Showing posts with label controversy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label controversy. Show all posts

Friday, October 24, 2008

Sarah Palin's Wardrobe IS NOT an issue, just retribution after Michelle Obama's 400 dollar lunch snack was publicized.

The Sarah Palin wardrobe "controversy" is easily debunkable. What did Hillary Clinton spend on her wardrobe. If the answer is, "a lot", then Sarah Palin is entitled to the same. If the answer to what Hillary Clinton's wardrobe cost is "modest and reasonable", then the response is, "well, it didn't help Hillary Clinton win, did it?

Additionally, the MSNBC led media has been ridiculing Sarah Palin on several fronts, the one area they could not ridicule Sarah Palin on was her clothing, until now. If Sarah Palin had worn anything too frumpy or too blue collar, the media would have just weaved Palin's clothing choices into their ongoing evisceration of Sarah Plain.

Well guess what, the MSNBC led media was going to eventually ridicule Sarah Palin's clothing no matter what she wore. To my eyes, MSNBC is incorporating a "damned no matter what they do" attack against McCain and Palin. The other thing to realize is this is a retaliation to Michelle Obama and her 400 dollar lunch of lobster and shrimp.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Same Sex Marriage Approved By California Supreme Court.

Same Sex Marriage Approved By California Supreme Court.


Congratulations guys for coming out of the closet (not that there's anything wrong with that). However, it's too little too late.

In case anyone feels I am mocking the California Supreme Court's ruling today over same sex marriage, I am not.

I am actually mocking the attempt by the Barack Obama camp to try and overshadow Hillary Clinton's 41 point margin of victory in West Virginia, and the Nebraska primary vote, by introducing John Edwards the day after Hillary's huge victories.

The Edwards announcement was not a momentum changer, it was just touted as one by the media as an excuse to stop talking about West Virginia. The media never even got around to mentioning that in Nebraska Hillary Clinton only lost by two points in the Nebraska primary, a stark difference to the 35% point loss Hillary suffered at the hands of a cheating Barack Obama in the Nebraska caucus vote.

Let us not also forget the Washington State primary, which showed a 30 point margin of victory REDUCTION from their previous caucus vote. Barack Obama's caucus state wins are ALL TAINTED, and the mathematical proof is becoming more and more self evident with each passing day.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Geraldine Ferraro's Comments Explained...

Geraldine Ferraro's Comments Explained...
As heard on the John Gibson show. (Geraldine Ferraro speaks) Between me and you and your millions of visitors, er listeners, if Barack Obama were a white man, would we be talking about this as a potential real problem for Hillary? (John interjects) You mean if Barack were John Edwards? (Geraldine continues) If he were a women of any color would he be in this position that he is in, absolutely not. (John) Geraldine are you playing the race card? (Geraldine) NO and that's the problem, everytime you speak the truth-I'm the first person John, and you know how honest I am, I am the first person who will say in 1984, If my name were Girard instead of Geraldine, I would never have been picked to be the vice presidential candidate.

The main thing that Geraldine Ferraro's comments revealed was how pretentious many in our society have become, and I'm not referring to Ms. Ferraro but everyone who reacted in a ridiculous manner to her comments.

Ms. Ferraro's comment had a basic truth to them.

Because Barack Obama was the only black person in the race, Obama DID have an advantage. If Alan Keyes had chosen to run for president again, Mr. Keyes would have dug into Obama's numbers just enough to possibly be lethal.

But here is where lack of a sense of humor harms everybody. If there had been another women in the race, that women would also have cut into Ms. Clinton's numbers just enough to potentially be lethal. The comedy about Ms. Ferraro's comments was that whatever Ms. Ferraro said about Obama basically applies to Hillary Clinton as well.

It wasn't until John Edwards left the race that Obama picked up his final momentum. Once again, Ms. Ferraro's analysis ring true. When it was two men against one women, the two men were splitting the vote to a certain degree and Hillary Clinton, as the only women, was benefiting. Just as Ms. Ferraro claimed Barack Obama benefited by being the only black, Hillary Clinton also benefited by being the only women in the race.

In the end, Geraldine Ferraro was right, the problem was nobody had enough of a sense of humor to point out that everything she attributed to Barack Obama as being "luck" could also have been attributed to Hillary Clinton being just as lucky by being the only woman in the race.

I think it is also true that if Barack Obama were white he would have lost a lot of the black vote to.... Hillary Clinton. Hillary's base would have been middle aged and older white women, blacks of all ages, and mexicans of all ages as well, and that would have been a powerful one, two, three punch.

The fact that everyone reacted so stiffly to Ms. Ferraro's comments is what concerns me most. Rather than take the time to really understand Geraldine Ferraro's comments, everyone went for the immediate gratification of a knockout punch that saw Ms. Ferraro resign from Hillary Clinton's finance committee team.

Should Hillary have defended Ms. Ferraro? Since Obama had just let go one of his own people for calling Hillary a name, Hillary's hands were tied and she basically had to accept Geraldine Ferraro's resignation.