Lesley Stahl reveals she had Coronavirus, but then reveals nothing about her actual treatment while in the Hospital, why?

Please watch this video, if you agree, please share it.

This is the new blogspot address for my original Hillary-Wins blog of 2008.

I was so loyal to Hillary Clinton's 2008 Presidential Run that I used my actual name real name for the blogspot address. (it was one of my first if not first blogspot effort and I did not know better).

When my politics changed, (directly tied to how the California Democrat dominated State will use their own ER's to help euthanize seniors), I suddenly felt disgust that I had allowed my own blogspot name be used to support a candidate who lost her way because of fierce Progressive animos towards Hillary Clinton's 2016 run.

However, I wanted my 2008 research to live on so I transferred all of my articles to this site. Unfortunately any reference to Hillary-Wins from my DailyPUMA site will not be forwarded here unless I can find all the old links and change them.

I will be doing another article about South Carolina's role, or lack of, in the 2020 Elections in the next few days. Interesting how 12 years have gone by and suddenly my research from 2008 may have some significance for those who know better.

Donna Brazile at it again, blasts the Clintons over the 2016 DNC race.

In case anyone missed a prior Hillary-Wins article about Donna Brazile from 2008, check this out. Some things and some people never change.

Forbes Article Proves Donald Trump could face Income Tax Fraud Charges and Billions in Penalties if Trump loses the 2016 Presidential Election to Hillary Clinton.

Forbes Article Proves Donald Trump could face Income Tax Fraud Charges and Billions in Penalties if Trump loses the 2016 Presidential Election to Hillary Clinton. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump Bombshell. The Real Reason Donald Trump won't release his income tax returns, Donald Trump may face IRS Tax Fraud, Income Tax Evasion, billions in penalties, and possibly Jail Time.

Donald Trump Bombshell. The Real Reason Donald Trump won't release his income tax returns, Donald Trump may face IRS Tax Fraud, Income Tax Evasion, billions in penalties, and possibly Jail Time. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Ma, Ma. Where is Pa? Gone to the White House, Ha ha ha.

Grover Cleveland supporters came up with the response to Ma Ma where is Pa? The response Gone to the White House, Ha Ha Ha derailed the churlish comments of those who had no substantive complaints to make.

Donald Trump has now come up with "Lock her up", to which the Late Show's James Cordon came up with, "in the White House".  "Lock her up, in the White House".

Hillary Clinton supporters need to drown out the "Lock her up" chants with "In the White House".

Meanwhile Barack Obama's popularity continues to rise the more Mr. Trump bellows.

Krystal Ball is the latest Hillary Clinton Concern Troll, and yes, she works for MSNBC.

Krystal Ball is the latest Hillary Clinton Concern Troll, and yes, she works for MSNBC.  Click link to read more at DailyPUMA

Barack Obama accepts ANONYMOUS pre-paid credit card 2008 campaign donations.

(Edit update, Nov. 26, 2011, 2:39 pm - Sixty Minutes revealed earlier this month that Nancy Pelosi received VISA IPO's in early 2008. Is there a connection between VISA, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama receiving fraudulent named and addressed pre-paid credit card donations in 2008?  No other candidate that I know of accepted fake named and addressed pre-paid visa credit card donations in 2008.)


Nobody knows for sure how much money Barack Obama's 2008 campaign collected through anonymous pre-paid credit cards, but it was in the millions, most likely in the tens of millions, and it may have been even more than tens of millions of dollars.

Anonymous people would use names like Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck on pre-paid credit card donations to the Barack Obama campaign, and apparently the donations went through! There were apparently pre-paid credit card donation mills as well.

Hillary Clinton and John McCain were just a couple of fogies that did not allow fraudulent pre-paid credit card campaign donations because they recognized such donations as being illegal.

Can a US president elected under the method described above be counted on to go after the very people on wall street involved in the home securitization fraud when those same people may have helped him pull off the pre-paid credit card campaign fraud? (link update added June 28. 2011).

70 million americans are taking care of an elderly family member, 15 million are taking care of a family member with alzheimers.

70 million americans are taking care of an elderly family member, 15 million are taking care of a family member with alzheimers.

You are viewing Swarm The Banks. Please check out Parallel Foreclosure blog and UNfair Foreclosures blog as well.

HI DAILY PUMA READERS, I CAN'T ACCESS DAILY PUMA! NEVER MIND, NOW I CAN!

Ever since I did a software update for my browser, I have not been able to log into Daily PUMA. It's been especially frustrating because I miss typed my prior headline and wanted to correct it, but have been unable to for the past two days.

Ok, now everything seems to be working fine. whew.

Shocking Discovery about Real Clear Politics Colossal 2008 Mistake in June 4th article while analyzing Barack Obama's "efficient voters" postulation.

Jay Cost at Real Clear Politics stated in June 04, 2008 article that Barack Obama required less votes per each delegate won, than Hillary Clinton. Jay Cost then posulated that Barack Obama was the more "efficient" candidate.

The timing of the Real Clear Politics, June 04th, 2008 article about vote efficiency per delegate won, that favored Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton, was suspiciously timed since Hillary Clinton would give her resignation speech just a scant three days later.

Most importantly, the article was one hundred percent, WRONG.

From Real Clear Politics and Jay Cost, (in italics are Jay's words, my responses are in bold color cyan)

"Thus, Obama has won the Democratic nomination not because his voting coalition is larger than Clinton's. -Jay Cost

(When Michigan and Florida are not counted, then perhaps the two voting blocks are "equal", otherwise Hillary Clinton had the larger voting coalition.)

As best we can tell, they are of equal size. Instead, Obama has won because his coalition is moreefficient at producing delegates than Clinton's coalition. -Jay Cost

lol, so cheating in Caucus Contests where 88% LESS voters determine each delegate, bribing some Clinton delegates to switch to Obama, and spending twice as much per delegate is considered "more efficient?".

Obama's relatively narrow vote lead has produced a relatively wide pledged delegate lead, which has in turn produced an even wider lead in superdelegates." -Jay Cost

When Hillary Clinton's early on relatively narrow vote total lead had produced a relatively wider pledged delegate lead, which in turn produced an even wider lead when superdelegates were added in, the media spotlighted all of the Obama complainers who threatened to riot in the streets if Hillary won because of a dis representative lead in delegates and super delegates versus popular vote totals.

I am calling out the writer, Jay Cost, who is responsible for the coherent trash (written in italics above) that was first published on June 04th, 2008, three days before Hillary Clinton's resignation speech.

Furthermore, I am demanding, not asking, I am demanding that Jay Cost PUBLICLY APOLOGIZE to Hillary Clinton for the inane, stupid, and completely WRONG conclusion he came to in that June 04, 2008 article when Jay Cost declared that less votes per delegate was "more efficient".

If Jay Cost had simply compared total primary votes versus delegates won, Hillary Clinton might have still had a less efficient total of primary delegates versus total voters than Barack Obama. All that would have meant was that Hillary Clinton had a distinct lead in TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS who voted the way voters vote on presidential election day.

There was absolutely no point in adding caucus contests when caucus contests in NO WAY represent voting efficiency other than to skew results that may or may not be representative of presidential voting.

Democratic Caucus contests in Republican strongholds polled just a week prior to the caucus vote showed Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton either tied, or Hillary Clinton leading.

Yet Barack Obama ended up winning the democratic caucus contests in Republican stronghold states that require 88% less voters, by a 2-1 margin. The problem is, this is how Barack Obama got his alleged "more efficient" per delegate ratio, by winning where there was a HUGE undervote per delegate won in caucus states that DID NOT honor the democratic tenet of Fair Reflection.

But it's worse than that!

Early on in the 2008 democratic race the media was publicizing complaints being made by the Barack Obama side that Hillary Clinton had an extra large delegate lead based on LESS voters per delegate because of Hillary Clinton's super delegates and committed delegates edge, and that these super delegates should not be deciding who becomes president.

Can we appreciate the irony of that? What Hillary Clinton had early on, was railed against as being unrepresentative of the will of the people, but when Barack Obama ended up with what Hillary Clinton had early on, Real Clear Politics pinions their belief that Barack Obama is more "efficient" at collecting delegate voters.

Barack Obama now had what Hillary Clinton had earlier in the race; a delegate lead based on less votes per delegate and higher levels of super delegate votes, but suddenly rather than people rioting in the streets, it meant that Barack Obama was the more efficient candidate at getting delegate votes.

The media applauded Barack Obama and his voters' efficiency per Obama delegate gained while using the same data when it favored Hillary Clinton to publicize the threat of rioting in the streets.

Clear Politics article also fails to point out that there were districts won by Hillary Clinton where the delegates simply chose to vote for Barack Obama.

Apparently, none other than Nancy Pelosi made "donations" to a higher percentage of Barack Obama delegates than Hillary Clinton delegates, and delegates who switched sides from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama were more likely to get "donations" from Pelosi and others.

Real Clear Politics FAILURE to delineate that caucus results are rather pointless when it comes to who will actually be a stronger presidential election was basically criminal in this instance as it reversed the true relevance of the importance of having more votes per delegate won since popular vote is still how EACH state awards ALL of its delegates.

Which brings us to the issue of delegates won. Hillary Clinton actually won way more electoral college votes than Barack Obama did, and this reality was never put into play by the Real Clear Politics article.

If Real Clear Politics had simply broken down the results into two categories, the delegates won from the caucuses, and the delegates won from the primaries, Hillary Clinton would have had the more "efficient" delegate totals, and more delegates as well.

I can only wonder if anyone else from the media repeated the rampant stupidity displayed in this particular Real Clear Politics article and used it to hammer Hillary Clinton into resigning three days later.

The June 04, 2008 Real Clear Politics article never addresses the COST per DELEGATE for Barack Obama versus Hillary Clinton, which Hillary Clinton easily won in a landslide.

Real Clear Politics deceived its readers and the media by not reporting key data and focusing on less relevant data instead.

The three most important data elements to consider are overall cost per each delegate won per candidate, Overall cost per each delegate won in the primary states, and who won the most electoral college votes during the democratic presidential race.

In each of those three instances, the answer would be Hillary Clinton.

Stunning Graph from 2008 Democratic Primary Race shows Hillary Clinton with a HUGE Lead in 3 out of 4 key demographics in Republican Leaning States.

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE GRAPH.

Real Clear Politics produced the above 2008 democratic candidates popularity in republican leaning states graph. What is so odd about this graph is it shows Hillary Clinton with a HUGE LEAD among 3 out of 4 key demographics in the Republican leaning swing states, yet the accompanying article seems to down play the graph.

This is really important to note because most of Barack Obama's caucus wins were in Republican leaning states! Hillary Clinton had a decisive advantage when republican leaning states had primaries, but when other republican leaning states had CAUCUSES instead of primaries, Barack Obama won by a 2-1 margin.

In my next article, I will explore a huge blunder made by Real Clear Politics.

Democratic Party making complaints against the republican party in 2010 that Hillary Clinton supporters made in 2008 against the democratic party.

The democratic party and Barack Obama are complaining that the Republican Party is funneling in foreign money and using it to fund Chamber of Commerce attack ads against the democrats. This is the kind of mind numbing arrogance the democratic party and Barack Obama use against its own constituents. Even if the accusation was true, it was Barack Obama that allowed traceless credit card political contributions to his 2008 presidential campaign.

Barack Obama even complained that the republicans are outspending the democrats by anywhere from a 4-1 to 7-1 margin and that this is because of the foreign source of money. Um, didn't Barack Obama do the same thing to Hillary Clinton in the 2008 democratic race? Reports of Barack Obama outspending Hillary Clinton by 3-1 and 4-1 in several midwestern states were commonly found in the media. Yet Barack Obama had NO ACCOUNTABILITY regarding where ALL of his donations were coming from.

In 2008 democratic party leaders also minimized Bill Clinton's record from the 90's only to now bring it up as a huge positive as they face potential losses in the 2010 November races. Might be nice if one day some democrats jump ship and report the truth about the 2008 unaccounted financial contributions that Barack Obama received.

Arianna Huffington: Women Leaders Need To Do Things Differently - SVW

Arianna Huffington: Women Leaders Need To Do Things Differently - SVW

This blog did a review of the articles that Huffington Post generated in 2008 that slammed Hillary Clinton on an almost daily basis while she was running for the democratic nomination.

Sarah Palin was also slammed by Huffington Post as well, and yet, Huffington Post wants to lead the charge in teaching women leaders need to do things differently. Yeesh!

I guess its all about the Huffington Post when it comes to which females are to be supported.

Posted using ShareThis

A message to all the Clinton Haters.

For all you Clinton Haters out there....did you notice that during Bill Clintons two terms in office the YEARLY FEDERAL BUDGET DEFICIT SHRUNK EACH AND EVERY YEAR until it became a surplus.

For all of you Clinton haters, Bill Clinton left office with the highest approval rating of any president since at least 1946, and probably well before that as well.

For all of you Clinton haters, Bill Clinton left office as the only president to have a higher approval rating at the end of his term than the beginning.

See the graphs here.

For all of you Clinton haters, who were pleased at seeing Hillary Clinton defeated by caucus cheating and suspicious donations and the democratic elite plotting against her in 2008, you are now suffering as a result of being a Clinton hater.

Remember that the next time you say you hate a Clinton.

Can you be a ground zero PUMA if you don't still support Hillary Clinton? Part II.

So why did the Democratic Party Higher ups secretly plot against Hillary Clinton during the 2008 presidential election? They believed their chances of retaining their own position in Congress would be strengthened if Barack Obama was elected instead of Hillary Clinton.

The problem with this type of me first, the country second position is two fold. First, it is really selfish to care about one's own political career to the point where you only support a presidential candidate based on a mythical belief that one presidential candidate's speech making ability will help keep you in your office.

Just because a politician may like one candidate's "charisma" more than another, is that enough? "I like this candidate, therefore he will help me keep my seat in Congress?" The answer is a resounding, of course not.

Reason number two on why it is an unknown as to which candidate can help keep any politician in their position. There will usually be an inevitable "push back" two years after a new political party gains control of the white house. In recent times, 2 years into the new presidents term the side that lost seats during the presidential election actually will gain some back.

Ironically, what Pelosi and Reid did may actually backfire on them because they may not have supported the best candidate and are more likely to lose their seat, not less likely as a result.

I'm all for that, that's for sure.

As for the PUMA movement, I would love to see PUMA's who don't necessarily agree with each other to at least consider supporting the idea that anyone who deceived Hillary Clinton in 2008 SHOULD NOT be re-elected, even if it means voting republican in those particular instances.

Can you be a ground zero PUMA if you don't still support Hillary Clinton? Part I.

Yes, it is a rhetorical question. You cannot be an original, ground zero PUMA unless you also support Hillary Clinton because the two are completely intertwined. You can be a conservative PUMA who has moved on and now supports Sarah Palin, that's fine, but that is not the same as being an original PUMA. (should I add an H for Hillary Clinton and call it PUMAH?)

Lets be clear here, the original PUMA movement was in direct response to the democratic elite in the party not only wanting Hillary Clinton defeated, but actually making sure their coup took place before ALL THE VOTES OF THE REGISTERED DEMOCRATS WERE COUNTED!

One only has to look to the republican leaders to see how out of line the democratic political leaders were in the 2008 election. Late in 2007, John McCain was well under 5% approval on a fox poll, it might have been as low as 2%.

John McCain clearly was not the first choice of the republican higher ups, yet the people, the people of the republican party over time chose John McCain EVEN THOUGH JOHN McCain had virtually no financial support.

The same cannot be said of the democrats, who tried to end the democratic race BEFORE IT EVEN STARTED! When a politician such as Hillary Clinton receives 50% of the popular vote even though the opposition has more than twice the money to spend and has the support of the media, the democratic higher ups, and billionaires such as George Soros, it just may lead to the formation of an independent group of Hillary Clinton supporters who call themselves PUMA's.

In Part II of this article, I'll give a simple explanation as to why the democratic party higher ups decided to corrupt their own party.

A REMINDER LINK TO JUST HOW BADLY HUFFINGTON POST TREATED HILLARY CLINTON DURING THE 2008 DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION PROCESS.

This took quite a bit of work to put together, but in commemoration of Huffington Post today ridiculing Hillary Clinton because Bill Clinton went to North Korea, (huh?) to pick up two american journalists, check out this very damaging tribute to Huffington Posts nastiness against Hillary Clinton in 2008. Click anywhere in this short article to go to that article.

I've Got a Crush on Hillary YouTube Video

I missed this video when it came out for the first

time. Nice. Totally inappropriate still shot, the

music video itself is pretty good.

The TEN DOLLAR CHASE BANK CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PROTEST CHALLENGE made by MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN JOE.

The TEN DOLLAR CHASE BANK CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PROTEST CHALLENGE made by MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN JOE.

Posted using ShareThis

BLOGGERS AGAINST CHASE BANK SPROUTS WINGS.

BLOGGERS AGAINST CHASE BANK has a big task ahead. The task is to educate Chase Bank CE Jamie Dimon that he doesn't know what he is doing in the credit card and home mortgage fields.

Once the personal realization sets in at how incompetent Jamie Dimon truly is, BLOGGERS AGAINST CHASE BANK hopes to reverse some of the most idiotic and anti-american actions that Jamie Dimon seems to be most proud of.

Perhaps two of the worst are freezing home equity lines at far below fair value, and raising the monthly minimum payment with no OPT OUT option for 2 million of Chase Bank's most reliable, never late making a payment, customers.

OH NO, ROSIE THE RIVETER PASSES AWAY.

I learned about Rosie the Riveter when I was in college. I found the whole documentary fascinating. I did not know that there were two Rosie the Riveters! Her obit in the LA Daily News is touching.

I had just finished and posted an article at DailyPUMA before I found out or I would have posted this article there. This blog appears on DailyPUMA so for now it will reside here. Here is the OBITUARY Link, may it live forever.

Daily-Protest against the Credit Card Industry continues.

Please learn more about the Chase Bank credit card industry protest at Daily-Protest.com

Linking back to one of this Blogs most intense Articles about the Media Bias and Sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure in 2008.

This article took over a day to put together, plus work over a couple of months collecting various headlines not knowing they would one day be used to create this article.

This one is from Hillary Clinton Forum.net

Linking back to one of this Blogs most intense Articles about the the Media Bias and Sexism that Hillary Clinton had to endure in 2008.

This article took over a day to put together, plus work over a couple of months collecting various headlines not knowing they would one day be used to create this article.

This one is from Hillary Clinton Forum.net

"Barack Obama Citizenship Lawsuits did not have standing", EXPLAINED.

"Three United States District Courts have ruled that private citizens do not have standing to challenge the eligibility of candidates to appear on a presidential election ballot: Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (N.D. Cal. 2008); Hollander v. McCain, 2008WL2853250 (D.N.H. 2008); Berg v. Obama, 08-04083 (E.D. Pa. 2008)[15]."

There is a HUGE difference in challenging the right for someone to RUN for president, versus challenging their right to BE president. These prior rulings DO NOT APPLY now that Barack Obama has been elected. Assuming the challenges have been changed from RUNNING for president to BEING president, it should be a whole new ballgame in the supreme court.

Recycling Rev Pfleger's "She's White & Entitled" Speech for Caroline Kennedy. I guess if the "Black Man" says it's Ok to be Entitled, then it's OK.

Since Barack Obama and myself and many others believe in recycling, I thought it might be wise to recycle the Rev Michael Pfleger Entitlement Speech and see how accurately it describes Caroline Kennedy. It sure seems a like more accurate now in describing Caroline Kennedy then it did the first time around describing Hillary Clinton.

Lets end this farce and let Hillary Clinton choose her own successor.

BLAGOJEVICH the BRIBE WHORE to KEEP SENATOR NAMING RIGHTS while a "PROMOTED" HILLARY CLINTON has No Say for her own Senatorial Replacement.

It is just wrong to allow Blagojevich to name a senatorial replacement after the comments he has made about wanting money in exchange for the position. It is also wrong that Hillary Clinton does not get to name her own replacement when she supposedly has been "promoted".

A male who appears to have behaved in a sleazy manner gets to keep his power, a woman who was promoted and has been labeled a team player, does not. Just more male dominated crap.

Thank You President Bush, for Ducking.

I am seriously proud of President Bush for ducking. I am a bit curious how the journalist was able to slip both of his shoes off with no secret service person noticing. Perhaps they are trained to look for guns only and missed what was probably more noticeable, a journalist taking his shoes off and then throwing them at the president.

I was curious why a secret service agent didn't react quicker, at the very least, blocking the second shoe. Perhaps that would have looked silly, diving across the room to block a shoe? Pat Buchanan mentioned the very same thing on television a short while ago. I kind of chuckled that Pat and I were thinking about that second shoe.

I am also pleased that the Iraqi's have a way of showing discord that does not involve gunfire or bombs. That speaks well of their culture.

Barack Obama's Latest YouTube Video Still Needs a Bit of Tweaking...

The Lamp is TOO BRIGHT. You need to add a dimmer and dim the light down a tad. This will both give the lampshade some color AND allow the overall image to be brightened a bit more. Right now the image is too dark because the lamp's brightness is either fooling the camera's autoexposure into darkening the image a bit, or the lamp's brightness is not being properly clipped which results in an overall video image that is too dark.

Just trying to be helpful. (Ok it was a regional emmy I won, but that still counts).