everybody to believe that John Edwards walking onto a stage to greet Barack Obama is a bigger story.

Can it get anymore insulting than that? Actually yes, as MSNBC and CNN went with the same theme as well.

The headline above was refuted by SEVERAL pundits as being an over exaggeration and in turn pundits condemned how several George Soros friendly media such as Huffington Post and MSNBC were trying to keep the quote alive and use it as a reason for Hillary Clinton to quit.

SEVERAL news outlets denounced the story as much ado about nothing.

The headline below is from 2006 and clearly shows that Huffington Post had already decided two years ago that Hillary Clinton could not be the nominee.

A purported internet news source such as Huffington Post pretending to be an unbiased news site when it has a predisposed agenda is a form of fraud, no? Shouldn't there be an investigation?

Is it really acceptable for Huffington Post to parade as an "internet newspaper" while all along Huffington Post has a built in agenda to hype one democratic candidate defeat another?

Newsweek comes to the aid of George Soros, Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, MOVE ON, Media Matters, and Daily Kos attack squad, with an article that claims it is impossible to cheat in an election.

Of course Newsweek never mentions the caucus cheating that went on in which one million voters were able to over ride the will of 35 million voters, and Newsweek never mentions what "Fair-Reflection" means to the democratic party. www.FAIR-REFLECTION.blogspot.com

Oh wait, maybe I was wrong. (sarcasm alert) Maybe Huffington Post did put a very nice picture of Hillary Clinton on their website.........

.......After Hillary Clinton was forced to drink the Obama Kool Aid or risk further wrath and damage from Huffington Post and MSNBC's ongoing assault for not quitting the race sooner.

Below is me getting banned from Huffington Post after my articles on the George Soros / Arianna Huffington hook up appeared on my blogs.

Don't be alarmed, you're not banned, that was me getting banned from Huffington Post. That was the message that popped up on my Huffington Post account after my George Soros / Arianna Huffington "have hooked up" articles appeared on my blogs.

The banning by Huffington Post just gives me more time for my own blogs.

Works for me.

(Edit update - Dec. 16, 2010 11:04 PM - It should be noted that is all just Huffington Post. While Huffington Post was doing their daily Hillary Clinton assault and Barack Obama is great fluff pieces, there was MSNBC assaulting Hillary Clinton almost by the hour, Time, Newsweek with their hit pieces, The Atlantic, lets not forget the FOUR HUNDRED COLUMNISTS WHO COVERTLY AGREED TO PROTECT BARACK OBAMA FROM ANY RACIST TIES while simultaneously either ignoring Hillary Clinton, or attacking her.)

I hope you in the mainstream media are all proud. Every day 10,000 Americans lose their home, and Barack Obama just keeps his poker face on, as if it has nothing to do with him.

Ralph Nader comments hit the mark.

Original story at Ralph Nader Partial Transcript from Rocky Mountain News

It was sad watching MSNBC trash Ralph Nader and his comments about Barack Obama's candidacy. MSNBC and its "pundits" called Ralph Nader "out of touch", "craving attention", "comments from an old guy" "out of it", and that the comments were racist.

What Ralph Nader said, in my opinion, was that Barack Obama has been bought by George Soros and Company. Barack will avoid confrontation with anybody that supports or is supported by Soros. Of course MSNBC will be all over Nader and trash him since they are part of the Soros led media takeover.

Rather than being a very popular, maverick candidate with a shining star future in the democratic party whose grass roots candidacy barely lost to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama chose to be owned by George Soros in exchange for the over the top help it gave him against Hillary Clinton. Ralph Nader saw exactly what has happened and how it has compromised Barack Obama and hit a bullseye with his comments.

I believe that the level of media collusion backing George Soros and subsequently supporting each other already exists. Ralph Nader's comments may have been attention getting, but they were right on the mark, Barack Obama is beholden to too many other interests.

George Soros, Huffington Post, MSNBC, MoveOn, Media Matters, Newsweek, and CNN have played favorites politically while claiming to be news oriented non biased media. This is the kind of fraud that needs to be investigated by the FBI.

Here is the transcript of what Nader said from the Rocky Mountain News.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: "Do you see Barack Obama as qualitatively different than Al Gore or any other Democrats. He talks about taking on lobbyists, not taking money directly from lobbyists ... People portray him as being different. Do you see him as being any better than Al Gore or any of the other Democrats that you've opposed over the years?"

Nader: "No. I mean, he's deceiving people. He takes, he takes ... In this very building he would take money from corporate lawyers who are not registered lobbyists but whose desks are across the aisle from corporate lawyers who are registered lobbyists in the same law firm. That has been reported more than once in the mainstream press ... Six out of seven industries, as of a month ago, have given more money to Obama than they have to McCain, only the transportation industry is more equal opportunity corruption.

"Look at the health care industry. It has poured money into his campaign. The securities industry, the defense industry. No.

"There's only one thing different about Barack Obama when it comes to being a Democratic presidential candidate. He's half African-American. Whether that will make any difference, I don't know. I haven't heard him have a strong crackdown on economic exploitation in the ghettos. Payday loans, predatory lending, asbestos, lead. What's keeping him from doing that? Is it because he wants to talk white? He doesn't want to appear like Jesse Jackson? We'll see all that play out in the next few months and if he gets elected afterwards."

"I think his main problem is that he censors himself. He knows exactly who has power, who has too much, who has too little, what needs to be done right down to the community level. But he has bought the advice that if you want to win the election, you better take it easy on the corporate abuses and do X, Y, Z. When I hear that I say, 'Oh, I see. So he's doing all this to win the election, and then he'll be different.

"Well let's see if it worked. Did it work for Mondale? Did it work for Dukakis? Did it work for Clinton? Yes, but only because of Perot? Did it work for Gore? Did it work for Kerry ... ?"

Q: "Do you think he's trying to, what was your term, 'talk white?'"

NADER: "Of course. I mean, first of all, the number one thing that a black American politician aspiring to the presidency should be is to candidly describe the plight of the poor, especially in the inner cities and the rural areas, and have a very detailed platform about how the poor is going to be defended by the law, is going to be protected by the law, and is going to be liberated by the law. Haven't heard a thing.

"I mean, the amount of economic exploitation in the ghettos is shocking. You'd think he'd propose a task force to at least study it. I mean, these people are eroded every day. The kids, bodies are asbestos and lead, municipal services discriminate against them because it's the poor area, including fire and police protection and building code enforcement. And then the lenders, the loan sharks get at them, and the dirty food ends up in the ghettos, like the contaminated meat. It's a dumping ground for shoddy merchandise. You don't see many credit unions there. You don't see many libraries there. You don't see many health clinics there. This is, we're talking 40-50 million Americans who are predominantly African-Americans and Latinos. Anybody see that kind of campaigning? Have you seen him campaign in real poor areas of the city very frequently? No, he doesn't campaign there."

Q: "What do you think the purpose of that is?"

NADER: "He wants to show that he is not a threatening, a political threatening, another politically-threatening African-American politician.

"He wants to appeal to white guilt. You appeal to white guilt not by coming on as a black is beautiful, black is powerful. Basically he's coming on as someone who is not going to threaten the white power structure, whether it's corporate or whether it's simply oligarchic. And they love it. Whites just eat it up."

Barack Obama Practicing His Belly Flops under David Axelrod's Guidance.

John Kerry was labeled the Flip Flopper, and it appears Barack Obama is headed towards being this years sister version of the Flip Flopper, the Belly Flopper. I blame David Axelrod for this. Axelrod's biggest strength is also his biggest weakness, Axelrod gives up no ground to anyone on anything.

I believe Axelrod's type of sociopathic arrogance will backfire. Never admitting anything about anything that one may have done wrong is akin to what the George Bush administration is all about. Before one trys to apply that same label to the Clintons, at least they would move on once they saw an idea of theirs was not going to get through and try and come up with a more acceptable plan.

Barack Obama's approach seems to be different. Admit nothing, and when you fly over the handlebars and make a spectacular head over heels crash landing, just dust yourself off and say, "I meant to do that".

Barack Obama definitely has a tightrope act to follow, he must be confident, concise, and unwavering in his views, while still being "progressive" and "new wave" for the younger crowd that believes in him, even as he courts older people's money that comes attached with older world views. Because of this, David Axelrod is the worst person in the world to still lead Barack Obama's campaign.

I think it's time for Axelrod to finish drinking the Kool Aid and let someone else take over that people will actually believe. Axelrod served his purpose. He played his role of bad cop to the extreme, which in turn allowed Barack Obama to be the good cop. When Barack dumps Axelrod, then I'll at least have a tiny bit of faith that Barack Obama is his own man.

The bigger question however is, when does Barack Obama really develop his own style and dump George Soros.

http://www.Obama Closely Linked with Corn. Barack Obama backs the Ethanol industry even while dissing petroleum. Unfortunately Ethanol cannot be pipelined because of it's volatility, which means the moment you move the lightweight yet voluminous corn to a processing plant, you are using petroleum to move it, which wipes out significant portion of alleged ethanol advantage.

Hillary Clinton Forced to Give Suspension Speech to Her Supporters.

The Media Attack spearheaded by George Soros, Huffington Post, and MSNBC against Hillary Clinton took the next step as Hillary Clinton was forced to give a suspension speech to her supporters in support of Barack Obama.

As has been the standard operating procedure for several months, Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann speak with an aire of inevitability, actually creating the news rather than reporting it. The news you see today is the story line Olberman, Matthews, Andrea Mitchell and company at MSNBC, plus Huffington Post, helped initiate several day ago.

Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews moderated the pomp and cirumcumstance as Tim Russert stood by on the sidelines, another victim of the Olbermann and Matthews arrogance that grows by the day.

Nowhere was the term Fair Reflection mentioned as the democratic party goes down the path of letting a billionaire and his proxy Arianna Huffington manipulate and control the democratic party nominating process to a degree never witnessed before.

New Blog from Alessandro Machi, WALL STREET CHANGE, is now Online.

Wall Street Change

While the George Soros / Arianna Huffington led Media Attack against Hillary Clinton appears to be succeeding, I think it important to not lose sight of issues that affect every american on a daily level.

Wall Street fascinates me.

I understand that Wall Street represents a link to the global business community, but is the Wall Street Status quo acceptable to americans who are seeing their local economy suffer as a result?

When Wall Street Stock rises because a fortune 500 company reduces american labor force, even when that labor force was not actually losing the company money, it becomes clear that Wall Street's agenda is different from that which is decent for the american citizen. I'd like Wall Street Change to be a place where we build simple ideas into simple solutions that maybe one day get incorporated by Wall Street.